Re: [Alsa-user] Higher quality dmix resampling

2009-05-16 Thread Paolo Saggese
On Saturday 16 May 2009, Grant wrote: > >> If it's the latter (as usually is on modern systems), then its just > >> the input interface that changes, you're goin' trough ALSA anyway. > > Also, I should mention something that contradicts this. When I define > a "format" for dmix in /etc/asound.co

Re: [Alsa-user] Higher quality dmix resampling

2009-05-16 Thread Grant
>>> > So how come that you don't get 'em with mpd?! >>> >>> In mpd I specify oss instead of alsa.  If I specify alsa and involve >>> dmix, I get static in mpd too. >> >> you say OSS... but was that the "real" oss (does it still exist for >> modern kernels/hardware?!) or was it just the ALSA oss emu

Re: [Alsa-user] Higher quality dmix resampling

2009-05-16 Thread Grant
>> > So how come that you don't get 'em with mpd?! >> >> In mpd I specify oss instead of alsa.  If I specify alsa and involve >> dmix, I get static in mpd too. > > you say OSS... but was that the "real" oss (does it still exist for > modern kernels/hardware?!) or was it just the ALSA oss emulation?

Re: [Alsa-user] Higher quality dmix resampling

2009-05-16 Thread Paolo Saggese
On Friday 15 May 2009, Grant wrote: > > So how come that you don't get 'em with mpd?! > > In mpd I specify oss instead of alsa. If I specify alsa and involve > dmix, I get static in mpd too. you say OSS... but was that the "real" oss (does it still exist for modern kernels/hardware?!) or was it