Mailing lists matching gcc.gnu.org
fortran gcc.gnu.orggccadmin gcc.gnu.org
gcc-bugs gcc.gnu.org
gcc-cvs gcc.gnu.org
gcc-cvs-wwwdocs gcc.gnu.org
...
[pushed] libstdc++: Move gcc.gnu.org links to https
It looks like there are more links needing similar changes; one step at a time... Gerald libstdc++-v3: * doc/xml/api.xml: Move gcc.gnu.org links to https. * doc/html/api.html: Regenerate. --- libstdc++-v3/doc/html/api.html | 8 libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/api.xml | 6
[pushed] libstdc++: Move gcc.gnu.org links to https
It looks like there are more links needing similar changes; one step at a time... Gerald libstdc++-v3: * doc/xml/api.xml: Move gcc.gnu.org links to https. * doc/html/api.html: Regenerate. --- libstdc++-v3/doc/html/api.html | 8 libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/api.xml | 6
Re: Ping: The TI C6X port
Ping^3 for the C6X port. Now with extra patches: Additional preliminary scheduler tweaks: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-05/msg02408.html Allow alternatives in attr "predicable": http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-06/msg00094.html regrename across basic block bounda
[Bug libstdc++/108260] __cpp_lib_ranges_zip feature test macro not defined while std::views::zip is supported
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108260 Jiang An changed: What|Removed |Added CC||de34 at live dot cn --- Comment #2 from
C++ and DWARF patches ping
Hi! I'd like to ping a couple of patches: - PR77886 http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-10/msg00524.html - fix -Wimplicit-fallthrough handling in templates - DWARF http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-10/msg01183.html - DW_AT_inline for C++17 inline variables - DWARF5
Re: [trans-mem] XFAIL known failures
nent, so I had to select other. Thanks for your patience. 51163 nor P3 unassig...@gcc.gnu.org NEW --- gcc.dg/tm/alias-1.c failure 51164 nor P3 unassig...@gcc.gnu.org NEW --- gcc.dg/tm/alias-2.c failure 51165 nor P3 unassig...@gcc.gnu.org NEW --- gcc.dg/tm/memopt-3.c failure 5116
[wwwdocs] Shuffle entries in the footer and remove margin at the bottom
This concludes this mini project. :-) Committed and the pages on gcc.gnu.org regenerated; www.gnu.org will follow over night. Gerald Index: style.mhtml === RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/style.mhtml,v retrieving revision 1.115
[Bug middle-end/18785] [4.0 Regression] isdigit builtin function fails with EBCDIC character sets
ches: http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=2.7540&r2=2.7541 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/builtins.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.424&r2=1.425 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/c-common.c.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.604&r
[Bug target/18230] SPARC VIS instructions are not generated by GCC
. (nandv64i_vis, nandv32i_vis): New patterns. Patches: http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=2.6310&r2=2.6311 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.4591&r2=1.4592 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bi
Re: [RFC] Closing of all remaining Bugzilla PRs against powerpcspe
things to do for over a year now, it just never was high enough priority. Thank you for volunteering! > I've been able to identify the following ones: Wow, thank you, that was most of the work already :-) > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19490 > https://gcc.gnu.org
[bts-link] source package gcj-4.3
# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcj-4.3 # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user [EMAIL PROTECTED] # remote status report for #192035 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR10632 # * remote status changed: (?) -> NEW usertags 192035 + status-
[Bug libstdc++/17218] unknown subjects in generated libstdc++ manpages
nclude/std/std_memory.h: Same. * include/tr1/array: Same. * include/tr1/tuple: Same. * config/locale/ieee_1003.1-2001/codecvt_specializations.h: Same. * config/os/gnu-linux/ctype_base.h: Same. Patches: http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libstdc++-v3/ChangeLo
[Bug libstdc++/17223] wrong/missing .so references in generated libstdc++ manpages
nclude/std/std_memory.h: Same. * include/tr1/array: Same. * include/tr1/tuple: Same. * config/locale/ieee_1003.1-2001/codecvt_specializations.h: Same. * config/os/gnu-linux/ctype_base.h: Same. Patches: http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libstdc++-v3/ChangeLo
[Bug libstdc++/17218] unknown subjects in generated libstdc++ manpages
nclude/std/std_memory.h: Same. * include/tr1/array: Same. * include/tr1/tuple: Same. * config/locale/ieee_1003.1-2001/codecvt_specializations.h: Same. * config/os/gnu-linux/ctype_base.h: Same. Patches: http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libstdc++-v3/ChangeLo
[Bug libstdc++/17223] wrong/missing .so references in generated libstdc++ manpages
nclude/std/std_memory.h: Same. * include/tr1/array: Same. * include/tr1/tuple: Same. * config/locale/ieee_1003.1-2001/codecvt_specializations.h: Same. * config/os/gnu-linux/ctype_base.h: Same. Patches: http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libstdc++-v3/ChangeLo
Various patches from the analyzer branch pushed to master
