[Bug 1870758] Re: [nvidia] Display scaling results in monitor power save state

** Tags added: champagne -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to mutter in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1870758 Title: [nvidia] Display scaling results in a blank screen (power save state) To manage notifications

[Bug 1870758] Re: [nvidia] Display scaling results in monitor power save state

** Tags added: champagne -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1870758 Title: [nvidia] Display scaling results in a blank screen (power save state) To manage notifications about this bug go

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1870758] Re: [nvidia] Display scaling results in monitor power save state

** Tags added: champagne -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to mutter in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1870758 Title: [nvidia] Display scaling results in a blank screen (power save state) Status in mutter package i

[Yahoo-eng-team] [Bug 1806504] Re: userdata runcmd overwrites runcmd under cloud.cfg.d

** Changed in: juju Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo! Engineering Team, which is subscribed to cloud-init. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1806504 Title: userdata runcmd overwrites runcmd under cloud.cfg.d Status in cloud-in

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1821961] Re: Fix for dual Intel NVMes

Hey there, tested the proposed -48 kernel. Did 15 reboot cycles and everything started every time. Last time it succeeded approximately 90% of the time. That is whey I went to 15 this time. Seems good. ** Tags removed: verification-needed-bionic ** Tags added: verification-done-bionic -- You rec

[Bug 1821961] Re: Fix for dual Intel NVMes

Hey there, tested the proposed -48 kernel. Did 15 reboot cycles and everything started every time. Last time it succeeded approximately 90% of the time. That is whey I went to 15 this time. Seems good. ** Tags removed: verification-needed-bionic ** Tags added: verification-done-bionic -- You rec

[Bug 1816170] Re: KVM instances fail at creation with: Failed to get shared "write" lock Is another process using the image?

** Changed in: juju Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: juju Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: juju Assignee: (unassigned) => Richard Harding (rharding) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. http

Re: [Bug 1811755] Re: X1 Extreme: only one of the two SSDs is loaded

Yes I intend to test the mainline kernel when I'm back home from the sprint On 20/02/19 2:59 AM, Kai-Heng Feng wrote: > Hi Tim, > > Would it be possible for you to test mainline kernel [1]? It probably > requires more commits to be backported. But first let's make sure it's > fully fixed in mainli

Re: [Kernel-packages] [Bug 1811755] Re: X1 Extreme: only one of the two SSDs is loaded

Yes I intend to test the mainline kernel when I'm back home from the sprint On 20/02/19 2:59 AM, Kai-Heng Feng wrote: > Hi Tim, > > Would it be possible for you to test mainline kernel [1]? It probably > requires more commits to be backported. But first let's make sure it's > fully fixed in mainli

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1811755] Re: X1 Extreme: only one of the two SSDs is loaded

It seems my install was missing the linux-generic package. After installing that I was able to get linux-generic 4.15.0.46.48 from bionic-proposed. Installing this removed the windows boot option from my grub config. Rebooting 12 times, 10 times were good, twice I got dumped into initramfs. Photo

[Bug 1811755] Re: X1 Extreme: only one of the two SSDs is loaded

It seems my install was missing the linux-generic package. After installing that I was able to get linux-generic 4.15.0.46.48 from bionic-proposed. Installing this removed the windows boot option from my grub config. Rebooting 12 times, 10 times were good, twice I got dumped into initramfs. Photo

Re: [Kernel-packages] [Bug 1811755] Re: X1 Extreme: only one of the two SSDs is loaded

Will this fix make its way back into the bionic-updates? Tim -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1811755 Title: X1 Extreme: only one of the two SSDs is loaded Status in linu

Re: [Bug 1811755] Re: X1 Extreme: only one of the two SSDs is loaded

Will this fix make its way back into the bionic-updates? Tim -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1811755 Title: X1 Extreme: only one of the two SSDs is loaded To manage notifications abo

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1811755] Re: X1 Extreme: only one of the two SSDs is loaded

got the packages installed in the end, and so far has booted every time. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1811755 Title: X1 Extreme: only one of the two SSDs is loaded Sta

[Bug 1811755] Re: X1 Extreme: only one of the two SSDs is loaded

got the packages installed in the end, and so far has booted every time. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1811755 Title: X1 Extreme: only one of the two SSDs is loaded To manage notifi

