Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I'm looking for a new maintainer for gp-saml-gui package.
I no longer have access to a GlobalProtect VPN, and therefore it could
become difficult to test certain features which require connection to
one.
Package is in good shape, maintainer is active and responsive
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I'm looking for a new maintainer for gp-saml-gui package.
I no longer have access to a GlobalProtect VPN, and therefore it could
become difficult to test certain features which require connection to
one.
Package is in good shape, maintainer is active and responsive
Control: tag -1 pending
Hello,
Bug #1054862 in debomatic reported by you has been fixed in the
Git repository and is awaiting an upload. You can see the commit
message below and you can check the diff of the fix at:
https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/debomatic/-/commit/7d9a36e0a3f84e0
Control: severity -1 important
Il giorno sab 10 giu 2023 alle ore 01:57 Marc Lehmann
ha scritto:
> while the package installs fine, it immediately crashes on startup:
Most likely a duplicate of bug #1033608, which was a false positive.
--
Cheers,
Luca
Control: severity -1 important
Il giorno sab 10 giu 2023 alle ore 01:57 Marc Lehmann
ha scritto:
> while the package installs fine, it immediately crashes on startup:
Most likely a duplicate of bug #1033608, which was a false positive.
--
Cheers,
Luca
tags 1034219 + patch
thanks
Hi Laurent, hi Andreas,
First of all, thanks for the bug report and for the discussion so far!
Il giorno mer 12 apr 2023 alle ore 10:51 Andreas Henriksson
ha scritto:
> I'm not sure exactly what the best option is to adress this for pybuild
> using packages, but my
tags 1034219 + patch
thanks
Hi Laurent, hi Andreas,
First of all, thanks for the bug report and for the discussion so far!
Il giorno mer 12 apr 2023 alle ore 10:51 Andreas Henriksson
ha scritto:
> I'm not sure exactly what the best option is to adress this for pybuild
> using packages, but my
tags 1033608 + moreinfo + unreproducible
thanks
Hi Ionuț,
Il giorno mar 28 mar 2023 alle ore 16:03 Ionuț Ciocîrlan
ha scritto:
> In the debian package these symlinks are missing, and emptu directories
> are created instead (although the lib files are built and packaged).
I just checked in a fr
tags 1033608 + moreinfo + unreproducible
thanks
Hi Ionuț,
Il giorno mar 28 mar 2023 alle ore 16:03 Ionuț Ciocîrlan
ha scritto:
> In the debian package these symlinks are missing, and emptu directories
> are created instead (although the lib files are built and packaged).
I just checked in a fr
Both ways are fine. If you upload -3 right now, NMU will be rejected
because of the newer version, otherwise it'll reach the archive when
time elapses.
A maintainer upload would be better, though :-)
--
Cheers,
Luca
Both ways are fine. If you upload -3 right now, NMU will be rejected
because of the newer version, otherwise it'll reach the archive when
time elapses.
A maintainer upload would be better, though :-)
--
Cheers,
Luca
Il giorno lun 29 ago 2022 alle ore 07:34 Stephen Gelman
ha scritto:
> Would you be interested in creating a MR for your changes to salsa? If not
> that’s fine, just let me know and I will pull in the changes myself.
Sure, here it is:
https://salsa.debian.org/ssgelm/opentracing-cpp/-/merge_reques
Il giorno lun 29 ago 2022 alle ore 07:34 Stephen Gelman
ha scritto:
> Would you be interested in creating a MR for your changes to salsa? If not
> that’s fine, just let me know and I will pull in the changes myself.
Sure, here it is:
https://salsa.debian.org/ssgelm/opentracing-cpp/-/merge_reques
pload.
+ * debian/patches/catch_SIGSTKSZ.patch:
+- Fix FTBFS with glibc 2.34 (Closes: #1017132).
+
+ -- Luca Falavigna Sun, 28 Aug 2022 11:11:38 +0200
+
opentracing-cpp (1.6.0-2) unstable; urgency=medium
* Upload to unstable
diff -Nru opentracing-cpp-1.6.0/debian/patches/catch_SIGSTKSZ.
pload.