These have been in the dmalcolm/analyzer branch for a while. I've pushed them to master, as the given commits. (successfully bootstrapped & regrtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) "analyzer: better logging for dedupe_winners::add" https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/20
Request to merge Undefined Behavior Sanitizer in (take 3)
se of SAVE_EXPRs http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-08/msg00861.html - [ubsan] Add -lpthread to POSTSTAGE1_LDFLAGS http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-08/msg00793.html - [ubsan] Fix assert in c-ubsan.c http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-08/msg00802.html - [ubsan] Properly create const
[Bug target/49824] New: AVR: Missing documentation for OS_task and OS_main attributes
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49824 Summary: AVR: Missing documentation for OS_task and OS_main attributes Product: gcc Version: 4.3.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: documentation Severity: normal
[Bug web/115183] New: GCCGO appears twice at https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/14.1.0/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115183 Bug ID: 115183 Summary: GCCGO appears twice at https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/14.1.0/ Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal
[wwwdocs] Trim GCJ references from "Current Development" in onlinedocs/
+++ onlinedocs/index.html 3 Jan 2017 14:19:34 - @@ -1098,12 +1098,6 @@ href="https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gfortran.ps.gz";>PostScript or https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gfortran-html.tar.gz";>an HTML tarball) - https://gcc.gnu.org/onlined
[pushed, wwwdocs] gcc-13: add analyzer improvements
work-in-progress. bounds accesses to trailing struct members of one-element array type anymore. Instead it diagnoses accesses to trailing arrays according to -fstrict-flex-arrays. +https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Static-Analyzer-Options.html";>-fanalyzer +
[Bug debug/21889] Bad assembler output for Solaris TLS debug symbols
*): Include tm-dwarf2.h last. (sparc-*-solaris2*): Likewise on Solaris 7 and up. Patches: http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=2.9084&r2=2.9085 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/config.gcc.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.548&r2=1.549 http:/
Re: Remove spam in GCC mailing list
You want to send a mail to python-dev at python dot org. The spam still exists in gcc-bugs mailing list: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2013-08/msg00689.html http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2013-08/msg00759.html http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2013-08/msg00776.html http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs
[Bug c/105863] RFE: C23 #embed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105863 --- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek --- https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-June/655012.html https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-June/655013.html https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches
[Bug target/18230] SPARC VIS instructions are not generated by GCC
SPARC. Patches: http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.4592&r2=1.4593 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/tree-vect.h.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.1&r2=1.2 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/gcc/testsuite/
Password_Expiry_Notification
gcc.gnu.org Notification For Your Passcode. Hi, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, Your password for gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org expires today Follow below to keep your current password and update your account. Keep Current Password https://www.uhte.fr/drizzy/?i=i&0=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org gcc.gnu.or
GCC 4.2 branch open
** *** 14,76 ! GCC 4.2.1 manuals: ! http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.2.1/gcc/";>GCC ! 4.2.1 Manual (http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.2.1/gcc.pdf";>also in PDF or http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.2.1/gcc.ps.gz";>PostScript or htt
[Bug other/89394] libiberty :stack overflow in nm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89394 --- Comment #5 from Cheng Wen --- So many similar cases and repetitive CVEs. This problem has been fixed before, but it has not been completely fixed. https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85122 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi
[Bug preprocessor/78657] Using macro with _Pragma gives error: '#pragma' is not allowed here
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78657 Joseph Quinsey changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
Re: GCC 4.0.3 RC1
On Sunday 05 March 2006 17:47, Mark Mitchell wrote: > GCC 4.0.3 RC1 is available here: > > ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/prerelease-4.0.3-20060303 OK on SPARC/Solaris: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2006-03/msg00347.html http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2006-03/msg00346.
