Frank Barknecht <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Isn't the capabilities patch considered as a security risk by the
> kernel folks? I never understood, why, tough. At least a
> configure-option would be nice.
Yes, it is. I don't know why either, but I believe it has something
to do with CAP_SETPCAP,
Hallo,
Jack O'Quin hat gesagt: // Jack O'Quin wrote:
> Downloaded 2.6.0-test7 to check, and that code is still present.
> Someone said recently that capabilities were enabled in 2.6, but it
> looks like the patch is still required. Sigh!
Isn't the capabilities patch considered as a security risk
Mark Constable <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, 2 Nov 2003 03:38 pm, Jack O'Quin wrote:
> > > For a 2.4 kernel you needed to patch include/linux/capability.h as
> > > follows...
> > >
> > > #define CAP_INIT_EFF_SETto_cap_t(~0)
> > > #define CAP_INIT_INH_SETto_cap_t(~0)
> > >
> > >
On Sun, 2 Nov 2003 03:38 pm, Jack O'Quin wrote:
> > For a 2.4 kernel you needed to patch include/linux/capability.h as
> > follows...
> >
> > #define CAP_INIT_EFF_SETto_cap_t(~0)
> > #define CAP_INIT_INH_SETto_cap_t(~0)
> >
> > where the original values were...
> >
> > #define CAP_INI
"Jack O'Quin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Mark Constable <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Would anyone have any idea what settings I need to tweak
> > for ALSA built into a 2.6 kernel to avoid this problem ?
>
> This question just came up, and I don't know the answer.
>
> For a 2.4 kernel yo
Mark Constable <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Would anyone have any idea what settings I need to tweak
> for ALSA built into a 2.6 kernel to avoid this problem ?
This question just came up, and I don't know the answer.
For a 2.4 kernel you needed to patch include/linux/capability.h as
follows...
Would anyone have any idea what settings I need to tweak
for ALSA built into a 2.6 kernel to avoid this problem ?
gw ~ jackstart -R -d alsa -d hw
jackstart: cannot get realtime capabilities, current capabilities are:
=ep cap_setpcap-ep
probably running under a kernel with capabiliti