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1811755] Re: X1 Extreme: only one of the two SSDs is loaded

hit the following error installing the test kernel tim@terry:~/Downloads$ ls *.deb linux-headers-4.15.0-43-generic_4.15.0-43.46+lp1811755_amd64.deb linux-image-unsigned-4.15.0-43-generic_4.15.0-43.46+lp1811755_amd64.deb linux-modules-4.15.0-43-generic_4.15.0-43.46+lp1811755_amd64.deb linux-modules

[Bug 1811755] Re: X1 Extreme: only one of the two SSDs is loaded

hit the following error installing the test kernel tim@terry:~/Downloads$ ls *.deb linux-headers-4.15.0-43-generic_4.15.0-43.46+lp1811755_amd64.deb linux-image-unsigned-4.15.0-43-generic_4.15.0-43.46+lp1811755_amd64.deb linux-modules-4.15.0-43-generic_4.15.0-43.46+lp1811755_amd64.deb linux-modules

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1811755] Re: X1 Extreme: only one of the two SSDs is loaded

Yes, I can boot into the 512G disk approximately 50% of the time :-) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1811755 Title: X1 Extreme: only one of the two SSDs is loaded Status

[Bug 1811755] Re: X1 Extreme: only one of the two SSDs is loaded

Yes, I can boot into the 512G disk approximately 50% of the time :-) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1811755 Title: X1 Extreme: only one of the two SSDs is loaded To manage notificati

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1811755] [NEW] X1 Extreme: only one of the two SSDs is loaded

Public bug reported: I bought a new Thinkpad X1 Extreme, and had it come with two SSDs, one 256G and the other 512G with the intention of keeping the windows on the 256G disk and using the 512G for linux. When dealing with the installer, it only ever saw one of the SSDs. I did manged to get bioni

[Bug 1811755] [NEW] X1 Extreme: only one of the two SSDs is loaded

Public bug reported: I bought a new Thinkpad X1 Extreme, and had it come with two SSDs, one 256G and the other 512G with the intention of keeping the windows on the 256G disk and using the 512G for linux. When dealing with the installer, it only ever saw one of the SSDs. I did manged to get bioni

Moving conversations to discourse and closing this list.

Hi all, Juju is moving with the times and moving to have a central place for conversations, questions, and soon, documentation. We are using Discourse [1] and it can be found here: https://discourse.jujucharms.com/ Discourse offers a very nice interface for conversations, and has a bot walk y

Moving conversations to discourse and closing this list.

Hi all, Juju is moving with the times and moving to have a central place for conversations, questions, and soon, documentation. We are using Discourse [1] and it can be found here: https://discourse.jujucharms.com/ Discourse offers a very nice interface for conversations, and has a bot walk y

Re: Aggregate all bundle.yaml | API endpoint

On 14/07/18 17:23, Ilias Tsoumas wrote: > Hello Mark, > > For the sake of clarification, let's try to explain my thoughts. I want > to understand if I can use juju's bundles as directed (acyclic) graphs. > Is there the information about direction? If no, do you propose to use > the bundles as undi

[Bug 1727355] Re: Juju attempts to bootstrap bionic by default

** Changed in: juju-core Status: New => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1727355 Title: Juju attempts to bootstrap bionic by default To manage notifications about this

[Group.of.nepali.translators] [Bug 1727355] Re: Juju attempts to bootstrap bionic by default

** Changed in: juju-core Status: New => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of नेपाली भाषा समायोजकहरुको समूह, which is subscribed to Xenial. Matching subscriptions: Ubuntu 16.04 Bugs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1727355 Title: Juju attempts to boo

Re: LXD on Manual incorrect resolv.conf

Am I right in assuming that you are bringing up bionic containers? On 27/06/18 10:09, Tom Barber wrote: > Ah right, apologies, the IP address is provided by the LXD default bridge. > > > On 26 June 2018 at 22:31:12, Tim Penhey (tim.pen...@canonical.com > <mailto:tim.pen...@can

Re: LXD on Manual incorrect resolv.conf

ows connection to the WWW, why doesn’t Juju, it > seems both reasonable and logical? I guess thats my expectation, > considering the containers need to apt-get etc. > > Juju is 2.3.7 > > Tom > > > On 26 June 2018 at 21:57:21, Tim Penhey (tim.pen...@canonical.com >