+ * debian/patches/catch_SIGSTKSZ.patch:
+- Fix FTBFS with glibc 2.34 (Closes: #1017132).
+
+ -- Luca Falavigna Sun, 28 Aug 2022 11:11:38 +0200
+
opentracing-cpp (1.6.0-2) unstable; urgency=medium
* Upload to unstable
diff -Nru opentracing-cpp-1.6.0/debian/patches/catch_SIGSTKSZ.
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
A dependency still exists:
Checking reverse dependencies...
# Broken Build-Depends:
perl6-readline: perl6-tap-harness
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
A dependency still exists:
Checking reverse dependencies...
# Broken Depends:
debian-design: design-desktop-web
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
A dependency still exists:
Checking reverse dependencies...
# Broken Build-Depends:
libjxmpp-java: libidn11-java
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
A few dependencies still exist:
Checking reverse dependencies...
# Broken Depends:
bfh-metapackages: bfh-gnome-desktop
progress-linux-metapackages: progress-linux-gnome-desktop
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
A dependency still exists:
Checking reverse dependencies...
# Broken Depends:
openscap-daemon: openscap-daemon
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
A few dependencies still exist:
Checking reverse dependencies...
# Broken Depends:
kmerresistance: kmerresistance [armel armhf i386 mipsel]
resfinder: resfinder
virulencefinder: virulencefinder
# Broken Build-Depends:
resfinder-db: kma
tags 983538 + pending fixed-upstream
thanks
Hi Nicolas,
first of all, thanks a lot for your patches! Most of them were
imported either upstream when relevant or in Salsa, with the exception
of the following:
0003-Merge-paragraphs-files-in-d-copyright.patch
* I prefer to keep holders separate,
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I request an adopter for the ninka package.
The package description is:
Ninka is a lightweight license identification tool for source code. It is
sentence-based, and provides a simple way to identify open source licenses in
a source code file. It is capable of id
Package: wnpp
Severity: normal
I request an adopter for the ninka package.
The package description is:
Ninka is a lightweight license identification tool for source code. It is
sentence-based, and provides a simple way to identify open source licenses in
a source code file. It is capable of id
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Package: ftp.debian.org
Severity: normal
Please remove liblarch from experimental. It has been removed from
unstable as well (see #944568).
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Luca Falavigna
* Package name: gp-saml-gui
Version : 0.0~git20201209.64c01f4+ds-1
Upstream Author : Dan Lenski
* URL : https://github.com/dlenski/gp-saml-gui
* License : GPL-3
Programming Lang: Python
Description
Package: wnpp
Severity: wishlist
Owner: Luca Falavigna
* Package name: gp-saml-gui
Version : 0.0~git20201209.64c01f4+ds-1
Upstream Author : Dan Lenski
* URL : https://github.com/dlenski/gp-saml-gui
* License : GPL-3
Programming Lang: Python
Description
Package: ftp.debian.org
This package was removed from unstable but still has a version in
experimental without a valid reason to keep it (at least according to the
original removal bug). We should get rid of the package in experimental as
well.
Package: ftp.debian.org
This package was removed from unstable but still has a version in
experimental without a valid reason to keep it (at least according to the
original removal bug). We should get rid of the package in experimental as
well.
Package: ftp.debian.org
This package was removed from unstable but still has a version in
experimental without a valid reason to keep it (at least according to the
original removal bug). We should get rid of the package in experimental as
well.
Package: ftp.debian.org
This package was removed from unstable but still has a version in
experimental without a valid reason to keep it (at least according to the
original removal bug). We should get rid of the package in experimental as
well.
Package: ftp.debian.org
This package was removed from unstable but still has a version in
experimental without a valid reason to keep it (at least according to the
original removal bug). We should get rid of the package in experimental as
well.
Package: ftp.debian.org
This package was removed from unstable but still has a version in
experimental without a valid reason to keep it (at least according to the
original removal bug). We should get rid of the package in experimental as
well.
Package: ftp.debian.org
This package was removed from unstable but still has a version in
experimental without a valid reason to keep it (at least according to the
original removal bug). We should get rid of the package in experimental as
well.
Package: ftp.debian.org
This package was removed from unstable but still has a version in
experimental without a valid reason to keep it (at least according to the
original removal bug). We should get rid of the package in experimental as
well.
