At Fri, 13 Feb 2015 15:56:18 +0100,
Tino Mettler wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2015-02-10 at 11:43 +0100, Adrian Knoth wrote:
>
> > How about the following patch? (untested, but since we already know what
> > we're aiming for, this is just a matter of how to implement the
> > constraint):
> >
> > From cf48
On Tue, 2015-02-10 at 11:43 +0100, Adrian Knoth wrote:
> How about the following patch? (untested, but since we already know what
> we're aiming for, this is just a matter of how to implement the
> constraint):
>
> From cf4853f0796f28bf8bcad4d1ba9a8ee80217a6ad Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Adr
On Tue, 2015-02-10 at 12:09 +0100, Tino Mettler wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-02-10 at 11:48 +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
>
> > Let me know whether the patch really works for you guys.
>
> Hi,
>
> I noticed the patch and will try to test it this week. Currently I use
> the patch with fixed period of 2 and
On Tue, 2015-02-10 at 11:48 +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> Let me know whether the patch really works for you guys.
Hi,
I noticed the patch and will try to test it this week. Currently I use
the patch with fixed period of 2 and it works fine.
Regards,
Tino
-
At Tue, 10 Feb 2015 11:43:54 +0100,
Adrian Knoth wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 09, 2015 at 03:26:00PM +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
>
> > > > > > What if with --buffer-size=256 or --buffer-size=192, i.e. align
> > > > > > buffer
> > > > > > size and period size?
> > > > > Only 128 works for me.
> > > > Th
On 10/02/2015 1:17 AM, Tino Mettler wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-02-09 at 15:14 +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
>> At Mon, 9 Feb 2015 15:06:14 +0100,
>> Tino Mettler wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2015-02-09 at 14:51 +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
What if with --buffer-size=256 or --buffer-size=192, i.e. align buffer
>>>
At Mon, 9 Feb 2015 15:17:23 +0100,
Tino Mettler wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2015-02-09 at 15:14 +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > At Mon, 9 Feb 2015 15:06:14 +0100,
> > Tino Mettler wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, 2015-02-09 at 14:51 +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
>
> > > > What if with --buffer-size=256 or --buffer
On Mon, 2015-02-09 at 15:14 +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> At Mon, 9 Feb 2015 15:06:14 +0100,
> Tino Mettler wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 2015-02-09 at 14:51 +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > > What if with --buffer-size=256 or --buffer-size=192, i.e. align buffer
> > > size and period size?
> >
> > Only 1
At Mon, 9 Feb 2015 15:06:14 +0100,
Tino Mettler wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2015-02-09 at 14:51 +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > At Tue, 10 Feb 2015 00:16:36 +1100,
> > Bruce wrote:
> > >
> > > Ok. Huge progress.
> > > Works for me too !
> > >
> > > To get the 96k playback working too, I used :
> > > aplay
On 10/02/2015 1:06 AM, Tino Mettler wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-02-09 at 14:51 +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
>> At Tue, 10 Feb 2015 00:16:36 +1100,
>> Bruce wrote:
>>> Ok. Huge progress.
>>> Works for me too !
>>>
>>> To get the 96k playback working too, I used :
>>> aplay --buffer-size=128
>>> Then it soun
On Mon, 2015-02-09 at 14:51 +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> At Tue, 10 Feb 2015 00:16:36 +1100,
> Bruce wrote:
> >
> > Ok. Huge progress.
> > Works for me too !
> >
> > To get the 96k playback working too, I used :
> > aplay --buffer-size=128
> > Then it sounds perfect.
> > (Also -B 1250 works)
>
>
At Tue, 10 Feb 2015 00:16:36 +1100,
Bruce wrote:
>
> Ok. Huge progress.
> Works for me too !
>
> To get the 96k playback working too, I used :
> aplay --buffer-size=128
> Then it sounds perfect.
> (Also -B 1250 works)
What if with --buffer-size=256 or --buffer-size=192, i.e. align buffer
size an
Ok. Huge progress.
Works for me too !