Re: LXD on Manual incorrect resolv.conf

Hi Tom, What is your expectation on how the containers are getting their IP addresses? Also, which version of Juju? Tim On 27/06/18 08:29, Tom Barber wrote: > Hi folks, > > I’m trying to do a manual cloud with LXD containers within it. > > When I manually launch and LXD container I get  > >

Re: EC2 availability zones and bundles

I don't believe this is possible with bundles at the moment. The only placement directives that is currently supported in bundles are: new lxd:new lxd: kvm:new kvm: I *think* that is it. Tim On 16/06/18 05:57, George Kraft wrote: > Hey folks, > > Is there a way to assign units or

We are pulling he 2.3.6 agents

Hey people, We have field reports where a 2.3.6 upgrade interacted badly with some charm settings causing Juju to get itself into a stuck, somewhat corrupt state. We are still evaluating how to fix this for stuck systems. The symptom is the 2.3.6 upgrade fails and gets stuck. The agents are bein

We are pulling he 2.3.6 agents

Hey people, We have field reports where a 2.3.6 upgrade interacted badly with some charm settings causing Juju to get itself into a stuck, somewhat corrupt state. We are still evaluating how to fix this for stuck systems. The symptom is the 2.3.6 upgrade fails and gets stuck. The agents are bein

Re: Juju's dependencies, juju/utils and a road forward

Which then begs the question... Why do we have stable gopkg.in branches depending on unstable branches? i.e. gopkg.in/juju/charmstore.v5 depending on gopkg.in/macaroon-bakery.v2-unstable? This seems to smell bad. Tim On 04/04/18 14:17, Tim Penhey wrote: > As a follow on... > > I&

Re: Juju's dependencies, juju/utils and a road forward

As a follow on... I'd like to move juju to only use "stable" dependency branches. No more '-unstable'. Tim On 04/04/18 12:52, Tim Penhey wrote: > Hi folks, > > Juju has a problem with its dependencies. We have been trying to upgrade > a number of our

Juju's dependencies, juju/utils and a road forward

Hi folks, Juju has a problem with its dependencies. We have been trying to upgrade a number of our dependencies recently have have been hitting road blocks. Mostly because of changes to common libraries that are incompatible with other libraries that we use. I'm pretty sure that the root of all t

Re: More juju upgrade-juju failings

that we have a shared Google doc to mock up a nice > experience starting with the simple command 'juju upgrade' which then > walks people through the process, including the distinction between > upgrading charms, agents and controllers, as well as the ability to do

Intro to Juju webinar in about 13 hours

Hi folks, I'm going to be presenting an Introduction to Juju on the BrightTALK platform tomorrow morning (my time). https://www.brighttalk.com/webcast/6793/298241 It is a high level introduction, nothing too technical, and ideal for someone that has no understanding of Juju wondering whether or

Re: More juju upgrade-juju failings

Hi Daniel, The issue here is that you are upgrading the default model, not the controller model itself. I think we could make the error messaging more clear, and also have the command also check the controller version before showing a lot of baffling output. What you need to do is upgrade the co

Re: More juju upgrade-juju failings

Hi Daniel, The issue here is that you are upgrading the default model, not the controller model itself. I think we could make the error messaging more clear, and also have the command also check the controller version before showing a lot of baffling output. What you need to do is upgrade the co

Re: juju 2.3.3 failing to bootstrap localhost

How did you login to the container? It sounds like you may be missing SSH logins? Tim On 22/02/18 14:32, fengxia wrote: > Verified by login to the container. I could `apt update`, `apt install > htop`. > > At juju bootstrap terminal, I picked up this error message: > > 01:27:52 DEBUG juju.provi

2.3.3 delayed slightly

Hi folks, Just to let you know that the 2.3.3 release that was planned for today is going to be delayed a day or two while we fix some upgrade issues that were caught late. At least they were caught before the release, so that is a good thing. Cheers, Tim -- Juju-dev mailing list Juju-dev@list

Beware 2.2.7 release

Hi folks, Last night we were alerted to a fundamental issue with the 2.2.7 agent only release. There was a weird race condition that was only observable on larger models which would cause a model to be non-responsive to controller generated events, like config updates, actions, juju run etc. We

Beware 2.2.7 release

Hi folks, Last night we were alerted to a fundamental issue with the 2.2.7 agent only release. There was a weird race condition that was only observable on larger models which would cause a model to be non-responsive to controller generated events, like config updates, actions, juju run etc. We

[Bug 1729127] Re: storage: No available machine matches constraints

** Changed in: juju Milestone: None => 2.3.2 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1729127 Title: storage: No available machine matches constraints To manage notifications about this bu

Re: Juju 2.3-rc2 is here!