Package: ftp.debian.org
This package was removed from unstable but still has a version in
experimental without a valid reason to keep it (at least according to the
original removal bug). We should get rid of the package in experimental as
well.
Package: ftp.debian.org
This package was removed from unstable but still has a version in
experimental without a valid reason to keep it (at least according to the
original removal bug). We should get rid of the package in experimental as
well.
tags 931653 moreinfo
thanks
Il giorno lun 8 lug 2019 alle ore 23:09 Xavier Guimard
ha scritto:
> This package has no reverse dependencies, so it can safely be removed
> from Debian archive.
Checking reverse dependencies...
# Broken Build-Depends:
rainloop: node-json3
Hi Simon,
Il giorno gio 11 lug 2019 alle ore 23:24 Simon McVittie
ha scritto:
> I asked for multiple binary packages to be overridden, including but not
> limited to libgtkgl2.0-1:
When fixing overrides, dak can cope with just one override at a time
and then it sends bug mail to -close with just
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2019 21:45:09 +0200
Source: debomatic
Architecture: source
Version: 0.24-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Luca Falavigna
Changed-By: Luca Falavigna
Closes: 925491
Changes:
debomatic (0.24-2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2019 12:40:45 +0200
Source: toposort
Architecture: source
Version: 1.5-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Luca Falavigna
Changed-By: Luca Falavigna
Changes:
toposort (1.5-3) unstable; urgency=medium
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 04 Nov 2018 16:00:55 +0100
Source: debomatic
Binary: debomatic
Architecture: source
Version: 0.24-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Luca Falavigna
Changed-By: Luca Falavigna
Description:
debomatic
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2018 12:43:25 +0200
Source: ninka
Binary: ninka ninka-backend-excel ninka-backend-sqlite
Architecture: source
Version: 1.3.2-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Luca Falavigna
Changed-By: Luca
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 27 May 2018 11:00:22 +0200
Source: debomatic
Binary: debomatic
Architecture: source
Version: 0.23+git20180514-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Luca Falavigna
Changed-By: Luca Falavigna
Description
Hi Hideki,
2018-05-16 2:03 GMT+02:00 Hideki Yamane :
>> See attached patch, against the offending commit. It doesn't apply to
>> master as-is because of the by-hash addition.
>
> Simply initialize "ext" prevents this failure, could you check attached
> patch, please?
I applied to 1.0.98 package
Hi Hideki,
2018-05-16 2:03 GMT+02:00 Hideki Yamane :
>> See attached patch, against the offending commit. It doesn't apply to
>> master as-is because of the by-hash addition.
>
> Simply initialize "ext" prevents this failure, could you check attached
> patch, please?
I applied to 1.0.98 package
Hi Hideki,
2018-05-16 2:03 GMT+02:00 Hideki Yamane :
>> See attached patch, against the offending commit. It doesn't apply to
>> master as-is because of the by-hash addition.
>
> Simply initialize "ext" prevents this failure, could you check attached
> patch, please?
I applied to 1.0.98 package
Hi Paul,
2018-05-16 10:05 GMT+02:00 Paul Gevers :
> The autopkgtest of debomatic in testing is apparently already broken¹
> without the new debootstrap for reasons unclear to me. As a result it
> isn't blocking migration anymore².
This is due to #898738.
--
Cheers,
Luca
found 898738 1.0.97
thanks
Hi,
2018-05-15 21:19 GMT+02:00 Cyril Brulebois :
> The issue seems to be the non-free Packages file being checked against
> the checksum of the contrib one (both sha256 checksum and size in fact),
> so that can't work.
Thanks for checking! Indeed the problem can be r
found 898738 1.0.97
thanks
Hi,
2018-05-15 21:19 GMT+02:00 Cyril Brulebois :
> The issue seems to be the non-free Packages file being checked against
> the checksum of the contrib one (both sha256 checksum and size in fact),
> so that can't work.
Thanks for checking! Indeed the problem can be r
found 898738 1.0.97
thanks
Hi,
2018-05-15 21:19 GMT+02:00 Cyril Brulebois :
> The issue seems to be the non-free Packages file being checked against
> the checksum of the contrib one (both sha256 checksum and size in fact),
> so that can't work.
