Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] LLVM 14.0.0 Release Schedule

On 1/20/22 00:28, Michał Górny wrote: On Wed, 2022-01-19 at 21:23 -0800, Tom Stellard via Release-testers wrote: Hi, I've posted the proposed 14.0.0 Release Schedule here: https://llvm.discourse.group/t/llvm-14-0-0-release-schedule/5846 Any reason this isn't in the 'release testers' categor

[lldb-dev] LLVM 14.0.0 Release Schedule

Hi, I've posted the proposed 14.0.0 Release Schedule here: https://llvm.discourse.group/t/llvm-14-0-0-release-schedule/5846 -Tom ___ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev

Re: [lldb-dev] RFC: New Automated Release Workflow (using Issues and Pull Requests)

On 12/17/21 13:15, Tom Stellard wrote: Hi, Here is a proposal for a new automated workflow for managing parts of the release process.  I've been experimenting with this over the past few releases and now that we have migrated to GitHub issues, it would be possible for us to implement this in th

Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] Release 13.0.1-rc1 has been tagged

On 1/1/22 12:54, Sean McBride wrote: On 30 Nov 2021, at 1:07, Tom Stellard via cfe-dev wrote: Testers can begin testing and uploading binaries. It's been over a month since 13.0.1-rc1, and, as has been the case for many previous releases, there are no macOS binaries. And chance we'll see so

[lldb-dev] Subscribing to GitHub issue labels

Hi, We have a system now for subscribing to GitHub issue labels. If you want to subscribe to a label, request membership in the issue-subscribers-$LABEL_NAME team from https://github.com/orgs/llvm/teams. If the team does not exist yet, file an issue and assign it to me and I will create the tea

Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] RFC: New Automated Release Workflow (using Issues and Pull Requests)

On 12/23/21 09:53, Renato Golin wrote: On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 at 21:15, Tom Stellard via llvm-dev mailto:llvm-...@lists.llvm.org>> wrote: * On an existing issue or a newly created issue, a user who wants to backport one or more commits to the release branch adds a comment: /cherry-pic

Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] RFC: New Automated Release Workflow (using Issues and Pull Requests)

On 12/20/21 18:21, Mehdi AMINI wrote: On Mon, Dec 20, 2021 at 3:24 PM Tom Stellard mailto:tstel...@redhat.com>> wrote: On 12/20/21 09:16, Tom Stellard wrote: > On 12/18/21 15:04, David Blaikie wrote: >> >> >> On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 6:38 PM Tom Stellard mailto:tstel...@

Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] RFC: New Automated Release Workflow (using Issues and Pull Requests)

On 12/20/21 09:16, Tom Stellard wrote: On 12/18/21 15:04, David Blaikie wrote: On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 6:38 PM Tom Stellard mailto:tstel...@redhat.com>> wrote:     On 12/17/21 16:47, David Blaikie wrote: > Sounds pretty good to me - wouldn't mind knowing more about/a good summary of the

Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] RFC: New Automated Release Workflow (using Issues and Pull Requests)

On 12/18/21 15:04, David Blaikie wrote: On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 6:38 PM Tom Stellard mailto:tstel...@redhat.com>> wrote: On 12/17/21 16:47, David Blaikie wrote: > Sounds pretty good to me - wouldn't mind knowing more about/a good summary of the effects of this on project/repo/etc not

Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] RFC: New Automated Release Workflow (using Issues and Pull Requests)

On 12/17/21 16:47, David Blaikie wrote: Sounds pretty good to me - wouldn't mind knowing more about/a good summary of the effects of this on project/repo/etc notifications that Mehdi's mentioning. (be good to have a write up of the expected impact/options to then discuss - from the thread so f

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] RFC: New Automated Release Workflow (using Issues and Pull Requests)

On 12/17/21 13:25, Mehdi AMINI wrote: Hi, On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 1:15 PM Tom Stellard via Release-testers mailto:release-test...@lists.llvm.org>> wrote: Hi, Here is a proposal for a new automated workflow for managing parts of the release process.  I've been experimenting wit

[lldb-dev] RFC: New Automated Release Workflow (using Issues and Pull Requests)

