On Tue, 27 Nov 2007, Mark Constable wrote:
> On 2007-11-27 01:19 pm, Bill Unruh wrote:
>>> A point is that these kind of "hearing tests" are almost
>>> useless in absolute terms but are indeed meaningful when
>>> tested and accumulated results are compared with for any
>>> particular individual. T
On 2007-11-27 01:19 pm, Bill Unruh wrote:
> > A point is that these kind of "hearing tests" are almost
> > useless in absolute terms but are indeed meaningful when
> > tested and accumulated results are compared with for any
> > particular individual. The consistent mean is to set up
> > the listen
On Tue, 27 Nov 2007, Mark Constable wrote:
> On 2007-11-27 12:22 pm, Rene Herman wrote:
>> Mmm, and now that I look at it again:
>> ampl = 32767.0 / pow(10, -dbfs / 20);
>> is the same as:
>> ampl = 32767 * pow(10, dbfs / 20);
>> which looks somewhat nicer.
>
> How about a copyright,
On Tue, 27 Nov 2007, Rene Herman wrote:
> On 26-11-07 21:25, James Courtier-Dutton wrote:
>
>> Rene Herman wrote:
>
>> > On 25-11-07 04:18, Mark Constable wrote:
>> >
>> > > There are a few online hearing test sites around, here
>> > > is one with 16/44.1 wavs. I can't hear 12kHz-0dB.wav :-(
On 2007-11-27 12:22 pm, Rene Herman wrote:
> Mmm, and now that I look at it again:
> ampl = 32767.0 / pow(10, -dbfs / 20);
> is the same as:
> ampl = 32767 * pow(10, dbfs / 20);
> which looks somewhat nicer.
How about a copyright, license, contact and version info,
and a bit of a re
On 27-11-07 02:48, Rene Herman wrote:
> Yes, well, I was feeling manly...
>
> But the main utility should, admittedly, mostly be the source. Tiny and
> intended to be sort of instructive in the dBFS -> Amplitude step and such.
Mmm, and now that I look at it again:
ampl = 32767.0 / pow(
On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 02:48:20 +0100
Rene Herman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 27-11-07 02:41, Sergei Steshenko wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 02:26:48 +0100
> > Rene Herman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > [snip]
> >> Wrote a small sine generator during this test by the way -- attached just
On 27-11-07 02:41, Sergei Steshenko wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 02:26:48 +0100
> Rene Herman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [snip]
>> Wrote a small sine generator during this test by the way -- attached just in
>> case anyone is interested. Writes S16_LE to stdout, so intended to be used
>> as
On 27-11-07 02:26, Rene Herman wrote:
Wrote a small sine generator during this test by the way -- attached
just in case anyone is interested. Writes S16_LE to stdout, so intended
to be used as:
$ sine -f -d | aplay -f cd
-r for setting a different rate than 44100:
$ sine -f -d -r | ap
On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 02:26:48 +0100
Rene Herman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
> Wrote a small sine generator during this test by the way -- attached just in
> case anyone is interested. Writes S16_LE to stdout, so intended to be used as:
>
> $ sine -f -d | aplay -f cd
>
> -r for setting a
On 26-11-07 21:25, James Courtier-Dutton wrote:
Rene Herman wrote:
On 25-11-07 04:18, Mark Constable wrote:
There are a few online hearing test sites around, here
is one with 16/44.1 wavs. I can't hear 12kHz-0dB.wav :-(
http://www.phys.unsw.edu.au/music/dB/loudness.html
Word of warning --
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007, Sergei Steshenko wrote:
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 10:52:17 -0800 (PST)
Bill Unruh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007, Sergei Steshenko wrote:
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 18:19:24 +0100
Benoit Rouits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Le dimanche 25 novembre 2007 à 18:26 +0300, V
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007, James Courtier-Dutton wrote:
> Rene Herman wrote:
>> On 25-11-07 04:18, Mark Constable wrote:
>>
>>> There are a few online hearing test sites around, here
>>> is one with 16/44.1 wavs. I can't hear 12kHz-0dB.wav :-(
>>>
>>> http://www.phys.unsw.edu.au/music/dB/loudness.html
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 20:25:33 +
James Courtier-Dutton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Rene Herman wrote:
> > On 25-11-07 04:18, Mark Constable wrote:
> >
> >> There are a few online hearing test sites around, here
> >> is one with 16/44.1 wavs. I can't hear 12kHz-0dB.wav :-(
> >>
> >> http://www
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 10:52:17 -0800 (PST)
Bill Unruh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Nov 2007, Sergei Steshenko wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 18:19:24 +0100
> > Benoit Rouits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Le dimanche 25 novembre 2007 à 18:26 +0300, Vladimir Mosgalin a écrit :
> >>
Rene Herman wrote:
> On 25-11-07 04:18, Mark Constable wrote:
>
>> There are a few online hearing test sites around, here
>> is one with 16/44.1 wavs. I can't hear 12kHz-0dB.wav :-(
>>
>> http://www.phys.unsw.edu.au/music/dB/loudness.html
>
> Word of warning -- the outcome here will significantl
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007, Sergei Steshenko wrote:
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 18:19:24 +0100
Benoit Rouits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Le dimanche 25 novembre 2007 à 18:26 +0300, Vladimir Mosgalin a écrit :
That's the main reason why I asked - I heard that people can hear
22khz or about that when they are
I have tried all model listed in
/usr/src/KERNEL_VERSION/Document/sound/alsa with no luck. I have tried
alsa all alsa model with position_fix=1 but i still have no sound.
Can anyone help me ?
Dmitri Pogosyan a écrit :
> That's no problem by itself.
>
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I have an Asus A7T lap
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 18:19:24 +0100
Benoit Rouits <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Le dimanche 25 novembre 2007 à 18:26 +0300, Vladimir Mosgalin a écrit :
> > That's the main reason why I asked - I heard that people can hear
> > 22khz or about that when they are young, than listening gets worse and
> >
Le dimanche 25 novembre 2007 à 18:26 +0300, Vladimir Mosgalin a écrit :
> That's the main reason why I asked - I heard that people can hear
> 22khz or about that when they are young, than listening gets worse and
> they don't hear very high frequencies anymore - and since I consider
> myself still
On Sunday 25 November 2007 19:08, Wolfgang P. Rauchholz wrote:
Hi Wolfgang. Please don't use HTML when replying to the list.
Looking at the output from when you ran the script, some stuff seems to be
missing. For example alsa-lib is not installed, and the only snd module
loaded is the snd-intel
Hello.
I post to ask if there is any progress on this bug ?
I saw the bug some time ago but it still exists on 2.6.24-rc2 and it is
annoying to run "rmmod snd-hda-intel" before i need to power off the machine.
My motherboard is not the same as the original poster's.
Mine is the Asus P5AD2 Premium
On 26-11-07 03:35, Bill Unruh wrote:
>> [ the loudness war ]
>> Clipping nor analogue distortion by the way is the problem. As said,
>> it's the range compression to _avoid_ the clipping that they have to
>> do when they master at these insane averages -- when you then later
>> play them back
23 matches
Mail list logo
