is [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: dimanche 9 juin 2002 01:33
To: Gerd Koslowski; 'Risto Jouhki'; VERBEEK, Francois
Cc: debian-security@lists.debian.org; 'suardi aurelien'
Subject:Re: ROUTEUR ET IDENTD
I have been reading this
1ere remarque : ça ne se fait pas d'envoyer une question pareille sur autant de
mailing-lists à la fois.
2eme remarque : sur les listes internationales, on parle anglais, sous peine de
ne pas se faire comprendre (et de ne pas recevoir de réponse)
3eme remarque : l'orthographe ne doit pas être par
Hello
Does anyone know when Bind 9.2.1 will be integrated in the testing branch?
There is a CERT advisory about a vulnerability in bind 9.2.0.
CERT Advisory CA-2002-15 Denial-of-Service Vulnerability in ISC BIND 9
http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/739123.
Bind version 9.2.1 is integrated in the
Simple and easy does the trick when working with such scripts.
it's the result of an iptables-save
# Generated by iptables-save v1.2.5 on Mon Apr 8 18:10:23 2002
*filter
#
#DEFAULT POLICIES
#
:INPUT DROP
:FORWARD DROP
:OUTPUT DROP
#
# INPUT and OUTPUT chains are only used when packets are go
Simple and easy does the trick when working with such scripts.
it's the result of an iptables-save
# Generated by iptables-save v1.2.5 on Mon Apr 8 18:10:23 2002
*filter
#
#DEFAULT POLICIES
#
:INPUT DROP
:FORWARD DROP
:OUTPUT DROP
#
# INPUT and OUTPUT chains are only used when packets are g
BTW if you plan to use --dport you need rather a line like
iptables -A INPUT -p tcp -s 0/0 -m tcp --dport 22 -i $dev -j ACCEPT
François
-Original Message-
From: Michal Melewski [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: vendredi 12 avril 2002 11:37
To: debian-
BTW if you plan to use --dport you need rather a line like
iptables -A INPUT -p tcp -s 0/0 -m tcp --dport 22 -i $dev -j ACCEPT
François
-Original Message-
From: Michal Melewski [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: vendredi 12 avril 2002 11:37
To: [EMAI
Note that PPPoE is anyway encapsulated in ATM so you eventually get an
additional (and useless) overhead.
Some say you never feel it, others say you do.
Anyway, to avoid unnecessary encapsulation is always an advantage.
The hack of Alcatel SpeedTouch home to SpeedTouch Pro is worth it, seeing as
Note that PPPoE is anyway encapsulated in ATM so you eventually get an
additional (and useless) overhead.
Some say you never feel it, others say you do.
Anyway, to avoid unnecessary encapsulation is always an advantage.
The hack of Alcatel SpeedTouch home to SpeedTouch Pro is worth it, seeing as
Note that PPPoE is anyway encapsulated in ATM so you eventually get an additional (and
useless) overhead.
Some say you never feel it, others say you do.
Anyway, to avoid unnecessary encapsulation is always an advantage.
The hack of Alcatel SpeedTouch home to SpeedTouch Pro is worth it, seeing a
Well what you propose here is not exactly IPSec. It's an encrypted way to
communicate but not IPSec. Don't expect it to work with a Cisco router/VPN
concentrator or a Win2K machine.
FreeSwan is quite a good product, quite inter-operable with all paltforms I
tested it with. (It's been a while now
Well what you propose here is not exactly IPSec. It's an encrypted way to communicate
but not IPSec. Don't expect it to work with a Cisco router/VPN concentrator or a Win2K
machine.
FreeSwan is quite a good product, quite inter-operable with all paltforms I tested it
with. (It's been a while no
I rather think of a problem with a PS/2 and VGA switch-box failing or
rebooting. Do you run GPM on your machine? Maybe it can have prblems when the
PS/2 mouse is disconnected or when the switch reboots.
I've seen that before (rather with Win9X, I daresay)
-Original Message-
I rather think of a problem with a PS/2 and VGA switch-box failing or rebooting. Do
you run GPM on your machine? Maybe it can have prblems when the PS/2 mouse is
disconnected or when the switch reboots.
I've seen that before (rather with Win9X, I daresay)
-Original Message-
14 matches
Mail list logo