Hi, Here is a proposal for a new automated workflow for managing parts of the release process. I've been experimenting with this over the past few releases and now that we have migrated to GitHub issues, it would be possible for us to implement this in the main repo. The workflow is pretty str

[lldb-dev] 13.0.1 Release Update

Hi, I'm back on track with the release after the buzilla migration, so I'm going to accept backport requests until Monday, Dec 20, and then I'll try to tag -rc2 on Wed Dec 21. If you have patches you want backported to the release/13.x branch, please file an issue and add it to the "LLVM 13.0.1

Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] Release 13.0.1-rc1 has been tagged

Re-sending and dropping the Fedora list, which I accidentally cc'd. On 12/2/21 08:35, Tom Stellard wrote: On 12/2/21 06:45, Nemanja Ivanovic wrote: Hi Tom, would it be OK to directly send you git hashes for patches we would like back ported until the bugzilla transition completes? Yes, tha

Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] Release 13.0.1-rc1 has been tagged

On 12/2/21 06:45, Nemanja Ivanovic wrote: Hi Tom, would it be OK to directly send you git hashes for patches we would like back ported until the bugzilla transition completes? Yes, that's fine. -Tom On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 1:08 AM Tom Stellard via cfe-dev mailto:cfe-...@lists.llvm.org>> w

Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] Release 13.0.1-rc1 has been tagged

On 11/30/21 12:35, Brooks Davis wrote: On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 10:07:52PM -0800, Tom Stellard via cfe-dev wrote: Hi, I've tagged 13.0.1-rc1. Testers can begin testing and uploading binaries. There don't seem be llvm-project tarballs. I see: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/releases/dow

Re: [lldb-dev] Release 13.0.1-rc1 has been tagged

+ Release-testers On 11/29/21 22:07, Tom Stellard wrote: Hi, I've tagged 13.0.1-rc1.  Testers can begin testing and uploading binaries. There is still time to submit fixes for the final 13.0.1.  I'll give more details about timelines and how to do this once the bugzilla migration is complete. 

[lldb-dev] Release 13.0.1-rc1 has been tagged

Hi, I've tagged 13.0.1-rc1. Testers can begin testing and uploading binaries. There is still time to submit fixes for the final 13.0.1. I'll give more details about timelines and how to do this once the bugzilla migration is complete. Currently, bugzilla is read-only, so we can't submit any f

Re: [lldb-dev] RFC: Code Review Process

On 10/5/21 9:05 AM, Tom Stellard wrote: Hi, # Proposal The LLVM Foundation Board of Directors is seeking comment on the current state of Code Review within the LLVM Project and its sub-projects.   Phabricator is no longer actively maintained and we would like to move away from a self-hosted s

Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] RFC: Code Review Process

On 10/5/21 10:48 AM, Mehdi AMINI wrote: On Tue, Oct 5, 2021 at 10:09 AM Tom Stellard via llvm-dev mailto:llvm-...@lists.llvm.org>> wrote: On 10/5/21 9:47 AM, Renato Golin wrote: > On Tue, 5 Oct 2021 at 17:06, Tom Stellard via llvm-dev mailto:llvm-...@lists.llvm.org>

Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] RFC: Code Review Process

On 10/5/21 9:47 AM, Renato Golin wrote: On Tue, 5 Oct 2021 at 17:06, Tom Stellard via llvm-dev mailto:llvm-...@lists.llvm.org>> wrote: - Any other information that you think will help the Board of Directors make the best decision. - Foundation Board will have 30 days to make a final d

[lldb-dev] RFC: Code Review Process

Hi, # Proposal The LLVM Foundation Board of Directors is seeking comment on the current state of Code Review within the LLVM Project and its sub-projects. Phabricator is no longer actively maintained and we would like to move away from a self-hosted solution, so our goal is to determine if

[lldb-dev] 13.0.0-rc4 has been tagged

Hi, I've tagged 13.0.0-rc4. Please test and upload binaries. If all goes well, we will release 13.0.0-final in ~1 week. -Tom ___ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev

Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] 13.0.0-rc3 has been tagged