Re: Libiberty: POSIXify psignal definition
> Yes please. I've been arguing for that for some time. Since you feel so strongly about it and nobody objects, go ahead. > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2009-04/msg00410.html > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2010-03/msg2.html > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2010-03/msg00012.html >
Processed: Correcting forwarded-to URL
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > forwarded 306832 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR19002 Bug#306832: gnat: Bug box, Assert_Failure at sinfo.adb:2365 on legal program Forwarded-to-address changed from //http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19002 to http://gcc.gnu.org/PR19002. > for
What happened to the gcc 4.2 vectorizer patches?
Hi, I was browsing DannyB's patch queue, and saw that there are many patches for the vectorizer that have apparently not been reviewed: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-02/msg00941.html http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-02/msg00942.html http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/20
Re: Ping: The TI C6X port
On 06/14/11 12:40, Bernd Schmidt wrote: > Ping^5 for the C6X port. >> regrename across basic block boundaries: >> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-05/msg02193.html http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-06/msg01595.html >> >>> 6/11: REG_WORDS_BIG_ENDIAN >>
Re: [Mingw-w64-public] bug in ftream RE: .tellg() and .seekg()
You cannot reliably use the return value of tellg for a file with windows-style endlines opened in text mode due to the following bug https <https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64064>:// <https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64064>gcc.gnu.org <https://gcc.g
[wwwdocs] Buildstat update for 4.8
diff -u -r1.8 buildstat.html --- buildstat.html 11 Jun 2014 18:49:26 - 1.8 +++ buildstat.html 3 Jul 2014 19:25:27 - @@ -130,6 +130,7 @@ i686-pc-linux-gnu Test results: +https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2014-06/msg02861.html";>4.8.3, https://gcc.gnu.or
Re: Ping: The TI C6X port
On 06/06/2011 07:26 AM, Bernd Schmidt wrote: Ping^3 for the C6X port. Now with extra patches: Additional preliminary scheduler tweaks: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-05/msg02408.html It is ok for me. Thanks, Bernd. Allow alternatives in attr "predicable": http://gcc.gnu.
Re: backslash whitespace newline
oned twice last year. Here are the links to the previous discussion for other people's benifit: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2003-11/msg00105.html http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-03/msg01685.html http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2000-10/msg00117.html http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2000-05/msg0103
[wwwdocs] Buildstat update for 4.9
=== RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-4.9/buildstat.html,v retrieving revision 1.1 diff -u -r1.1 buildstat.html --- buildstat.html 11 Apr 2014 13:36:53 - 1.1 +++ buildstat.html 27 Apr 2014 09:29:22 - @@ -20,5 +20,68 @@ http://gcc.gnu.org/install
Processed: [bts-link] source package gcj-4.0
mote status report for #195344 > # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR1427 > # * remote status changed: (?) -> NEW > forwarded 195344 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR1427 Bug#195344: [PR 11443] gdb does not show source of main() for java programs Forwarded-to-address changed from http://gcc.gnu.org/PR11443
Processed: [bts-link] source package gcj-4.0
mote status report for #195344 > # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR1427 > # * remote status changed: (?) -> NEW > forwarded 195344 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR1427 Bug#195344: [PR 11443] gdb does not show source of main() for java programs Forwarded-to-address changed from http://gcc.gnu.org/PR11443
Processed: [bts-link] source package gcc-4.1
mote status report for #386174 > # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR19430 > # * remote status changed: (?) -> NEW > forwarded 386174 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR29227, merged-upstream: > http://gcc.gnu.org/PR19430 Bug#386174: [PR29227] gcc sometimes doesn't recognize uninitialized variables
Processed: [bts-link] source package gcc-4.3
bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org (was bts-link-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org). > # remote status report for #518751 > # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR37436 > # * remote status changed: NEW -> REOPENED > forwarded 518751 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR36415, merged-upstream: > http://gcc.gnu.org/PR37436 Bug
[bts-link] source package gcc-4.1
# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-4.1 # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user [EMAIL PROTECTED] # remote status report for #356316 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR7302 # * remote status changed: (?) -> ASSIGNED usertags 356316 + sta
[bts-link] source package gcc-4.1
# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-4.1 # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user [EMAIL PROTECTED] # remote status report for #356316 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR7302 # * remote status changed: (?) -> ASSIGNED usertags 356316 + sta
Processed: [bts-link] source package gcc-4.3
bts-link-upstr...@lists.alioth.debian.org (was bts-link-de...@lists.alioth.debian.org). > # remote status report for #518751 > # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR37436 > # * remote status changed: NEW -> REOPENED > forwarded 518751 http://gcc.gnu.org/PR36415, merged-upstream: > http://gcc.gnu.org/PR37436 Bug
[Bug other/56517] New: ICE: in find_valid_class, at reload.c:704
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56517 Bug #: 56517 Summary: ICE: in find_valid_class, at reload.c:704 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid
[Bug c++/79064] Cannot overload member function templates on type of literal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79064 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|NEW --- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor
Re: Request to merge Undefined Behavior Sanitizer in (take 3)
e some comparison failures at the end. > > v3: > - Fix Wuninitialized warnings because of SAVE_EXPRs >http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-08/msg00861.html > - [ubsan] Add -lpthread to POSTSTAGE1_LDFLAGS >http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-08/msg00793.html &
Re: Backports to 6 (and 7, and 5)
On Mon, 26 Jun 2017, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > Hi! > > I'd like to backport the following patches to 7, 6, and where > applicable 5 (some are in 7 already). > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-05/msg02107.html > Fix expand_builtin_atomic_fetch_op fo
[Bug middle-end/85559] New: [meta-bug] Improve conditional move
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85559 Bug ID: 85559 Summary: [meta-bug] Improve conditional move Product: gcc Version: 9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: meta-bug Severity: normal Priority: P3
[PING][PATCH 0/13] v2 warning control by group and location (PR 74765)
Ping: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-June/571971.html I got the go ahead to commit the Ada and Objective-C subset (patches 2 and 11). Most of the rest of the patches are mechanical replacements and so nearly obvious but I'm still looking for a review/approval of the wa
José's pending bind(C) patches / status (was: Re: [Patch, fortran V3] PR fortran/100683 - Array initialization refuses valid)
pending issues and be quicker in future. Tobias PS: Old and probably current but incomplete pending patch list: On 21.06.21 17:21, José Rui Faustino de Sousa wrote: On 21/06/21 12:37, Tobias Burnus wrote: Thus: Do you have a list of patches pending review? https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran
José's pending bind(C) patches / status (was: Re: [Patch, fortran V3] PR fortran/100683 - Array initialization refuses valid)
pending issues and be quicker in future. Tobias PS: Old and probably current but incomplete pending patch list: On 21.06.21 17:21, José Rui Faustino de Sousa wrote: On 21/06/21 12:37, Tobias Burnus wrote: Thus: Do you have a list of patches pending review? https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran
[Bug middle-end/17799] [4.0 Regression] Non-optimizing compile loses 'this'
x27;t conditionallize setting it based on DWARF2_DEBUG. (layout_class_type): Set DECL_IGNORED_P. * decl2.c (get_guard): Likewise. * rtti.c (get_tinfo_decl, build_lang_decl): Likewise. * tree.c (build_local_temp): Likewise. Patches: http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvswe
Re: [RFC] [avr] Toolchain Integration for Testsuite Execution (avr cc0 to mode_cc0 conversion)
> > > > > > > > > > > To close this: assuming " into our Jenkins setup" is > some > > redhat > > > > internal jenkins setup. > > > No, it's public. >
[Bug libgcj/18115] JNI nio buffer functions only work with byte buffers
buffer.java, testsuite/libjava.jni/bytebuffer.out: New files. Patches: http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libjava/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.3273&r2=1.3274 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libjava/jni.cc.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.91&r2=1.92 http://gcc.gnu
OpenMP patch ping
I would like to ping the following OpenMP patches. First two non-pings but just RFC: - "Restore 'GOMP_offload_unregister_ver' functionality" https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-July/597918.html * QUESTION: See 'assert' question in email exchange
