https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80880
Ilya Enkovich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79634
--- Comment #4 from Ilya Enkovich ---
We hit function pointer propagation issues before and chkp_redirect_edge with
corresponding code in redirect_call_stmt_to_callee appeared to handle them. Why
doesn't it work in this case?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79787
Ilya Enkovich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org
: middle-end
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Looking at PR79990 I found that we can ICE on register variable usage even when
no CHKP is used.
Here is a possible testcase:
typedef int v8 __attribute__
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78631
--- Comment #13 from Ilya Enkovich ---
(In reply to Alexander Ivchenko from comment #12)
> Fixed with r243942
It should be backported to GCC6.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70321
--- Comment #14 from Ilya Enkovich ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #13)
> So shall we still consider moving 32-bit stv pass before the combiner
> instead of after it? The argument about andn is no longer relevant, we have
> a one_cmp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78631
--- Comment #11 from Ilya Enkovich ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #10)
>
> MPX wrapper library isn't built with -z bndplt since it doesn't call
> external functions with bounds. But some internal functions, which
> need bounds, are calle
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78631
--- Comment #9 from Ilya Enkovich ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #8)
>
> MPX wrapper library doesn't call external functions with bounds
> and there is no need to use PLT to call internal functions within
> MPX wrapper library.
It doesn'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78631
--- Comment #7 from Ilya Enkovich ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #6)
> -z bndplt is needed to call external functions with bounds. But
> it isn't needed for internal function calls.
That doesn't explain why we need a hack you propose. Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78631
--- Comment #5 from Ilya Enkovich ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #3)
> The problem is that the internal MPX wrapper calls in libmpxwrappers.so:
Why doesn't call go through bndplt? Users might use similar code in their
libraries and expect
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78631
Ilya Enkovich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77267
--- Comment #6 from Ilya Enkovich ---
(In reply to Matthias Klose from comment #5)
> I think it's wrong to have HAVE_LD_PUSHPOPSTATE_SUPPORT baked into the
> driver while it can be easily changed with -fuse-ld=bfd. It would be very
> nice to hav
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77267
Ilya Enkovich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71734
--- Comment #10 from Ilya Enkovich ---
Author: ienkovich
Date: Thu Jul 28 14:19:18 2016
New Revision: 238817
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238817&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
2016-07-28 Yuri Rumyantsev
PR tree-optimization/717
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72657
Ilya Enkovich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72657
--- Comment #4 from Ilya Enkovich ---
Author: ienkovich
Date: Thu Jul 28 12:58:37 2016
New Revision: 238816
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238816&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR middle-end/72657
PR target/72683
* tr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72683
--- Comment #1 from Ilya Enkovich ---
Author: ienkovich
Date: Thu Jul 28 12:58:37 2016
New Revision: 238816
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238816&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR middle-end/72657
PR target/72683
* tr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72657
--- Comment #3 from Ilya Enkovich ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #2)
> Will it also fix PR 72683?
Yes.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72657
--- Comment #1 from Ilya Enkovich ---
Looks like it is caused by remained direct fndecl comparisons in checker code.
Usage of chkp_gimple_call_builtin_p everywhere should fix it.
Priority: P3
Component: ipa
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Here is a reproducer:
>cat small.i
int a;
int *b;
static void __attribute__((noinline))
fn2 (const char *c)
{
if
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71734
--- Comment #5 from Ilya Enkovich ---
Author: ienkovich
Date: Mon Jul 18 14:30:20 2016
New Revision: 238435
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238435&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
2016-07-18 Yuri Rumyantsev
PR tree-optimization/7173
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71624
Ilya Enkovich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71624
--- Comment #4 from Ilya Enkovich ---
Author: ienkovich
Date: Wed Jul 13 12:19:44 2016
New Revision: 238295
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238295&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
Backport from mainline r238086.