On 9/17/21 10:29 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote: @Tom Stellard Shall I open a bug-report to cherry-pick...? commit 454f69bcc17e6451c926a2e7b708e900fc8fdcb8 "[PATCH] [LLD] Add required `ppc` target to the test cases. NFC") If yes - Can you point me to the LLVM release/13.x meta bug number? Yes,that w

[lldb-dev] Reminder: Put release-13.0.0 in the 'Blocks' field of bugs you want fixed in the 13.0.0 release

Hi, Please put release-13.0.0 in the Blocks field of bugs you want to fix in the 13.0.0 release. This is only way for me to track which bugs people want fixed. Thanks, Tom ___ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-b

[lldb-dev] 13.0.0-rc3 has been tagged

Hi, I've tagged 13.0.0-rc3. This will likely be the last rc unless there are critical bugs that are found. Please test the release and report results. -Tom ___ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/list

[lldb-dev] Release Update: 13.0.0-rc3 delayed. Fix deadline extended to Friday

Hi, There were a large volume of bugs that came in over the last few days, so I'm going to delay 13.0.0-rc3 until Monday so there is more time to fix them. This also means that you now have until Friday to submit fixes for the release/13.x branch. -Tom _

Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] [cfe-dev] 1 week until 13.0.0-rc2 release

On 9/7/21 12:41 PM, Sean McBride wrote: Pardon my ignorance, but what is "the server"? Could you share its URL so that we can download from there instead of github? The github page still does not have macOS binaries for neither the current release (12.0.1) nor the current rc (13.0.0-rc2). At

[lldb-dev] 13.0.0-rc2 has been tagged

Hi, I've tagged the 13.0.0-rc2 release. Testers can begin testing and uploading binaries. 13.0.0-rc3 is scheduled to be released on Sep. 7, so we'll continue to accept bug fixes in the branch until then. -Tom ___ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists

[lldb-dev] 13.0.1-rc2 release update

Hi, There have been some buildbot failures in the release/13.x branch, so I'm going to delay -rc2 until Thursday to investigate. -Tom ___ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev

[lldb-dev] 1 week until 13.0.0-rc2 release

Hi, There is only 1 week until the 13.0.0-rc2 release. If you have fixes you want to get into the release please file a bug and put release-13.0.0 in the 'blocks' field. The current plan is to accept fixes until 13.0.0-rc3, which is planned for 2 weeks after 13.0.0-rc2, but the earlier we get

[lldb-dev] 13.0.0-rc1 has been tagged

Hi, I've tagged the 13.0.0-rc1 release. Testers, please test and upload binaries. -Tom ___ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev

[lldb-dev] 13.0.0-rc1 pushed out to Monday

Hi, I'm going to give the release/13.x branch a few more days to stabilize, so I plan on tagging 13.0.0-rc1 on Monday now instead of Friday. -Tom ___ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-de

[lldb-dev] release/13.x branch has been created

Hi, I've created release/13.x branch. We will wait a few days to make sure the branch is stable and then 13.0.0-rc1 will be released on Friday. If you have patches you want to backport to the release/13.x branch you can email me or file a bug that blocks the release-13.0.0 metabug[1]. In addit

[lldb-dev] Reminder: release/13.x branch will be created on Tuesday

Hi, Just a reminder that the release/13.x branch will be created on Tuesday. -Tom ___ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev

Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] RFC: Update LLVM_VERSION_SUFFIX CMake variable for release candidates

On 7/1/21 2:06 PM, Harald van Dijk wrote: On 01/07/2021 20:45, Tom Stellard wrote: On 7/1/21 9:18 AM, Harald van Dijk wrote: On 29/06/2021 18:39, Tom Stellard via llvm-dev wrote: Hi, I would like to propose that we start using the LLVM_VERSION_SUFFIX CMake variable for release candidates.  Fo

[lldb-dev] 12.0.1-rc4 release has been tagged

Hi, I've tagged the 12.0.1-rc4 release. This will hopefully be the last release candidate. Please test and upload binaries. -Tom ___ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev

Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] RFC: Update LLVM_VERSION_SUFFIX CMake variable for release candidates