Thanks for checking! Indeed the problem can be r
Source: debootstrap
Version: 1.0.98
Severity: serious
debootstrap fails when specifying components on command line:
# debootstrap --components=main,contrib,non-free unstable unstable
http://deb.debian.org/debian
I: Target architecture can be executed
I: Checking Release signature
I: Valid Releas
Source: debootstrap
Version: 1.0.98
Severity: serious
debootstrap fails when specifying components on command line:
# debootstrap --components=main,contrib,non-free unstable unstable
http://deb.debian.org/debian
I: Target architecture can be executed
I: Checking Release signature
I: Valid Releas
Source: debootstrap
Version: 1.0.98
Severity: serious
debootstrap fails when specifying components on command line:
# debootstrap --components=main,contrib,non-free unstable unstable
http://deb.debian.org/debian
I: Target architecture can be executed
I: Checking Release signature
I: Valid Releas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 11 May 2018 12:42:54 +0200
Source: bcron
Binary: bcron bcron-run
Architecture: source
Version: 0.11-1.2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Gerrit Pape
Changed-By: Luca Falavigna
Description:
bcron
cuted
+correctly (Closes: #897519).
+
+ -- Luca Falavigna Fri, 11 May 2018 12:42:54 +0200
+
bcron (0.11-1.1) unstable; urgency=medium
* Non-maintainer uppload
diff -Nru bcron-0.11/debian/control bcron-0.11/debian/control
--- bcron-0.11/debian/control 2017-12-13 11:12:18.0
cuted
+correctly (Closes: #897519).
+
+ -- Luca Falavigna Fri, 11 May 2018 12:42:54 +0200
+
bcron (0.11-1.1) unstable; urgency=medium
* Non-maintainer uppload
diff -Nru bcron-0.11/debian/control bcron-0.11/debian/control
--- bcron-0.11/debian/control 2017-12-13 11:12:18.0
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Tue, 01 May 2018 23:25:20 +0200
Source: debomatic
Binary: debomatic
Architecture: source
Version: 0.23-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Luca Falavigna
Changed-By: Luca Falavigna
Description:
debomatic
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2018 21:21:10 +0200
Source: toposort
Binary: python-toposort python3-toposort
Architecture: source
Version: 1.5-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Luca Falavigna
Changed-By: Luca Falavigna
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2018 07:53:11 +0200
Source: ninka
Binary: ninka ninka-backend-excel ninka-backend-sqlite
Architecture: source
Version: 1.3.2-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Luca Falavigna
Changed-By: Luca
Hi Thorsten,
2018-03-06 22:10 GMT+01:00 Thorsten Alteholz :
> [1] https://salsa.debian.org/ftp-team/dak/merge_requests/9
I think daklib/queue.py needs tweaking too, cfr
https://salsa.debian.org/ftp-team/dak/commit/201d7e04ae2533791935ba0c0e9454f913df9c26#2f5b8224379fc6b2ea3cc7571d8fd5385715dec5
Hi Thorsten,
2018-03-06 22:10 GMT+01:00 Thorsten Alteholz :
> [1] https://salsa.debian.org/ftp-team/dak/merge_requests/9
I think daklib/queue.py needs tweaking too, cfr
https://salsa.debian.org/ftp-team/dak/commit/201d7e04ae2533791935ba0c0e9454f913df9c26#2f5b8224379fc6b2ea3cc7571d8fd5385715dec5
Hi Raphaël,
2018-03-04 21:15 GMT+01:00 Raphael Hertzog :
> No, @packages.qa.debian.org never forwarded to
> @packages.debian.org. It's the other way around.
Ah, noted. Thanks for clarifying.
> It works for whatever you want. Ansgar asked me a few questions on
> this topic recently and he said th
Hi Raphaël,
2018-03-04 21:15 GMT+01:00 Raphael Hertzog :
> No, @packages.qa.debian.org never forwarded to
> @packages.debian.org. It's the other way around.
Ah, noted. Thanks for clarifying.