Hi Merlijn, You should be able to go: juju upgrade-juju -m controller That should do the trick. If the client version is different you may want to specify the agent version: juju upgrade-juju -m controller --agent-version 2.3-rc2 Tim On 07/12/17 06:26, Merlijn Sebrechts wrote: > Is there a

Re: Juju 2.3-rc2 is here!

Hi Merlijn, You should be able to go: juju upgrade-juju -m controller That should do the trick. If the client version is different you may want to specify the agent version: juju upgrade-juju -m controller --agent-version 2.3-rc2 Tim On 07/12/17 06:26, Merlijn Sebrechts wrote: > Is there a

Re: Debug logs

What is the logging level for the model? The output from the hooks are logged at debug level. Tim On 26/11/17 13:25, Tom Barber wrote: > Maybe its just me, I dunno. > > Has the amount of detail in debug-logs decreased? > > I'm  not seeing failure causes for example: > > 2017-11-26 00:11:18 IN

Re: How to open port with juju when no application is instlaled?

I think you might be able to use: juju run postgresql/0 'open-port 80' Tim On 24/11/17 06:54, Akshat Jiwan Sharma wrote: > Hi, > > I've used juju to deploy postgres on aws. On the same machine I've > installed an nginx server manually (i.e without juju) that listens on > ports 80 and 443. I w

Re: Juju 2.3 beta2 is here!

On 10/11/17 12:12, Dmitrii Shcherbakov wrote: > It's situations like the following that I am trying to avoid: > >   rabbitmq-server: >     charm: cs:xenial/rabbitmq-server >     bindings: >       "": *oam-space >       amqp: *internal-space >       cluster: *internal-space >     options: >       s

Re: Juju 2.3 beta2 is here!

here. > > I like the thrust of Tim's suggestion for "existing" but I'm not > entirely sure about that word - it's quite long and it doesn't quite > express the identity relationship that I see there. How about "same"? > > For exam

Re: Juju 2.3 beta2 is here!

On 09/11/17 13:06, Mark Shuttleworth wrote: > On 11/07/2017 03:11 PM, John Meinel wrote: >> ... >>   >> >> > Perhaps just: >> > >> >   juju deploy --map-machines A=B,C=D >> > >> > ... or some variant of that? >> > >> > Let's use the betas to refine and condense and cla

Re: Juju 2.3 beta2 is here!

On 09/11/17 13:06, Mark Shuttleworth wrote: > On 11/07/2017 03:11 PM, John Meinel wrote: >> ... >>   >> >> > Perhaps just: >> > >> >   juju deploy --map-machines A=B,C=D >> > >> > ... or some variant of that? >> > >> > Let's use the betas to refine and condense and clari

[Bug 1729127] Re: storage: No available machine matches constraints

** Changed in: juju Milestone: 2.3.0 => 2.3-beta3 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1729127 Title: storage: No available machine matches constraints To manage notifications about th

Juju 2.3 release train starting

Hi folks, We are gearing up to release Juju 2.3. Juju 2.3 brings two headline features: * Cross model relations - the ability to relate applications in different models * Persistent storage - storage can outlive the unit or model it was created for. The team will be releasing 2.3-beta1 tomorrow

Juju 2.3 release train starting

Hi folks, We are gearing up to release Juju 2.3. Juju 2.3 brings two headline features: * Cross model relations - the ability to relate applications in different models * Persistent storage - storage can outlive the unit or model it was created for. The team will be releasing 2.3-beta1 tomorrow

Re: We are excited to announce the release of Juju 2.2.3!

We are still getting the docs updated. https://jujucharms.com/docs/2.2/charms-bundles#setting-charm-configurations-options-in-a-bundle has a note about the include-file:// and include-base64:// items. We still seem to be missing details about --bundle-config. Tim On 08/09/17 22:41, Sandor Zeest

Re: We are excited to announce the release of Juju 2.2.3!