On 7/1/21 9:18 AM, Harald van Dijk wrote: On 29/06/2021 18:39, Tom Stellard via llvm-dev wrote: Hi, I would like to propose that we start using the LLVM_VERSION_SUFFIX CMake variable for release candidates.  For example: after the release/13.x branch is created, instead of changing LLVM_VERSION

Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] RFC: Update LLVM_VERSION_SUFFIX CMake variable for release candidates

On 7/1/21 8:26 AM, Ben Boeckel wrote: On Tue, Jun 29, 2021 at 10:39:01 -0700, Tom Stellard via cfe-dev wrote: I would like to propose that we start using the LLVM_VERSION_SUFFIX CMake variable for release candidates. For example: after the release/13.x branch is created, instead of changing LLV

[lldb-dev] RFC: Update LLVM_VERSION_SUFFIX CMake variable for release candidates

Hi, I would like to propose that we start using the LLVM_VERSION_SUFFIX CMake variable for release candidates. For example: after the release/13.x branch is created, instead of changing LLVM_VERSION_SUFFIX from "git" to "", we would change it to "rc1", then after the 13.0.0-rc1 release is tagged

[lldb-dev] 12.0.1-rc3 has been tagged

Hi, I've tagged the 12.0.1-rc3 release. Testers please test and upload binaries. -Tom ___ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev

[lldb-dev] Release 12.0.1-rc2 tagged + extended deadline for requesting backports

Hi, I've tagged the 12.0.1-rc2 release, so testers may begin testing and uploading binaries. There are still a few fixes working their way through the process, so there will be another release candidate. If you submitted a backport request before last Friday's deadline then it should make it in

[lldb-dev] Friday deadline for 12.0.1 fixes

Hi, If you have fixes you want to get into the 12.0.1 release, please file a bug at bugs.llvm.org an mark it as a blocker of the release-12.0.1 bug. I want to do the next -rc in ~1 week, so I would like to have all potential fixes submitted by Friday. Thanks, Tom _

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] 12.0.1-rc1 release has been tagged

On 6/2/21 2:40 AM, Michał Górny wrote: On Tue, 2021-06-01 at 10:03 -0700, Tom Stellard wrote: On 5/28/21 1:45 PM, Michał Górny wrote: On Wed, 2021-05-26 at 00:15 -0700, Tom Stellard via Release-testers wrote: Hi, I've tagged the 12.0.1-rc1 release. Testers may upload binaries and report res

[lldb-dev] Mailing List Status Update

Hi, We recently[1] ran into some issues with the mailing lists that caused us to disable automatic approval of subscriptions. Over the past few months, the LLVM Foundation Board of Directors have been investigating solutions to this issue and are recommending that the project move its discussion

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] 12.0.1-rc1 release has been tagged

On 5/28/21 1:45 PM, Michał Górny wrote: On Wed, 2021-05-26 at 00:15 -0700, Tom Stellard via Release-testers wrote: Hi, I've tagged the 12.0.1-rc1 release. Testers may upload binaries and report results. I've started testing, hit two bugs I've already reported for 12.0.0 RCs and figured out

Re: [lldb-dev] lldb-sphinx-docs builder is failing

is building the lldb documentation. Would you be able to retire the bot? -Tom Cheers, - Raphael On 11 May 2021, at 07:37, Tom Stellard via lldb-dev wrote: Hi, The lldb-sphinx-docs builder has been failing for a while: https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/80 I think the problem i

[lldb-dev] 12.0.1-rc1 release has been tagged

Hi, I've tagged the 12.0.1-rc1 release. Testers may upload binaries and report results. -Tom ___ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev

[lldb-dev] lldb-sphinx-docs builder is failing

Hi, The lldb-sphinx-docs builder has been failing for a while: https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/80 I think the problem is that python is not installed on the worker, which causes the docs-lldb-html target to not be created. -Tom ___ lldb-de

[lldb-dev] Proposed Release Schedule for 12.0.1 and 13.0.0

Hi, Here is the proposed release schedule for the next 2 releases: 12.0.1 May 11: 12.0.1-rc1 June 8: 12.0.1-rc2 June 22: 12.0.1-final 13.0.0 July 27: release/13.x branch created July 30: 13.0.0-rc1 Aug 24: 13.0.0-rc2 Sep 7: 13.0.0-rc3 Sep 21: 13.0.0-final If there are no objections, I w

Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] [llvm-dev] Attn Buildbot Owners: Would you like your builder to test the release branch?