> It works for whatever you want. Ansgar asked me a few questions on
> this topic recently and he said th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2018 13:29:37 +0100
Source: lintian
Binary: lintian
Architecture: source
Version: 2.5.77~bpo9+1
Distribution: stretch-backports
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Lintian Maintainers
Changed-By: Luca Falavigna
Well, recent changes just changed email to
@packages.debian.org, so I'm not convinced this is a bug in
dak itself.
Could it be the small delay while processing mails to
@packages.qa.debian.org (which are then forwarded to
@packages.debian.org) could have hidden this for ages?
Anyway, does the sol
Well, recent changes just changed email to
@packages.debian.org, so I'm not convinced this is a bug in
dak itself.
Could it be the small delay while processing mails to
@packages.qa.debian.org (which are then forwarded to
@packages.debian.org) could have hidden this for ages?
Anyway, does the sol
Hi Yavor,
2018-01-24 18:14 GMT+01:00 Yavor Doganov :
> Package: debomatic
> Version: 0.22-1
> Severity: normal
>
> First of all, thank you for writing and maintaing this package; it's a
> great piece of software.
Thanks!
> The pubring as specified in the repository section in the
> configuratio
2018-02-13 4:18 GMT+01:00 :
>> I suspect that the debomatic sid chroot is out-of-date.
amd64 chroot was updated on Sunday, February 11, 2018 4:20:10 PM UTC
(1518366010.2514317).
--
Cheers,
Luca
2018-02-13 4:18 GMT+01:00 :
>> I suspect that the debomatic sid chroot is out-of-date.
amd64 chroot was updated on Sunday, February 11, 2018 4:20:10 PM UTC
(1518366010.2514317).
--
Cheers,
Luca
Control: tags -1 + wontfix
2017-04-20 10:56 GMT+02:00 Gianfranco Costamagna :
> It started as a joke on #-devel, but it would be nice to have packages with
> epoch bumped
> go in new queue
NEW is for new overrides, not for versions, sorry.
It should be responsibility of maintainers to select an
Should be fixed with this commit:
https://salsa.debian.org/ftp-team/dak/commit/4988d9dd0713705751b962746bb73c56609f7ac6
Given Josh's attempt to provide an updated list, which was limited to
just amd64 and i386, I extracted all the packages with priority
standard or higher from projectb (therefore including all arches by
definition).
File "priorities" contains the full list of packages having standard
or higher prio
Hi Cyril,
2018-01-20 14:14 GMT+01:00 Cyril Brulebois :
> Just as a reminder, priority is archive-wise so we won't have that in
> unstable then in testing, right?
Normally overrides are changed for unstable, but are propagated to
testing during dinstall. If we have a look at a recent override chan
Hi Cyril,
2018-01-20 14:14 GMT+01:00 Cyril Brulebois :
> Just as a reminder, priority is archive-wise so we won't have that in
> unstable then in testing, right?
Normally overrides are changed for unstable, but are propagated to
testing during dinstall. If we have a look at a recent override chan
Hi Cyril,
2018-01-20 14:14 GMT+01:00 Cyril Brulebois :
> Just as a reminder, priority is archive-wise so we won't have that in
> unstable then in testing, right?
Normally overrides are changed for unstable, but are propagated to
testing during dinstall. If we have a look at a recent override chan
Control: tags -1 wontfix
2017-05-01 21:48 GMT+02:00 Ximin Luo :
> Could we relax the ACL for DMs so that they can upload to binary-NEW?
GR 2007-003 [0] clearly states "none of the uploaded packages are NEW".
Allowing that would break what the GR explicitly say.
[0] https://www.debian.org/vote/2
Dear -boot and -cd teams,
could you please comment on the request of demoting library priorities
from required and important to optional?
Thanks,
Luca
Dear -boot and -cd teams,
could you please comment on the request of demoting library priorities
from required and important to optional?
Thanks,
Luca
Dear -boot and -cd teams,
could you please comment on the request of demoting library priorities
from required and important to optional?
Thanks,
Luca
Dear -boot and -cd teams,
could you please comment on the request of demoting wget priority from
important to standard?
Thanks,
Luca
Dear -boot and -cd teams,
could you please comment on the request of demoting wget priority from
important to standard?