We are still getting the docs updated. https://jujucharms.com/docs/2.2/charms-bundles#setting-charm-configurations-options-in-a-bundle has a note about the include-file:// and include-base64:// items. We still seem to be missing details about --bundle-config. Tim On 08/09/17 22:41, Sandor Zeest

Re: developer commands

very dev focused, and both only usable by admins. Tim On 29/08/17 13:11, Andrew Wilkins wrote: > On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 5:17 PM Tim Penhey <mailto:tim.pen...@canonical.com>> wrote: > > FYI, the developer commands were originally designed like the controller > comman

Re: developer commands

FYI, the developer commands were originally designed like the controller commands. You don't say "juju destroy-model -m foo". Tim On 28/08/17 19:48, Anastasia Macmood wrote: > Hi > > Just a quick note for developers that use developer commands. > > 'juju dump-model' and 'juju dump-db' are chan

Re: developer commands

binMOC2fYDKR9.bin Description: PGP/MIME version identification encrypted.asc Description: OpenPGP encrypted message -- Juju-dev mailing list Juju-dev@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev

Re: LXD bootstrap inside KVM failed

Yep, that is pretty strange. Why was bind running? Tim On 03/08/17 07:45, fengxia wrote: > For anyone, the solution is rather strange: > > $ sudo service stop bind9 > > $ sudo lxd start > > Reference: https://github.com/lxc/lxd/issues/2046 > > > On 08/02/2017 03:33 PM, fengxia wrote: >> Hi J

[Bug 1708058] Re: machine locks up - completely non-responsive

This appears to be happening once or twice a day. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1708058 Title: machine locks up - completely non-responsive To manage notifications about this bug go

[Bug 1708058] Re: machine locks up - completely non-responsive

Added above stacktrace to pastebin for easier reading: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/25223455/ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1708058 Title: machine locks up - completely non-responsive

[Bug 1708058] [NEW] machine locks up - completely non-responsive

Public bug reported: Starting a few days ago, machine will just lock up. After the most recent lock up, I looked in /var/log/syslog, and found the following: Aug 2 12:17:01 elwood kernel: [58062.900931] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0018 Aug 2 12:17:01 el

Re: Organising apiserver facades

I agree with John. Having the agent facades separate from the client facades would also be good. Tim On 06/07/17 23:09, John Meinel wrote: > I'd really like to see us split apart the facades-by-purpose. So we'd > collect the facades for Agents separately from facades for Users (and > possibly als

Re: Upgrading juju2

On 13/06/17 04:25, Mario Splivalo wrote: > Hi, ladies and lads! > > I am verifying the juju upgrade procedure and I ran into some > ‘misunderstandings’ which I’m hoping could be clarified out here. > > I am running juju 2.0.0 and the plan is to upgrade it to the latest 2.1 > version, which is cur

Re: We are excited to announce the release of Juju 2.2.1!

Yes indeed. Congratulations to the whole team. Tim On 23/06/17 23:35, Ante Karamatić wrote: > Congrats! > > Excellent release and some of our high profile users are already on > 2.2.1 as of now. The fact that one can just upgrade big > environments like that, while drinking coffee, speaks

Re: We are excited to announce the release of Juju 2.2.1!

Yes indeed. Congratulations to the whole team. Tim On 23/06/17 23:35, Ante Karamatić wrote: > Congrats! > > Excellent release and some of our high profile users are already on > 2.2.1 as of now. The fact that one can just upgrade big > environments like that, while drinking coffee, speaks

Release schedule

Hi folks, 2.2.1 should be released hopefully by this time tomorrow. It includes a number of key fixes that didn't quite make the 2.2.0 release but were sufficiently important that we wanted to get another release out quick smart. >From now we will enter what we hope to be a four week cadence for

Re: Maximum AllWatcher frame size?

