Re: [Alsa-user] Re: hdsploader

2003-09-09 Thread Thomas Charbonnel
> I wrote: > >>> I always have to call hdsploader twice > > "Thomas Charbonnel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> This is a known problem, but I don't have a solution right now. It >> appears that sometimes (maybe always on some systems) the fifo status >> wait function unexpectedly fails where it s

[Alsa-user] Re: hdsploader

2003-09-09 Thread Robert Epprecht
I wrote: >> I always have to call hdsploader twice "Thomas Charbonnel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > This is a known problem, but I don't have a solution right now. It appears > that sometimes (maybe always on some systems) the fifo status wait > function unexpectedly fails where it shouldn't as

Re: [Alsa-user] Re: hdsploader

2003-09-07 Thread Thomas Charbonnel
> "Thomas Charbonnel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >>> I wasn't successful in my attempts to compile hdspmixer yet >>> (which I assume is due to my limited experience with this kind of >>> work). > >> Can you give me more information about the problem, like compiler >> error messages if any ? Plea

[Alsa-user] Re: hdsploader

2003-09-06 Thread Robert Epprecht
"Thomas Charbonnel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I wasn't successful in my attempts to compile hdspmixer yet >> (which I assume is due to my limited experience with this kind of work). > Can you give me more information about the problem, like compiler error > messages if any ? Please note that

Re: [Alsa-user] Re: hdsploader

2003-09-06 Thread Thomas Charbonnel
> As we're at it I have another question: I wasn't successful in my > attempts to compile hdspmixer yet (which I assume is due to my limited > experience with this kind of work). > Can you give me more information about the problem, like compiler error messages if any ? Please note that hdspmixer

[Alsa-user] Re: hdsploader

2003-09-06 Thread Robert Epprecht
"Thomas Charbonnel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I always have to call hdsploader twice: > This is a known problem, but I don't have a solution right now. It appears > that sometimes (maybe always on some systems) the fifo status wait > function unexpectedly fails where it shouldn't as the ligh