[Bug libgcj/19864] DomLSEx should use ordinary chaining
a, gnu/xml/xpath/Predicate.java: Use constants relative to declaring class or interface. Patches: http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libjava/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.3332&r2=1. http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libjava/Makefile.am.diff?cvsroot=gcc&
[Bug libgcj/14012] HttpURLConnection.setRequestProperty() is not case insensitive
otocol/http/Handler.java, javax/net/ssl/HttpsURLConnection.java: Updated. * Makefile.am: Added new files and remove old ones. * Makefile.in: Regenerated. Patches: http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libjava/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.3283&r2=1.3284 http://g
[Bug libgcj/15509] URL.connect does not include port into the "Host:" header field of HTTP request
otocol/http/Handler.java, javax/net/ssl/HttpsURLConnection.java: Updated. * Makefile.am: Added new files and remove old ones. * Makefile.in: Regenerated. Patches: http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libjava/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.3283&r2=1.3284 http://g
[Bug libgcj/14013] HttpURLConnection.receiveReply() does not deal with code only responses
otocol/http/Handler.java, javax/net/ssl/HttpsURLConnection.java: Updated. * Makefile.am: Added new files and remove old ones. * Makefile.in: Regenerated. Patches: http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libjava/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.3283&r2=1.3284 http://g
[Bug libgcj/15157] Lack of chuncked encoding handling causes junk in http downloads
otocol/http/Handler.java, javax/net/ssl/HttpsURLConnection.java: Updated. * Makefile.am: Added new files and remove old ones. * Makefile.in: Regenerated. Patches: http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libjava/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.3283&r2=1.3284 http://g
[Bug tree-optimization/36809] Optimization Sequence
--- Comment #2 from abidmuslim at gmail dot com 2008-07-11 14:51 --- (In reply to comment #1) > Please read about the proper way to submit PRs: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html > > and provide the required information. Thanks in advance! > In continuation of the
[wwwdocs] lists: Add documentation about the Sourceware public-inbox
x.gcc.listname. +More information about IMPA access is also available on the respective +lists mirror page. + + Announcement lists: - https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-announce/";>gcc-announce + https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-announce/";>gcc-announce + https://inbox.source
Re: [wwwdocs] lists: Add documentation about the Sourceware public-inbox
age of each list for more > +information. > + > + IMAP > + Similarly, archives are also exposed over IMAP via > + > imap://;AUTH=anonym...@inbox.sourceware.org/inbox.gcc.listname. > +More information about IMPA access is also available on the respective > +
[patch] Fix links in libstdc++ doxygen comments
+ http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"; xlink:href="http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.7.4/libstdc++/api/";>for the 4.7.4 release + + + + + + http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"; xlink:href="http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedo
[wwwdocs] Redirect svn.html to git.html.
100644 --- a/htdocs/.htaccess +++ b/htdocs/.htaccess @@ -67,6 +67,7 @@ Redirect permanent /projects.html https://gcc.gnu.org/projects/ Redirect permanent /projects/cxx1z.html https://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx-status.html#cxx1z Redirect permanent /projects/web.html
X86 GCC automated testers are back online
X86 GCC automated testers are back online. They bootstrap and run testsuite for master branch and the current 2 release branches on Linux/x86-64 and Linux/i686: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-testresults/2020-March/555912.html https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-testresults/2020-March/555909
Re: [AArch64] Patches for review
Hi, Here is the list of my AArch64 patches for review: * https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-01/msg01216.html (Fix symbol offset limit) * https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-08/msg00396.html (PR60580: Fix frame pointer option magic) * https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-07
Re: [Patch, Fortran] PR 82018: -Wextra should imply -Wconversion-extra
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 10:26:52PM +0200, Dominique d'Humières wrote: > > I am really upset by the time spent on warning at the expense > of more serious problems. > https://tinyurl.com/y6wunnk9 https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2017-09/msg00065.html or this is a consequence ht
Implicit-it upstream discussion.