On 4/16/21 2:31 AM, Omair Javaid wrote: On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 at 20:41, Tom Stellard mailto:tstel...@redhat.com>> wrote: On 4/14/21 5:50 AM, Omair Javaid wrote: > Ping! > > Tom, any update on this? > Yes, thanks for reminding me.  The infrastructure is in place now, so

Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] [llvm-dev] Attn Buildbot Owners: Would you like your builder to test the release branch?

On 4/14/21 5:50 AM, Omair Javaid wrote: Ping! Tom, any update on this? Yes, thanks for reminding me. The infrastructure is in place now, so we can start adding more bots. Do you have a bot that you want to add? -Tom On Mon, 15 Feb 2021 at 20:02, Nemanja Ivanovic mailto:nemanja.i@gmai

[lldb-dev] LLVM 12.0.0-rc5 has been tagged

Hi, I've tagged 12.0.0-rc5, testers can begin testing and upload binaries. -Tom ___ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev

[lldb-dev] LLVM 12.0.0-rc3 has been tagged

Hi, I've tagged LLVM 12.0.0-rc3. Testers may begin testing and uploading binaries. If all goes well, this will be the last RC. -Tom ___ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev

[lldb-dev] Release 12.0.0 Update

Hi, We've found some issues in 12.0.0-rc2, so there will be another release candidate. This will delay 12.0.0-final by 1 to 2 weeks. -Tom ___ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev

Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] LLVM 11.1.0-final has been tagged.

On 2/18/21 1:18 AM, Hans Wennborg wrote: Windows is ready: $ sha256sum LLVM-11.0.1-win*.exe 76886461d2638ed16625a5e2dee35eae2202814fa9f9d99bd983f12d50f581ae LLVM-11.0.1-win32.exe d17bd0e556115c30ff45e30a3f9a623af89ad6a345a5df3ac47aa8b9eabab9a7 LLVM-11.0.1-win64.exe Hi Hans, I just noticed th

[lldb-dev] LLVM 12.0.0-rc2 has been tagged

Hi, LLVM 12.0.0-rc2 has been tagged. Please test and report any issues in bugzilla. -Tom ___ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev

Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] [llvm-dev] 12.0.0-rc1 Release has been tagged

On 2/19/21 7:07 AM, Yvan Roux wrote: Hi, I've built, tested and uploaded ARM and AArch64 binaries: 22bff83933ef52e605f89193165faaa6  clang+llvm-12.0.0-rc1-aarch64-linux-gnu.tar.xz feb0f3d832a6a8a1265db0533cd9fc77   clang+llvm-12.0.0-rc1-armv7a-linux-gnueabihf.tar.xz Which hash algorithm did

Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] 12.0.0-rc1 Release has been tagged

On 2/13/21 1:44 PM, Louis Dionne wrote: On Feb 13, 2021, at 12:04, Dimitry Andric wrote: On 28 Jan 2021, at 05:05, Tom Stellard via llvm-dev wrote: I've tagged the 12.0.0-rc1 release. Testers can begin testing and upload binaries. During 12.0.0-rc1 test builds on FreeBSD, I encounte

Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] 12.0.0-rc1 Release has been tagged

On 2/13/21 9:03 AM, Dimitry Andric wrote: On 28 Jan 2021, at 05:05, Tom Stellard via llvm-dev wrote: I've tagged the 12.0.0-rc1 release. Testers can begin testing and upload binaries. During 12.0.0-rc1 test builds on FreeBSD, I encountered this unittest failure, which turned out to be ca

[lldb-dev] LLVM 11.1.0-final has been tagged.

Hi, I've tagged 11.1.0-final, testers may begin uploading binaries now. -Tom ___ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev

[lldb-dev] 12.0.0 Release Update

Hi, There is just over a week left until 12.0.0-rc2 is tagged. After -rc2 is tagged, we will only be merging critical fixes into the branch. Any other fixes will need to wait until the 12.0.1 release. Here is a list of outstanding bugs that we are tracking for the release: Bug |

Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] [cfe-dev] Attn Buildbot Owners: Would you like your builder to test the release branch?

