https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118685
Gerald Pfeifer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-02-04
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115008
--- Comment #11 from Gerald Pfeifer ---
(In reply to Gerald Pfeifer from comment #8)
> Thank you, Nathaniel!
>
> Comparing a build from yesterday including my hack from comment #4
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-testresults/2024-December
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105010
--- Comment #27 from Gerald Pfeifer ---
Please ignore comment #26; wrong report.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105010
--- Comment #26 from Gerald Pfeifer ---
For the sake of completeness, there are a few differences in test
results - alas for two codebases 24 hours apart, so it's not just
your patch vs my hack that is different.
< FAIL: g++.dg/pch/line-map-2.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115008
--- Comment #8 from Gerald Pfeifer ---
Thank you, Nathaniel!
Comparing a build from yesterday including my hack from comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-testresults/2024-December/833400.html
with one from today with your proper patc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115008
--- Comment #6 from Gerald Pfeifer ---
(In reply to Gerald Pfeifer from comment #4)
> Let me change gcc/cp/module.cc as follows
>
> -#ifndef HAVE_POSIX_FALLOCATE
>#define posix_fallocate(fd,off,len) ftruncate (fd, off + len)
> -#endif
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115008
Gerald Pfeifer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112959
Gerald Pfeifer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112959
Gerald Pfeifer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||thierry at FreeBSD dot org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115008
Bug ID: 115008
Summary: ICE with modules on amd64-freebsd*
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Priority
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112959
--- Comment #5 from Gerald Pfeifer ---
Rainer, do you think the three changes I made - and hence the current
state of install.texi on trunk - address all the issues you reported
and sufficiently well?
(I hope Andrew is going to commit the chang
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112959
Gerald Pfeifer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |gerald at pfeifer dot
com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112958
--- Comment #6 from Gerald Pfeifer ---
FreeBSD i386 is on it's way out: FreeBSD 14 is the last series supporting
it; FreeBSD 15 is dropping support for it.
Can we disable libgnat (or GNAT) support during configure time?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97304
Gerald Pfeifer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gerald at pfeifer dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111632
--- Comment #22 from Gerald Pfeifer ---
(In reply to Dimitry Andric from comment #21)
> Indeed, please merge both commits:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;
> h=9970b576b7e4ae337af1268395ff221348c4b34a
> https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114369
Gerald Pfeifer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112343
Bug ID: 112343
Summary: [14 regression] ICE during GIMPLE pass: dse
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: debu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108350
Gerald Pfeifer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102675
--- Comment #20 from Gerald Pfeifer ---
Thank you, Jakub!
I finished testing/preparing the second part of the patch, just did not get
to push.
So I went ahead and gave your suggested patch a try - and it passes bootstrap,
so good to go I'd say
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102675
--- Comment #18 from Gerald Pfeifer ---
Thank you, Jakub!
I finished testing/preparing the second part of the patch, just did not get
to push. I'll give your suggested patch a try tonight!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102675
Gerald Pfeifer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #14 from Gerald Pfeife
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102675
--- Comment #12 from Gerald Pfeifer ---
Created attachment 51658
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51658&action=edit
$WRKDIR/i586-unknown-freebsd11.4/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/Makefile
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102675
--- Comment #11 from Gerald Pfeifer ---
Created attachment 51657
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51657&action=edit
$WRKDIR/i586-unknown-freebsd11.4/libsanitizer/Makefile
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102675
--- Comment #9 from Gerald Pfeifer ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #8)
> Does sanitizer_common/sanitizer_platform_limits_freebsd.cpp need any header
> files from GCC?
>From what I found, that does not appear to be the case.
> If yes, why
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102675
--- Comment #2 from Gerald Pfeifer ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #1)
> That file is FreeBSD specific. Can you use a local patch to force
> /usr/include/md5.h, like
>
> #include_next
I tried replacing #include by #include_next ; that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102675
Bug ID: 102675
Summary: [12 regression] Bootstrap fails in libsanitizer:
'MD5_DIGEST_STRING_LENGTH' was not declared in this
scope
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101491
--- Comment #7 from Gerald Pfeifer ---
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #2)
> I'm using $(includedir). What should I be using? Thanks
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5)
> I think a more appropriate place would be where we als
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81315
Gerald Pfeifer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102242
Gerald Pfeifer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |gerald at pfeifer dot
com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102242
--- Comment #3 from Gerald Pfeifer ---
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #1)
> Sorry about the breakage.
That's what my nightly testers are here for to catch. :)
> I think I need to #define INCLUDE_UNIQUE_PTR before including system.h,
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102242
Bug ID: 102242
Summary: [11 regression] analyzer/engine.cc built with clang:
/usr/include/c++/v1/typeinfo:346:5: error: no member
named 'fancy_abort'
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100662
Gerald Pfeifer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andreast at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101491
Gerald Pfeifer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-07-18
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101491
Bug ID: 101491
Summary: [11 regression] /usr/local/include/libgccjit++.h
conflicts between different GCC installations
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100560
Bug ID: 100560
Summary: [13 regression] build/gengtype-state.o fails with
clang 10.0.1: cannot specify -o when generating
multiple output files
Product: gcc
Vers
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99422
--- Comment #15 from Gerald Pfeifer ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99438 still happens,
i.e. i586-unknown-freebsd11.2.
Is anyone able to successfully build any 32-bit x86 target?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99438
Bug ID: 99438
Summary: [11 regression] libgcc/soft-fp/divtf3.c:51:1: error:
unrecognizable insn
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98181
Gerald Pfeifer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at kernel dot
crashing.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32927
Gerald Pfeifer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
39 matches
Mail list logo