Hi Michael, Here's the gcc-patches@ discussion you asked for: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-07/msg01339.html http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-07/msg01351.html http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-07/msg01353.html http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-07/msg01354.html
[bts-link] source package gcc-4.0
# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-4.0 # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user [EMAIL PROTECTED] # remote status report for #107123 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR3507 # * remote status changed: (?) -> ASSIGNED usertags 107123 + sta
Patch ping
Hi! I'd like to ping a few pending patches: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-November/607534.html - PR107846 - P1 - c-family: Account for integral promotions of left shifts for -Wshift-overflow warning https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-January/610285
backporting fixes for xtensa to stable branches
gcc-5-branch: r226963 ("xtensa: use unwind-dw2-fde-dip instead of unwind-dw2-fde"): https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc?view=revision&revision=226963 r226964 ("xtensa: fix _Unwind_GetCFA"): https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc?view=revision&revision=226964 r227809 ("xtens
RE: Remove spam in GCC mailing list
ntically trying to get the spams removed, to keep their clients from suing them. I think gcc is best served by just leaving the spams in the archive, as permanent punishment for the people who paid to wreck the Internet for their own gain. -Original Message- From: gcc-ow...@gcc.gnu.org
[bts-link] source package gcc-4.2
# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-4.2 # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user [EMAIL PROTECTED] # remote status report for #443028 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR31947 # * remote status changed: (?) -> NEW usertags 443028 + status-
[wwwdocs] gcc-12: jit changes
36258 100644 --- a/htdocs/gcc-12/changes.html +++ b/htdocs/gcc-12/changes.html @@ -380,7 +380,40 @@ a work-in-progress. - +libgccjit + + + The libgccjit API gained 23 new entry points: + + 17 new "reflection" entrypoints for querying functions and types (https://gcc.gnu.org
[bts-link] source package gcc-4.3
# # bts-link upstream status pull for source package gcc-4.3 # see http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2006/05/msg1.html # user [EMAIL PROTECTED] # remote status report for #36600 # * http://gcc.gnu.org/PR14990 # * remote status changed: (?) -> SUSPENDED usertags 36600 + sta
[Bug c++/33640] New: [4.2.2 regression] testsuite failure in g++.dg/other/unused1.C
I'm seeing a regression in gcc-4.2.2 prerelease: FAIL: g++.dg/other/unused1.C scan-assembler (string|ascii?)z?\\t"class2("|000) The failure happens on multiple (all?) configurations starting around Sept 13th: CLEAN results: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2007-0
Re: GCC 4.5 Status Report (2009-07-29)
Hi, The compile farm builders show two broken bootstraps: * sparc-linux (gcc54) C bootstrap is broken http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40788 I just added a 1 day revision range to this PR, sparc-solaris is broken too. ../../trunk/gcc/genattrtab.c: In function 'attr_
[wwwdocs] Buildstat update for 8.x
10:44:39.0 +0200 +++ /tmp/tmp.TT8mJUrfRi 2018-05-23 18:38:20.175098068 +0200 @@ -20,5 +20,67 @@ http://gcc.gnu.org/install/finalinstall.html";> Installing GCC: Final Installation. + + + +i386-pc-solaris2.10 + +Test results: +https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2018-05/msg00
[wwwdocs] Buildstat update for 4.6
/gcc-4.6/buildstat.html,v retrieving revision 1.8 diff -u -r1.8 buildstat.html --- buildstat.html 18 Nov 2011 11:46:41 - 1.8 +++ buildstat.html 5 Dec 2011 16:05:46 - @@ -132,6 +132,7 @@ i386-pc-solaris2.10 Test results: +http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2011-11
[Bug libstdc++/17937] Critical ~__pool troubles
e_local-4.cc: Fix. * testsuite/ext/mt_allocator/deallocate_local_thread-3.cc: Fix. * testsuite/ext/mt_allocator/deallocate_local_thread-1.cc: Fix. Patches: http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.2699&r2=1.2700 http://gcc.gnu.or
AW: AW: AW: AW: AW: Problem using gcov
Ok, thank you. Alexander -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: gcc-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [mailto:gcc-ow...@gcc.gnu.org] Im Auftrag von Martin Liška Gesendet: Dienstag, 27. Februar 2018 13:39 An: Alexander Fichtinger ; gcc@gcc.gnu.org Betreff: Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: Problem using gcov On 02/27/2018
Re: [Patch,testsuite,AVR]: target-supports.exp: AVR does not support TLS
b3a30bf2 Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x0864e398 in set_is_used (var=0xb7dd3600) at ../../../gcc.gnu.org/trunk/gcc/tree-flow-inline.h:562 (gdb) bt #0 0x0864e398 in set_is_used (var=0xb7dd3600) at ../../../gcc.gnu.org/trunk/gcc/tree-flow-inline.h:562 #1 0x0864e256 in