To get the 96k playback working too, I used :
aplay --buffer-size=128
Then it sounds perfect.
(Also -B 1250 works)
The weird channel mapping stuff continues in hdspmixer, so this is an
unrelated problem. I suspect my C code will be unaffected.
In my code I s
On Mon, 2015-02-09 at 09:18 +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> At Mon, 09 Feb 2015 16:28:23 +1100,
> Bruce wrote:
> >
> > Hi Adrian,
> >
> > OK. I have made some progress !
> > I now have good sound using *jackd*. I have managed to get this working
> > at both single and double speed.
> > There are so
At Mon, 09 Feb 2015 16:28:23 +1100,
Bruce wrote:
>
> Hi Adrian,
>
> OK. I have made some progress !
> I now have good sound using *jackd*. I have managed to get this working
> at both single and double speed.
> There are some weirdnesses I can't explain (below), however.
>
> Where does this lea
Hi Adrian,
OK. I have made some progress !
I now have good sound using *jackd*. I have managed to get this working
at both single and double speed.
There are some weirdnesses I can't explain (below), however.
Where does this leave us wrt alsa vanilla alsa playpack ?
On 8/02/2015 8:14 AM, Adri
On 7/02/2015 3:31 AM, Adrian Knoth wrote:
And we really need that jackd test to sort out userspace. ;)
I attempted this today.
Aologies in advance, having never dealt wth jackd before I'm a complete
novice here.
Installed jackd packages, and VLC (a typical jack client ?).
*jackd -dalsa* com
At Fri, 6 Feb 2015 16:35:25 +0100,
Tino Mettler wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2015-02-05 at 17:01 +0100, Mettler, Tino (ALC NetworX GmbH)
> wrote:
> > > Am 05.02.2015 um 15:42 schrieb Takashi Iwai :
> > >
> > > Larger rewrites of the hdspm code started since 1.0.24. Especially
> > > lots of intrusive chang
On Thu, 2015-02-05 at 17:01 +0100, Mettler, Tino (ALC NetworX GmbH)
wrote:
> > Am 05.02.2015 um 15:42 schrieb Takashi Iwai :
> >
> > Larger rewrites of the hdspm code started since 1.0.24. Especially
> > lots of intrusive changes have been made between 1.0.24 and 1.0.25.
> > So, my wild guess is
On Fri, 06 Feb 2015 14:54:28 +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
>I'm confused... Does openSUSE 11.2 work or not?
My apologies, I don't use this RME card. The RME card I'm using wasn't
supported and even not sold that time. I just wanted to hint at the
typo ;).
Bruce didn't reply to the list. I guess it'
At Fri, 6 Feb 2015 14:34:06 +0100,
Ralf Mardorf wrote:
>
> On Fri, 06 Feb 2015 23:11:54 +1100, Bruce wrote:
> >Suse 11 with kernel 11.3.22 and alsa 1.0.18 doesn't work for me.
> ^^ that's a typo, Suse 11.3 yes, kernel 11.3 no :)
>
> [rocketmouse@archlinux ~]$ ls -hAl /mnt/sus
On Fri, 06 Feb 2015 23:11:54 +1100, Bruce wrote:
>Suse 11 with kernel 11.3.22 and alsa 1.0.18 doesn't work for me.
^^ that's a typo, Suse 11.3 yes, kernel 11.3 no :)
[rocketmouse@archlinux ~]$ ls -hAl /mnt/suse11.2/boot/vmlinuz-*
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 4.0M Oct 27
2009 /mnt/su
On 6/02/2015 5:45 PM, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> working and non-working kernel versions.
>> Yes, Problem 1/ was tested on the same physical hardware with different
>> hard drives with different kernels.
>> System that works (Suse 10) with alsa 1.0.15 is 2.6.16.46-0.12-smp and
>> 2.6.16.60-0.85.1-smp
On Fri, 2015-02-06 at 12:03 +0100, Adrian Knoth wrote:
> I'm lost. Can we get a fresh proper test case?