2016-07-07 Ilya
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71633
Ilya Enkovich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71633
--- Comment #2 from Ilya Enkovich ---
Author: ienkovich
Date: Wed Jul 13 11:02:15 2016
New Revision: 238290
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238290&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR ipa/71633
* ipa-inline-transform.c (inline_ca
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71518
--- Comment #4 from Ilya Enkovich ---
Author: ienkovich
Date: Mon Jul 11 15:21:20 2016
New Revision: 238212
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238212&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-07-11 Yuri Rumyantsev
Backport from mainline r238055.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71624
--- Comment #2 from Ilya Enkovich ---
Author: ienkovich
Date: Thu Jul 7 11:45:11 2016
New Revision: 238086
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238086&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR ipa/71624
* ipa-inline-analysis.c (compute_in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71518
--- Comment #3 from Ilya Enkovich ---
Author: ienkovich
Date: Wed Jul 6 14:37:26 2016
New Revision: 238055
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238055&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
2016-07-06 Yuri Rumyantsev
PR tree-optimization/7151
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71488
Bug 71488 depends on bug 71655, which changed state.
Bug 71655 Summary: [7 Regression] GCC trunk ICE on westmere target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71655
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71655
--- Comment #2 from Ilya Enkovich ---
Author: ienkovich
Date: Wed Jun 29 12:26:40 2016
New Revision: 237846
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237846&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR tree-optimization/71655
* tree-vect-stmts.c (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71655
Ilya Enkovich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70729
--- Comment #27 from Ilya Enkovich ---
Author: ienkovich
Date: Wed Jun 29 10:16:43 2016
New Revision: 237844
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237844&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
2016-06-29 Yuri Rumyantsev
PR tree-optimization/707
||2016-06-27
CC||ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ienkovich at gcc dot
gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Ilya Enkovich ---
Confirm. Caused
Priority: P3
Component: ipa
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
There is a regression introduced by r236274.
>cat small.i
class c1
{
virtual void fn1 ();
};
class c2
{
virtual int *fn2 () co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71488
--- Comment #11 from Ilya Enkovich ---
Author: ienkovich
Date: Wed Jun 22 14:05:55 2016
New Revision: 237706
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237706&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR middle-end/71488
* tree-vect-patterns.c (vec
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ipa
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Here is a small test causing ICE:
>cat small.cc
class c1
{
public:
virtual int fn1 () const;
int fn2 (co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71529
Ilya Enkovich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71529
--- Comment #3 from Ilya Enkovich ---
Author: ienkovich
Date: Mon Jun 20 11:35:02 2016
New Revision: 237592
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237592&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
Backport from mainline r237484.
2016-06-15 Ilya
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71559
Ilya Enkovich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71529
--- Comment #2 from Ilya Enkovich ---
Author: ienkovich
Date: Wed Jun 15 15:49:40 2016
New Revision: 237484
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237484&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR middle-end/71529
* ipa-chkp.c (chkp_build_ins
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71488
--- Comment #9 from Ilya Enkovich ---
Created attachment 38704
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38704&action=edit
Enable masks comparison with no new patterns
Here is a version without additional patterns (mask conversion pat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71488
--- Comment #8 from Ilya Enkovich ---
Created attachment 38703
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38703&action=edit
Enable masks comparison using patterns
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #7)
>
> Sounds reasonable th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71488
--- Comment #6 from Ilya Enkovich ---
I think we should disable vectorization of boolean comparison (except '==' and
'!=') and handle them applying patterns. E.g. a > b ==> a & !b, a >= b ==> a |
!b etc. Bitwise operations are better because wo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71488
--- Comment #5 from Ilya Enkovich ---
What seems suspicious to me is how we vectorize boolean comparison. Before
vectorization we have (_3, _5, _6 are bool):
_3 = var_9.0_2 == 0;
_6 = _3 > _5;
vectorized code:
mask__3.59_62 = vect_cst__
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71529
--- Comment #1 from Ilya Enkovich ---
Arguments copied for instrumented functions with no body don't have their
context fixed. It didn't trigger any problems before but does now because we
may inline into thunks. I'm testing this patch now:
di
: middle-end
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
This fail starts with r236299. Looks like it happens because 'this' parameter
of instrumented constructor has wrong DECL_CONTEXT (not instrumented version o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71279
Ilya Enkovich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71279
--- Comment #5 from Ilya Enkovich ---
Author: ienkovich
Date: Fri May 27 10:43:34 2016
New Revision: 236811
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236811&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
Backport from mainline r236810.
