** Description changed:
- Missing source for http://dell.archive.canonical.com. I have contacted
- Dell, and they directed me to Canonical Security, who directed me to
- enter a bug here. Note that I upgraded to Ubuntu 24.04.02 about 4 months
- ago and the problem started happening only a couple m
actually, the corresponding sources file is missing the "signed by"
line... Can I just manually add that? And what would be the value?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2104843
Title:
a
Any ideas? Can I just refresh the sources somehow?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2104843
Title:
apt update fails to find source
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https:/
Any ideas? Can I just rebuild the list of sources?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2104843
Title:
apt update fails to find source
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https:/
After the mv command doing update gets me:
/etc/apt/sources.list.d$ sudo apt update
Hit:1 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu noble InRelease
Hit:2 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu noble-security InRelease
Hit:3 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu noble-updates InRelease
Hit:4 http://archive.ub
Hi Eduardo,
we were facing similiar issues with a "heavy-load-application" and torque 3.2. The application uses four connection
pools and many connections with a lot of concurrent transactions. The stack trace of the exception was the same as
yours. Other torque based applications developed by
Hi Daniel,
afaik it is neither the job of a ORM-tool nor is it possible at all to secure
such a layer against
SQL-injection. Torque does explicitly allow the usage of custom SQL. Hence some
kind of SQL-injection
is a real feature (in terms of extensibility and flexibility) in an ORM-tool
and n
Hi Ivan,
> I use Torque 3.0 with Postgres and have following problem:
3.0 is a little bit out-dated, isn't it? ;-)
> After deleting some concrete object with usual
> ClassNamePeer.doDelete(objectToDelete), I can still see it in database when
> querying for that objects information with plain JDB
Hi,
you have to provide the used Oracle schema in build.properties, eg.
torque.database.schema = TEST
see the properties reference for details:
http://db.apache.org/torque/generator/properties-reference.html
Micha
Derek Anderson wrote:
Hey everyone,
I'm trying to generate a schema off our existin
hi,
use P6Spy to log all sql statements:
There already a description about configuration and usage in Torques Wiki:
http://wiki.apache.org/db-torque/FrequentlyAskedQuestions -
just look for the question "How to add P6Spy for printing SQL".
You can download P6Spy from http://www.p6spy.com. It's l
Hi Adrian,
there isn't a copy constructor or an overwritten clone() method in Criteria
yet.
The overwritten putAll(Map t) method is also far away from creating a full
copy
if you use a Criteria as parameter.
It would be a very good and useful thing if the next release of Torque would
contain a Cri
After a short look into several generated sources i have to agree with Alex,
imho these throws declarations are not neccessary for the mentioned
setSomeForeignKey() methods. I would appreciate if the declarations would be
removed with the next release.
so long
Micha
> -Original Message-
>
12 matches
Mail list logo