Thanks,
Luca
Dear -boot and -cd teams,
could you please comment on the request of demoting wget priority from
important to standard?
Thanks,
Luca
Now patch builds, but apparently unsharing still does not work
because, even if the parameter is set via option, this->unshare_net is
not updated with the correct value.
Suggestions welcome :)
Description: Add support for unshare(CLONE_NEWNET)
Author: Luca Falavigna
Bug-Debian: ht
tags 802849 patch
thanks
I tried cherry-picking patches from master branch, and should have
come to something which can be tested.
Unfortunately it does not build, and can't really figure out the
reason why. I added the tag patch to attract more skilled C++
developers to fix it where I couldn't
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 15:29:23 +0100
Source: debomatic
Binary: debomatic
Architecture: source
Version: 0.22-5
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Luca Falavigna
Changed-By: Luca Falavigna
Description:
debomatic
Hi,
thanks for your bug report!
2017-12-19 17:56 GMT+01:00 marjoram :
> 2. While the first build succeeded, subsequent builds failed.
I tried reproducing the issue but I wasn't able to. Can you share your
configuration file and package, so I can try to debug this issue
further?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2017 15:37:45 +0200
Source: ninka
Binary: ninka ninka-backend-excel ninka-backend-sqlite
Architecture: source all amd64
Version: 1.3.2-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Luca Falavigna
Changed-By: Luca
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 20:09:08 +0200
Source: debomatic
Binary: debomatic
Architecture: source
Version: 0.22-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Luca Falavigna
Changed-By: Luca Falavigna
Description:
debomatic
Hi,
* prose/tag/aptag.go is copyright Matthew Honnibal and licensed under MIT
* prose/tokenize/pragmatic.go is copyright Kevin Dias and licensed under MIT
* prose/tokenize/punkt.go is copyright Eric Bower and licensed under MIT
Please mention these in your copyright file.
Cheers,
Luca
===
P
Hi,
/usr/bin/readme is too generic to be placed under a location defined in PATH.
Would it be possible to use a more specialized name, such as zap-readme?
Cheers,
Luca
___
Pkg-go-maintainers mailing list
Pkg-go-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org
htt
Hi,
* Accelerators/Dax/* have different copyright terms than the one mentioned in
d/copyright
* Please mention license of the font under Charts/Core/Testing/Data/Fonts
* Common/Core/CaseFolding.txt is licensed under
http://www.unicode.org/copyright.html
* Examples/GUI/QT/* are copyright Sandia
Hi,
test/gtest/* are licensed under BSD and copyright Google.
I see in your copyright file you wanted to exclude these files from
the tarball, but apparently they sneaked in anyway.
Cheers,
Luca
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejec
2017-08-30 15:54 GMT+02:00 Dimitri John Ledkov :
> I hope that this email alone is enough for at least some maintainers
> to integrate/schedule this change without the bug overhead
I think this could be a good candidates for a lintian tag to inform
maintainers about the change and to keep track of
Hi,
pkg/topkg.ml is copyright Daniel C. Bünzli and licensed under BSD license.
Cheers,
Luca
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
Hi,
python{,3}-cheetah and python{,3}-flup do not exist in archive, but they're
listed in Recommends.
Wouldn't it make sense to drop them until they're packaged?
Cheers,
Luca
___
Python-modules-team mailing list
Python-modules-team@lists.alioth.debi
Hi,
libdolfin2017.1 gained a dependency on libparmetis4.0, which is in non-free.
Cheers,
Luca
===
Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understand why
your files were rejected, or if you upload new files which address our
concerns.
--
debian-science-maintainers mailing li
Package: apt-utils
Version: 1.4.7
Generating a (In)Release file with apt-ftparchive, I get this date format:
Date: Tuesday, 15 August 2017 23:16:52
APT returns this warning message when attempting to download the Release file:
[...]
W: Invalid 'Date' entry in Release file [...]
[...]
Looking at
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 02 Jul 2017 10:45:48 +0200
Source: debomatic
Binary: debomatic
Architecture: source
Version: 0.22-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Luca Falavigna
Changed-By: Luca Falavigna
Description:
debomatic
1 - 100 of 10739 matches
Mail list logo
