On Wednesday 21 August 2002 02:57 pm, Scott Bronson wrote:
> I posted the solution to this a few days ago.
And it's the third time since then (that I can remember) that this problem has
come up.
Perhaps someone should fix this problem in the releases so it quits coming up?
--
On Saturday 21 August 1999 03:06 am, ashendra singh wrote:
> i've install the latest alsa mods on my suse 7.0 system (kernel 2.4.18) and
> have working sound. i would like to use oss applications but they complain
> about no /dev/dsp (it is there however) what wrong? this is what a lsmod
/dev/dsp
> Also, I have sound in KDE already. So if I wanted to
> use anything written for ALSA, I'd have to ditch my
> current driver?
No, you can KEEP Arts in KDE (actually, I just turn it off, Alsa's smart
enough to handle things sent it's way). This is one of the ADVANTAGES of
using Alsa vs OSS/Free
On Tuesday 20 August 2002 08:26 am, Marco Nadal wrote:
> I have just tried
> rpm -i alsa-2.2.19_0.5.10b-6.4mdk.i586.rpm
> error: failed dependencies:
> kernel = 2.2.19-6.4mdk is needed by alsa-2.2.19_0.5.10b-6.4mdk
>
> This is most enlightening, I have the wrong kernel!
> I had a look at
On Tuesday 20 August 2002 12:13 am, Luke Hammer wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've been trying to compile alsa-drivers-0.9.0rc3 on my RedHat 7.3
> system, and the compilation dies with the following errors:
>
>
>
<>
I had the same problems.. In fac, just Saturday or Sunday (I forget which),
this solution w
>
> Try 'modprobe snd-ens1371' :)
>
Actually, for some damned reason, the Ensoniq card requires the Free OSS mixer
junk **boggle**.
Oddly enough, before adding all that, I got /dev/dsp no such device errors.
**shrug**
Now to go through and rebuild everything to use alsa instead of OSS.
--
> Personally I'd suggest that a compile failure merits updating the
> tarballs on the front page - 0.9.0rc3a or something like that - because
> compilation failures are guaranteed to put people off ALSA for good.
> Personally I'd suggest that a compile failure merits updating the
> tarballs on th
On Sunday 18 August 2002 05:24 pm, Frans Ketelaars wrote:
> *** N.B. The 0.5.x series is considered deprecated and is no longer
> supported by ALSA developers ***
Sadly, the Release Candidates don't even compile on all machines
--