On 2/12/21 1:49 AM, Omair Javaid wrote: Hi Tom, We at Linaro are maintaining LLVM Arm/AArch64 buildbots and want a host buildbot for testing of release branches. OK, that's great. Kindly share the steps to do this. Do we have to host separate builbots for tracking release branches or is i

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] LLVM 11.1.0-rc3 has been tagged

On 2/10/21 2:38 AM, Michał Górny wrote: On Mon, 2021-02-08 at 09:14 -0800, Tom Stellard via Release-testers wrote: Hi, I've tagged LLVM 11.1.0-rc3. If there are no issues, then I'll be tagging the final release in 1 week. Testers please test and upload binaries. Do I understand correctly th

[lldb-dev] LLVM 11.1.0-rc3 has been tagged

Hi, I've tagged LLVM 11.1.0-rc3. If there are no issues, then I'll be tagging the final release in 1 week. Testers please test and upload binaries. -Tom ___ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinf

Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] Attn Buildbot Owners: Would you like your builder to test the release branch?

On 2/2/21 1:23 AM, Diana Picus wrote: Hi Tom, This sounds interesting! Would this also make it possible to automatically get the release binaries from the buildbots, as opposed to manually uploading to the FTP server? Yes, this is something I would like to do. I think you could pretty easi

[lldb-dev] Attn Buildbot Owners: Would you like your builder to test the release branch?

Hi, I would like to improve the testing coverage in the release branch, so if you are a buildbot owner and would like to enable your builder for the release branch, let me know, and I can help get it enabled. Also, if you have any ideas for some more extensive testing that might be too slow to

[lldb-dev] 12.0.0-rc1 Release has been tagged

Hi, I've tagged the 12.0.0-rc1 release. Testers can begin testing and upload binaries. -Tom ___ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev

[lldb-dev] Trunk is now 13.0.0

Hi, I've created the release/12.x branch and bumped the trunk version to 13.0.0. I'm planning to tag 12.0.0-rc1 on Wednesday, once I'm sure there are no major issues with the branch. -Tom ___ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org https://lists

[lldb-dev] Reminder: release/12.x branch will be created in 6 days

Hi, I will be creating the release/12.x branch next Tuesday and tagging 12.0.0-rc1 shortly after. -Tom ___ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] RFC: Upcoming release schedules and creating a formal schedule for future releases

On 1/4/21 8:32 PM, Tom Stellard via Release-testers wrote: Hi, I want to give an update on the status of the LLVM 11 and LLVM 12 releases.  11.0.1-final is expected to be tagged this week, along with 11.1.0-rc1.  Unfortunately, we had an ABI regression in libclang.so between LLVM 10 and LLVM

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] LLVM 11.1.0-rc1 has been tagged

On 1/18/21 2:54 PM, Tom Stellard wrote: On 1/13/21 5:46 PM, Tom Stellard via Release-testers wrote: Hi, LLVM 11.1.0-rc1 has been tagged.  This is a special release with a libclang.so ABI fix to ensure libclang.so remains compatible with LLVM 10 and LLVM 12.  Testers may begin testing and uplo

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] LLVM 11.1.0-rc1 has been tagged

On 1/13/21 5:46 PM, Tom Stellard via Release-testers wrote: Hi, LLVM 11.1.0-rc1 has been tagged.  This is a special release with a libclang.so ABI fix to ensure libclang.so remains compatible with LLVM 10 and LLVM 12.  Testers may begin testing and upload binaries. I was looking at the rel

[lldb-dev] LLVM 11.1.0-rc1 has been tagged

Hi, LLVM 11.1.0-rc1 has been tagged. This is a special release with a libclang.so ABI fix to ensure libclang.so remains compatible with LLVM 10 and LLVM 12. Testers may begin testing and upload binaries. Thanks, Tom ___ lldb-dev mailing list lldb

Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] RFC: Automated signing of release files

On 1/12/21 9:22 PM, Deep Majumder wrote: Hi Tom, Although I am new to the community, I think this a great idea. One question I have is how would the project key be securely stored. (Like where to store it and how to prevent leaks, I believe GitHub has a secrets feature. Would something similar