>
>- current kernel (your 3.18.x is fine)
>- up-to-date distro (your Arch should be good)
>- running with jackd
I didn't use jack, but this test setup:
- Debian unstable with Kern
Hello Folks.
I'm tired to Install Sound driver and after BIOS upgrade, My linux can't detect
sound card.Please see below link to know the details of my problem :
http://www.pastebin.ca/2905010
Thanks.
--
Dive into the
At Fri, 06 Feb 2015 17:27:58 +1100,
Bruce wrote:
>
> >> Hi Tino,
> >>
> >> That's interesting. Great to see some confirmation at last and that I'm
> >> not suffering some sort of weird 3 year long delusion :)
> > Well, it would have been better to be reported at the right time at
> > the right pla
Hi Tino,
That's interesting. Great to see some confirmation at last and that I'm
not suffering some sort of weird 3 year long delusion :)
Well, it would have been better to be reported at the right time at
the right place. alsa-users ML isn't always the best place for
reporting regressions. Pl
At Fri, 06 Feb 2015 02:01:02 +1100,
Bruce wrote:
>
> On 6/02/2015 1:29 AM, Tino Mettler wrote:
> > On Thu, 2015-02-05 at 14:56 +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> >
> >> looking at the code diff between 1.0.15 and 1.0.18, there is no
> >> significant changes in hdspm.c, and most of them are just typo fix
At Thu, 5 Feb 2015 16:01:16 +,
Mettler, Tino (ALC NetworX GmbH) wrote:
>
> > Am 05.02.2015 um 15:42 schrieb Takashi Iwai :
> >
> > Larger rewrites of the hdspm code started since 1.0.24. Especially
> > lots of intrusive changes have been made between 1.0.24 and 1.0.25.
> > So, my wild guess
> Am 05.02.2015 um 15:42 schrieb Takashi Iwai :
>
> Larger rewrites of the hdspm code started since 1.0.24. Especially
> lots of intrusive changes have been made between 1.0.24 and 1.0.25.
> So, my wild guess is that it started broken in 1.0.25 release.
Hi, I tried Debian 7 which uses 1.0.24 and
On 6/02/2015 1:29 AM, Tino Mettler wrote:
On Thu, 2015-02-05 at 14:56 +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
looking at the code diff between 1.0.15 and 1.0.18, there is no
significant changes in hdspm.c, and most of them are just typo fixes
and core-side API cleanup that is irrelevant with HDSPM
functiona
At Thu, 5 Feb 2015 15:29:07 +0100,
Tino Mettler wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2015-02-05 at 14:56 +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
>
> > looking at the code diff between 1.0.15 and 1.0.18, there is no
> > significant changes in hdspm.c, and most of them are just typo fixes
> > and core-side API cleanup that is ir
On Thu, 2015-02-05 at 14:56 +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> looking at the code diff between 1.0.15 and 1.0.18, there is no
> significant changes in hdspm.c, and most of them are just typo fixes
> and core-side API cleanup that is irrelevant with HDSPM
> functionality.
Hi,
as Bruce seems to have th
At Fri, 6 Feb 2015 00:39:29 +1100,
Bruce wrote:
>
> Hi Takashi,
>
> I know it doesn't work with 1.0.18.
>
> I haven't tried 1.0.16 or 1.0.17. I'm not sure exactly at what stage the
> kernel hooks changed, and that meant a change of test distribution.
> Others kept telling me the driver definitel
At Thu, 05 Feb 2015 20:53:44 +1100,
Bruce wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Is there anyone willing to spend *some time* helping me out with a
> long-term problem I've been having with an RME eMADI setup ?
>
> The problem appears to be non-trivial and will require knowledge of RME
> cards, and the alsa drive
Hi,
Is there anyone willing to spend *some time* helping me out with a
long-term problem I've been having with an RME eMADI setup ?
The problem appears to be non-trivial and will require knowledge of RME
cards, and the alsa drivers for it.
Willing to pay the right person for their efforts. I'
36 matches
Mail list logo