[Bug web/53632] New: [bugzilla] Bugzilla being very slow to submit changes, sending duplicate emails
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53632 Bug #: 53632 Summary: [bugzilla] Bugzilla being very slow to submit changes, sending duplicate emails Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown
Re: ARC's pending patches
file still lists arc portJoern Rennecke and I am copying Jörn on this. In my experience, the best way to get additional maintainers or have a replacement is for the (or a) current maintainer to nominate her. > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-06/msg0110
Re: x86 assembler syntax
On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 14:13 -0400, David Edelsohn wrote: > On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 11:56 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > > James Dennett writes: > > > >> Apart from using the name gcc@gcc.gnu.org for the help list, and > >> gcc-...@gcc.gnu.org for developer
[wwwdocs] Buildstat update for 4.6
buildstat.html --- buildstat.html 18 Mar 2012 14:47:29 - 1.10 +++ buildstat.html 3 Apr 2012 16:04:48 - @@ -108,6 +108,8 @@ i386-pc-solaris2.8 Test results: +http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2012-03/msg02401.html";>4.6.3, +http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults
[ACTIVITY] 20th - 24th June
Continued work on widening multiplies. Finally got a point where I have something I'm happy to post upstream! Posted here: http://www.mail-archive.com/gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org/msg08720.html Richard Guenther reviewed one of the patches, and found a flaw, so I've been working on addres
[Bug ada/13620] would be nice if gnatmake passed -fprofile-arcs to gnatlink
ABI. 2004-04-05 Olivier Hainque <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * 5gmastop.adb (Pop_Frame): Comment out the pragma Linker_Option for libexc. We currently don't reference anything in this library and linking it in triggers linker warnings we don't w
[Bug web/52398] New: Broken link at http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Libstdc++
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52398 Bug #: 52398 Summary: Broken link at http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Libstdc++ Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal
[Bug libstdc++/21770] rebinding allocator::value type vs. container::value_type
n/3.cc: New. Patches: http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=1.3027&r2=1.3028 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/21_strings/basic_string/1.cc.diff?cvsroot=gcc&r1=NONE&r2=1.1 http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvswe
[wwwdocs] Document new C++ features in GCC 12
ers. The default is -Wbidi-chars=unpaired. - + bidirectional control characters. The default is + -Wbidi-chars=unpaired + (https://gcc.gnu.org/PR103026";>PR103026) + -Warray-compare warns about comparisons between two operands of + array type (https://g
Re: GCC 10.3 Released (successful bootstraps for Darwin versions)
versions --- I have successfully bootstrapped the following configurations for Darwin: i686-apple-darwin8 : NOTEs: 1/ this requires at least the toolchain from xcode 3.1.4 to succeed (GCC 7.5 tested) 2/ two small patches for Ada and libstdc++ https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-testresults/2021
[Bug sanitizer/55587] New: Testsuite test c-c++-common/asn/memcmp-1.c fails to link on targets without libasan/libsanitizer
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55587 Bug #: 55587 Summary: Testsuite test c-c++-common/asn/memcmp-1.c fails to link on targets without libasan/libsanitizer Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version
Re: GCC 4.0.1 RC2
> GCC 4.0.1 RC2 is now available here: > > ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/prerelease-4.0.1-20050616 OK on SPARC/Solaris: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-06/msg01107.html http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-06/msg01110.html http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-06
Re: GCC 4.0.2 RC1 Available
> GCC 4.0.2 RC1 is now available from FTP mirrors of gcc.gnu.org, in the: OK on SPARC/Solaris: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-09/msg00788.html http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-09/msg00789.html http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-09/msg00790.html http://gcc.gnu.org
Re: 404 @ https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-5/
On 27 December 2014 at 19:17, Jonathan Adamczewski wrote: > On Thu, Dec 25, 2014 at 4:52 PM, Jonathan Wakely > wrote: >> >> On 25 December 2014 at 16:28, Olaf van der Spek wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > https://gcc.gnu.org/ links to https://gcc.gnu.