[lldb-dev] RFC: Automated signing of release files

Hi, I would like to automate the signing of some of the release files we upload to the release page, starting with the source tarballs. My initial goal is to have a CI job that automatically creates, signs, and uploads the source tarballs, whenever a new release is tagged. I would also like

Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] [Openmp-dev] RFC: Upcoming release schedules and creating a formal schedule for future releases

On 1/6/21 6:11 AM, Blower, Melanie I wrote: Tom, how did you detect the libclang ABI regression, is there automatic testing? Was there a discussion on the email lists, I missed it, would like to learn more. --Melanie It was reported by a user: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46526 We

[lldb-dev] LLVM 11.0.1-final has been tagged

Hi, I've tagged LLVM 11.0.1-final. Testers can upload the final binaries now. -Tom ___ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev

[lldb-dev] RFC: Upcoming release schedules and creating a formal schedule for future releases

Hi, I want to give an update on the status of the LLVM 11 and LLVM 12 releases. 11.0.1-final is expected to be tagged this week, along with 11.1.0-rc1. Unfortunately, we had an ABI regression in libclang.so between LLVM 10 and LLVM 11, so we need to do an 11.1.0 release to correct this. Th

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] LLVM 11.0.1-rc2 has been tagged

On 12/18/20 10:33 PM, Tom Stellard via Release-testers wrote: Hi, I've just tagged LLVM 11.0.1-rc2, hopefully this will be the last release candidate.  Testers can begin testing and uploading binaries. It doesn't look like there have been any major issues reported, so if nothing else comes

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] LLVM 11.0.1-rc2 has been tagged

On 12/21/20 11:51 AM, Michał Górny wrote: On Fri, 2020-12-18 at 22:33 -0800, Tom Stellard via Release-testers wrote: Hi, I've just tagged LLVM 11.0.1-rc2, hopefully this will be the last release candidate.  Testers can begin testing and uploading binaries. Gentoo amd64 looks good-ish, except

[lldb-dev] LLVM 11.0.1-rc2 has been tagged

Hi, I've just tagged LLVM 11.0.1-rc2, hopefully this will be the last release candidate. Testers can begin testing and uploading binaries. -Tom ___ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-d

[lldb-dev] How to disable GitHub Action notifications

Hi, We are currently working on a GitHub Action job to help with the transition to the 'main' branch. As a result, if you make a commit, you may receive a notification about a failed GitHub Action. If you want to disable these notifications, you can go to: https://github.com/settings/notifi

[lldb-dev] LLVM 11.0.1-rc1 has been tagged

Hi, I've tagged LLVM 11.0.1-rc1. Testers may begin testing and uploading binaries. If you still have bugs you want fixed in LLVM 11.0.1, you have until Dec. 8 to request backports. You can make these requests by filing a bug at bugs.llvm.org and putting release-11.0.1 in the 'blocks' field

[lldb-dev] LLVM 11.0.1 Release Schedule

Hi, Here is the LLVM 11.0.1 Release Schedule: Nov. 25: -rc1 Dec. 8-rc2/Deadline to request backports Dec. 15 -final I had proposed[1] changing the stable release schedules back in May, but due to a lack of improvement in the automated testing situation, I didn't feel comfortable impleme

[lldb-dev] Unable to build lldb on Mac OS

Hi, Is there anyone with access to a Mac OS system that has time to take a look at this bug: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46190 I had to disable the lldb post-commit test we have in the release/11.x branch because of this bug and would like to get it enabled again. Thanks, Tom ___

[lldb-dev] LLVM 10.0.1-final has been tagged

Hi, I've tagged 10.0.1-final. Testers, please begin uploading your binaries. Thanks, Tom ___ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] [llvm-dev] 10.0.1-rc4 tagged

On 7/15/20 1:07 PM, Tom Stellard via Release-testers wrote: On 7/14/20 8:35 PM, Brian Cain wrote: -Original Message- From: llvm-dev On Behalf Of Tom Stellard via llvm-dev ... On 7/9/20 7:42 PM, Brian Cain wrote: Uploaded: dcf43e25a77a2ffb4ffaa5a04babe409b2b3ffac07bc989a1dca730ecacb

Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] [Release-testers] 10.0.1-rc4 tagged

On 7/14/20 8:35 PM, Brian Cain wrote: -Original Message- From: llvm-dev On Behalf Of Tom Stellard via llvm-dev ... On 7/9/20 7:42 PM, Brian Cain wrote: Uploaded: dcf43e25a77a2ffb4ffaa5a04babe409b2b3ffac07bc989a1dca730ecacb43c2 clang+llvm-10.0.1-rc4-x86_64-linux-sles12.4.tar.xz 6db5

Re: [lldb-dev] [Release-testers] 10.0.1-rc4 tagged

On 7/9/20 7:42 PM, Brian Cain wrote: Uploaded: dcf43e25a77a2ffb4ffaa5a04babe409b2b3ffac07bc989a1dca730ecacb43c2  clang+llvm-10.0.1-rc4-x86_64-linux-sles12.4.tar.xz 6db54d9f55fb41877b23f4b89e7b68d44fcc5378d615d232c820307237dc33f7  clang+llvm-10.0.1-rc2-x86_64-linux-sles12.4.tar.xz 2d907945d8d8

[lldb-dev] 10.0.1-rc4 tagged

Hi, I've tagged 10.0.1-rc4, please test and report the results. -Tom ___ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev

[lldb-dev] LLVM 10.0.1-rc3 has been tagged

Hi, I've tagged LLVM 10.0.1-rc3. This will hopefully be the last release candidate, please test it out and report results on this thread. Thanks, Tom ___ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/

[lldb-dev] 10.0.1-rc2 release has been tagged

Hi, I've tagged the 10.0.1-rc2 release, please test the release and report any issues. Thanks, Tom ___ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev

[lldb-dev] LLVM 10.0.1 release update.

Hi, I'm still working through a number of backport requests for 10.0.1, so I'm going to postpone -rc2 until next week. -Tom ___ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lldb-dev

[lldb-dev] Last call for fixes for the 10.0.1 release

Hi, Thursday is the last day I'll be accepting fixes for the 10.0.1 release. If there is a fix you want to get in, please let me know before then. Thanks, Tom ___ lldb-dev mailing list lldb-dev@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/list

Re: [lldb-dev] [Openmp-dev] RFC: Release qualification criteria

On 05/25/2020 06:10 AM, Hans Wennborg wrote: > On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 8:59 PM Tom Stellard via Openmp-dev > wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I'm splitting this discussion off of my RFC for release process >> changes. >> >> We currently have no official release qualification criteria. In >> other words, we

Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] 10.0.1-rc1 release has been tagged

On 05/27/2020 01:04 PM, Machiel van Hooren wrote: > Hi, > > In this release as well as the 10.0.0 release, llvm fails to build on Windows > with the latest Visual Studio version (16.6.0) when building for debug. > See https://llvm.discourse.group/t/llvm-not-building-in-vusual-studio/1139/3 > Ca

Re: [lldb-dev] [Openmp-dev] RFC: Release process changes

On 05/25/2020 05:48 AM, Hans Wennborg wrote: > On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 8:59 PM Tom Stellard via Openmp-dev > wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I would like to propose a few changes to the LLVM release process. The >> current process is documented here: >> https://llvm.org/docs/HowToReleaseLLVM.html >> >>

Re: [lldb-dev] [llvm-dev] RFC: Release process changes

On 05/21/2020 05:54 PM, John McCall wrote: > On 21 May 2020, at 14:59, Tom Stellard via llvm-dev wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I would like to propose a few changes to the LLVM release process. The >> current process is documented here: >> https://llvm.org/docs/HowToReleaseLLVM.html >> >> There are two pa

Re: [lldb-dev] [cfe-dev] [Release-testers] RFC: Release process changes

On 05/21/2020 05:38 PM, Fāng-ruì Sòng wrote: > On 2020-05-21, Michał Górny via cfe-dev wrote: >> On Thu, 2020-05-21 at 11:59 -0700, Tom Stellard via Release-testers >> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I would like to propose a few changes to the LLVM release process. The >>> current process is documented he

  1   2   3   >