It is configured in juju // Use a 64k frame size for the websockets while we need to deal // with x/net/websocket connections that don't deal with recieving // fragmented messages. const websocketFrameSize = 65536 On 14/06/17 12:00, Cory Johns wrote: > Do we know what size the gorilla/websocket

develop has been branched in preparation of 2.2-rc1 release

Hi all, develop is now the future 2.3 branch. A patch will be landing soon to bump the version. There is now a 2.2 branch. This branch will be used for the 2.2 release candidate. Landings onto this branch are currently restricted. The restriction will be lifted when 2.2.0 is released. Thanks, Ti

Re: Weekly Development Summary - and Juju 2.2-rc1 date

On 02/06/17 18:07, Anastasia Macmood wrote: > On 02/06/17 15:11, Tim Penhey wrote: ... >> Once we have confirmation from Solutions QA and JAAS that they are happy >> with the release candidate, we will release is as 2.0.0 > 2.2.0 maybe? Yes. That is what I meant. Thanks,

Weekly Development Summary - and Juju 2.2-rc1 date

Hi all, Sorry for the weird encrypted one. The date for the release candidate is Tuesday the 6th of June. We really wanted to get it out this week, but we hit two issues that we just had to get done before the release candidate. We decided that a few extra days for a better quality release was wo

Weekly Development Summary - and Juju 2.2-rc1 date

bintUcW_UQOrQ.bin Description: PGP/MIME version identification encrypted.asc Description: OpenPGP encrypted message -- Juju-dev mailing list Juju-dev@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju-dev

[Bug 1602192] Re: when starting many LXD containers, they start failing to boot with "Too many open files"

** No longer affects: juju -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1602192 Title: when starting many LXD containers, they start failing to boot with "Too many open files" To manage notifica

[Bug 1475260] Re: instances cannot resolve their own hostname

Is at least fixed on 2.1.3 ** Changed in: juju Status: Triaged => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1475260 Title: instances cannot resolve their own hostname To ma

Re: /etc/juju/certs.d status?

Pretty sure it can be removed and cleaned up now. Thanks Roger On 25/05/17 02:22, roger peppe wrote: I recently came across the code introduced by https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/2294 which provides support for reading extra certificates from /etc/juju/certs.d when connecting to an API server

2.2-rc1 progress

Hi folks, The development team is fully focused on fixing the remaining issues for the upcoming release candidate. The key things that still need to be done before the release candidate are: * fixing migration of models using local charms and local resources * adding robustness around deal

Scale testing analysis

Hi folks, We had another scale test today to analyse why the controller CPU usage didn't fall away as expected when the models were removed. I'll be filing a bunch of bugs from the analysis process, but there is one bug that is, I believe, the culprit for the high CPU usage. Interestingly e

Re: PROPOSAL: stop recording 'executing update-status hook'

On 20/05/17 19:48, Merlijn Sebrechts wrote: On May 20, 2017 09:05, "John Meinel" > wrote: I would actually prefer if it shows up in 'juju status' but that we suppress it from 'juju status-log' by default. This is still very strange behavior. Why should th

Re: PROPOSAL: stop recording 'executing update-status hook'

On 20/05/17 19:48, Merlijn Sebrechts wrote: On May 20, 2017 09:05, "John Meinel" > wrote: I would actually prefer if it shows up in 'juju status' but that we suppress it from 'juju status-log' by default. This is still very strange behavior. Why should th

Re: PROPOSAL: stop recording 'executing update-status hook'

On 19/05/17 19:21, roger peppe wrote: On 19 May 2017 at 03:13, Tim Penhey wrote: Hi folks, Currently juju will update the status of any hook execution for any unit to show that it is busy doing things. This was all well and good until we do things based on time. Every five minutes (or so

Re: PROPOSAL: stop recording 'executing update-status hook'

On 19/05/17 19:21, roger peppe wrote: On 19 May 2017 at 03:13, Tim Penhey wrote: Hi folks, Currently juju will update the status of any hook execution for any unit to show that it is busy doing things. This was all well and good until we do things based on time. Every five minutes (or so

Re: django charm broken or am I just doing it wrong?

