Re: [Patch, fortran V3] PR fortran/100683 - Array initialization refuses valid (list of pending patches)

Hi José, > Thus: Do you have a list of patches pending review? https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-April/055924.html PRs 100029 and 100040. I have the patch in my working tree for a long time. It works as expected. OK to commit. https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-April/0559

Re: [Patch, fortran V3] PR fortran/100683 - Array initialization refuses valid

Hi José, The logic is now much clearer. OK for the new version. Thanks for the work. Dominique

Re: [Patch, fortran v2] PR fortran/93308/93963/94327/94331/97046 problems raised by descriptor handling

Le 2021-06-06 19:58, dhumieres.domini...@free.fr a écrit : Hi José, Patch tested only on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. Also tested on darwin20. The patch is OK for me provided the updated PR94331.c test file replaces the original one. Since the PRs are about wrong code, I think the patch should be bac

Re:[Patch, fortran] PR fortran/93308/93963/94327/94331/97046 problems raised by descriptor handling

Hi José, Patch tested only on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. Also tested on darwin20. The patch is OK for me provided the updated PR94331.c test file replaces the original one. Since the PRs are about wrong code, I think the patch should be backported to at least GCC11 (applied and regtested OK). Th

Re: [Patch, fortran] PR fortran/100120/100816/100818/100819/100821 problems raised by aggregate data types

Since the PRs are about wrong code, I think the patch should be back ported to at least GCC11. Dominique Le 2021-06-04 17:24, Paul Richard Thomas a écrit : Hi José, I can second Dominique's thanks. I applied it to my tree when you first posted, set the regtest in motion and have not been able

Re: [Patch, fortran] PR fortran/100120/100816/100818/100819/100821 problems raised by aggregate data types

Hi José, Patch tested only on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. Also tested on darwin20. The patch is OK for me. Thanks for the work, Dominique