2016-05-27 Ilya
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71279
--- Comment #4 from Ilya Enkovich ---
Author: ienkovich
Date: Fri May 27 10:39:40 2016
New Revision: 236810
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236810&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR middle-end/71279
* fold-const.c (fold_ternary
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71279
--- Comment #3 from Ilya Enkovich ---
This looks similar to PR70251 but this time transformation is performed in
folding. Here is a description of applied transformation:
/* Convert A ? 0 : 1 to !A. This prefers the use of NOT_EXPR
ove
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71070
Ilya Enkovich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71070
Ilya Enkovich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71148
--- Comment #10 from Ilya Enkovich ---
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #9)
> > I did add PR reference but it didn't work for some reason.
>
> No, you didn't in the commit message, which is where it is needed:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71206
Ilya Enkovich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71148
--- Comment #8 from Ilya Enkovich ---
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #7)
> Thanks. Please add a reference to the PR in the ChangeLog next time, this
> will automatically add a cross-reference in the audit trail.
I did add PR reference
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71148
Ilya Enkovich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71148
--- Comment #4 from Ilya Enkovich ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> thus cleanup_cfg updating dominance info. Note the et_splay operation itself
> is this slow (another reason for this may be a corrupt et forest after the
> rece
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71161
--- Comment #7 from Ilya Enkovich ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #6)
> Well, the fact that libgo has a lot of execute fails doesn't point to
> libsanitizer. Maybe to split-stack support, who knows.
>
> What is special about r23
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71161
--- Comment #5 from Ilya Enkovich ---
So do all of r236090 related failures are reproducible with glibc 2.11.3 only?
IIUC the problem most probably hides in sanitizer runtime libraries and you
can't make preprocessed testcase reproducible with o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71114
Ilya Enkovich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71114
--- Comment #22 from Ilya Enkovich ---
Author: ienkovich
Date: Tue May 17 09:28:15 2016
New Revision: 236315
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236315&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR target/71114
* config/i386/i386.c (dimode_sc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71114
--- Comment #20 from Ilya Enkovich ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #18)
> > smoke test passes, I'll leave it to Dominique's full-run to confirm.
>
> With the patch in comment 15 applied on top of revision r236286 the reported
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71114
--- Comment #16 from Ilya Enkovich ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #15)
> that code won't build - did you mean :
>
Sure. Thanks for noticing!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71114
--- Comment #13 from Ilya Enkovich ---
Looks I found the problem. validize_mem generates new instructions which are
placed wrongly. This patch should help. Unfortunately I can't test it
properly on Darwin.
diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71114
--- Comment #9 from Ilya Enkovich ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #8)
> Created attachment 38495 [details]
> assembly for linux case
>
> Here's the asm for the case from my build, although I don't expect it'll
> help much if you can't
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71114
--- Comment #7 from Ilya Enkovich ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #2)
> Created attachment 38486 [details]
> Assembly for gcc.c-torture/execute/ashldi-1.c compiled with r236090
>
> Assembly for gcc.c-torture/execute/ashldi-1.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71114
--- Comment #6 from Ilya Enkovich ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #5)
> Also fails on Linux for the m32 multilib with -msse2avx :
> make -k check-gcc-c
> RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=unix/-msse/-msse2avx\{-m32,-m64\}
> execute.exp=ashl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71084
Ilya Enkovich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71006
Ilya Enkovich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71006
--- Comment #7 from Ilya Enkovich ---
Author: ienkovich
Date: Thu May 12 14:07:13 2016
New Revision: 236176
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236176&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
Backport from mainline r236171.
2016-05-12 Ilya
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71084
--- Comment #5 from Ilya Enkovich ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3)
> fwprop_init calcuates dominator info so it's likely df that runs cfg-cleanup
> and doesn't expect it to wreck dominator info.
>
> Probably rightfully so.
So sh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70935
Ilya Enkovich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71084
--- Comment #4 from Ilya Enkovich ---
This is still CSE invalidating dominance info. Calls to cleanup_cfg don't
affect cse_cfg_altered. If I replace cfg_cleanup calls with
cse_cfg_altered |= cleanup_cfg (..)
then testcase passes.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71006
--- Comment #5 from Ilya Enkovich ---
Author: ienkovich
Date: Thu May 12 11:27:49 2016
New Revision: 236171
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236171&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR tree-optimization/71006
* tree-vect-loop.c (v
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70876
--- Comment #5 from Ilya Enkovich ---
(In reply to Vittorio Zecca from comment #4)
> Will you please check gcc 6.1 with your fix against bug 70877?
>
> I get an ICE, could it be a regression?
GCC 6.1 is released and will not be fixed. PR70877
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71006
--- Comment #4 from Ilya Enkovich ---
(In reply to Chengnian Sun from comment #3)
> Hi,
>
> Can you help check whether the following test case is a duplicate? Thanks.
This is definitely a separate issue.
at gcc dot gnu.org |ienkovich at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Ilya Enkovich ---
Looking at it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70876
Ilya Enkovich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70877
Ilya Enkovich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70877
--- Comment #3 from Ilya Enkovich ---
Author: ienkovich
Date: Wed May 11 09:55:55 2016
New Revision: 236116
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236116&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
Backport from mainline r236088.
2016-05-10 Ilya
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70876
--- Comment #2 from Ilya Enkovich ---
Author: ienkovich
Date: Wed May 11 09:51:49 2016
New Revision: 236115
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236115&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
Backport from mainline r236086.
2016-05-10 Ilya
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70807
Ilya Enkovich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70807
--- Comment #4 from Ilya Enkovich ---
Author: ienkovich
Date: Wed May 11 09:33:13 2016
New Revision: 236114
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236114&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR middle-end/70807
* cfgrtl.h (delete_insn_and_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70876
--- Comment #1 from Ilya Enkovich ---
Fixed in trunk by r236086
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70799
--- Comment #3 from Ilya Enkovich ---
Author: ienkovich
Date: Tue May 10 16:08:42 2016
New Revision: 236090
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236090&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR target/70799
* config/i386/i386.c (dimode_sca
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70877
--- Comment #1 from Ilya Enkovich ---
Author: ienkovich
Date: Tue May 10 16:06:36 2016
New Revision: 236088
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236088&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR middle-end/70877
* tree-chkp.c (chkp_add_boun
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70786
--- Comment #8 from Ilya Enkovich ---
Author: ienkovich
Date: Tue May 10 15:56:27 2016
New Revision: 236086
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236086&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR tree-optimization/70786
* tree-chkp.c (chkp_f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70935
--- Comment #6 from Ilya Enkovich ---
Author: ienkovich
Date: Tue May 10 14:26:37 2016
New Revision: 236081
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236081&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
2016-05-10 Yuri Rumyantsev
Backport from mainline r2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70935
--- Comment #5 from Ilya Enkovich ---
Author: ienkovich
Date: Fri May 6 12:07:25 2016
New Revision: 235962
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=235962&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
2016-05-06 Yuri Rumyantsev
PR debug/70935
*
||2016-05-04
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ienkovich at gcc dot
gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
||2016-05-04
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ienkovich at gcc dot
gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70807
Ilya Enkovich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org
||ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #1 from Ilya Enkovich ---
Duplicate
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 69804 ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69804
Ilya Enkovich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zeccav at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70729
--- Comment #14 from Ilya Enkovich ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #13)
> (In reply to Yuri Rumyantsev from comment #12)
> > Created attachment 38367 [details]
> > modified patch
>
> The loop->aux flagging looks redundant to me. Wh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70729
Ilya Enkovich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69890
Ilya Enkovich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69890
--- Comment #10 from Ilya Enkovich ---
Author: ienkovich
Date: Fri Apr 1 15:31:43 2016
New Revision: 234677
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234677&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/testsuite/
Backport from mainline r234666.
2016-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69890
--- Comment #9 from Ilya Enkovich ---
Author: ienkovich
Date: Fri Apr 1 10:40:51 2016
New Revision: 234666
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234666&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/testsuite/
PR target/69890
* gcc.dg/strlenopt.h (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70442
Ilya Enkovich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
1 - 100 of 408 matches
Mail list logo