05/17 04:15, John Meinel wrote: I believe Tim Penhey makes active use of the python-django charm, but it's possible he uses it in a different fashion. John =:-> On May 21, 2017 14:25, "Erik Lönroth" <mailto:erik.lonr...@gmail.com>> wrote: Hello! I'm tr

PROPOSAL: stop recording 'executing update-status hook'

Hi folks, Currently juju will update the status of any hook execution for any unit to show that it is busy doing things. This was all well and good until we do things based on time. Every five minutes (or so) each unit will have the update-status hook executed to allow the unit to set or upd

PROPOSAL: stop recording 'executing update-status hook'

Hi folks, Currently juju will update the status of any hook execution for any unit to show that it is busy doing things. This was all well and good until we do things based on time. Every five minutes (or so) each unit will have the update-status hook executed to allow the unit to set or upd

Weekly Development Summary

Hi folks, We are trying a new initiative to provide a simple way for casual observers of the mailing list to be able to get a quick view into the work being done in Juju. There are several key areas of development that are ongoing within the Juju team. Polish for the upcoming 2.2 release.

Re: Constraints for Additional Units

On 17/03/17 14:23, James Beedy wrote: Currently, if I scale the units of my application, the new units do not have the same constraints as the previously deployed units. Well, I certainly think they should be carrying over the constraints as the constraints are set on the application, not the

Re: Constraints for Additional Units

On 17/03/17 14:23, James Beedy wrote: Currently, if I scale the units of my application, the new units do not have the same constraints as the previously deployed units. Well, I certainly think they should be carrying over the constraints as the constraints are set on the application, not the

[Bug 1516989] Re: juju status broken

WARNING: don't use the script in comment #16, but instead use this one: http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/24186473/ This is a copy of the earlier script but adds in the txn-revno and txn- queue fields that are required for when juju wants to update the status to something new. -- You received this bug

Re: Juju Snap Changes

Thanks Nicholas, Sounds awesome. Tim On 01/03/17 08:52, Nicholas Skaggs wrote: Those of you subscribed to a snap channel may have noticed some nice changes that happened with 2.1 release. The juju snap package now utilizes classic mode, and all channels (including stable) are now active. You s

Re: regression: restore-backup broken by recent commit

abnormal closure. In the rpc layer, I capture a number of websocket close errors as "normal", but I missed the Abnormal closure case, which is 1006. I'll update, and repropose to devel. Hazaah. Tim On 24/02/17 16:17, Tim Penhey wrote: Hi Curtis (also expanding to juju-dev

Re: regression: restore-backup broken by recent commit

On 24/02/17 16:17, Tim Penhey wrote: Also, a CI run of a develop revision just before the gorilla/websocket reversion hit this: http://reports.vapour.ws/releases/4922/job/functional-ha-backup-restore/attempt/5045#highlight cannot create collection "txns": unauthorized mongo a

Re: regression: restore-backup broken by recent commit

Hi Curtis (also expanding to juju-dev), I have been looking into this issue. And the good news is that it doesn't appear to be a real problem with gorilla/websocket at all, but instead a change in timing showed an existing issue that hadn't surfaced before. I'll be looking into that issue -

Re: removing colours from loggo package

Tech board says "yes let's do it", I'll respond to PR. On 22/02/17 14:15, Andrew Wilkins wrote: On Tue, Feb 21, 2017 at 10:02 PM roger peppe mailto:roger.pe...@canonical.com>> wrote: In August, the loggo package was changed to make it log ANSI-terminal colour escape sequences by default

Change in underlying websocket library

Hi folks, Just merged into the "devel" branch (will be 2.2 branch) is a change in the library Juju is using for websockets. Hopefully you won't notice a thing, but if you do see strange interactions I'd love to know. I did test with new CLI / old controller, and it works, and tested with n

[Bug 1543660] Re: juju needs to fix the yaml parser

** Changed in: juju Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1543660 Title: juju needs to fix the yaml parser To manage notifications about this bug

[Bug 1543660] Re: juju needs to fix the yaml parser

Pull request up for the upstream project: https://github.com/go- yaml/yaml/pull/241. Juju patching the upstream for its builds: https://github.com/juju/juju/pull/6983 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launch

[Bug 1543660] Re: juju needs to fix the yaml parser

** Changed in: juju Assignee: (unassigned) => Tim Penhey (thumper) ** Changed in: juju Status: Triaged => In Progress ** Changed in: juju Milestone: 2.2.0 => 2.1.0 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 1543660] Re: juju needs to fix the yaml parser

Having to push this off the 2.1 milestone due to the dependent library not supporting this use case. ** Changed in: juju Milestone: 2.1.0 => 2.2.0 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/154

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >