Enkelena Haxhija: Advocate

2025-04-15 Thread Jose M. Calhariz (via nm.debian.org)
+euHiOcfFaQmQJstGX5bCBtDSd5/m2e4= =L1HL -END PGP SIGNATURE- Jose M. Calhariz (via nm.debian.org) For details and to comment, visit https://nm.debian.org/process/1389/ -- https://nm.debian.org/process/1389/

Re: Anyone using amanda 3.5.4 with a tape robot?

2025-03-11 Thread Jose M Calhariz
other server with amanda 3.5.4 and try to reproduce the bug. Kind regards Jose M Calhariz On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 01:57:25AM -0400, Winston Sorfleet wrote: > Post a strace? > > On 2025-03-10 10:09 a.m., Jose M Calhariz wrote: > > Hi Nuno, > > > > On Mon, Mar 10, 202

Re: Anyone using amanda 3.5.4 with a tape robot?

2025-03-10 Thread Jose M Calhariz
that amrecover is failing to use the tape with an error of something like "permission denied" of the tape device. As user root and backup (amanda user on Debian) can use the tape, I do not know what is the problem. > > Cheers, > Nuno Kind regards Jose M Calhariz > >

Anyone using amanda 3.5.4 with a tape robot?

2025-03-08 Thread Jose M Calhariz
me delimit the bug. Kind regards Jose M Calhariz -- -- Mais vale um cachorro amigo que um amigo cachorro. -- Anonimo signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#1021373: Team upload of librep to delayed=10

2025-02-18 Thread Jose M Calhariz
Please do upload without delay. I do not have time to do myself. Thank you. On February 18, 2025 12:57:44 PM GMT+00:00, Andreas Tille wrote: >Control: tags -1 pending >Thanks > >Hi Jose, > >when librep came up as a candidate for the Bug of the Day[1] we realised >that there are a lot of changes

Re: Initial test configuration

2025-02-08 Thread Jose M Calhariz
have with the documentation inside the packages so I can improve on next upload to Debian. Take notice that I prefer authentication by SSH and that is what I promote. Kind regards Jose M Calhariz On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 04:53:26PM -0500, Scott Stadler wrote: > Hello, > > I am attempti

Re: Here's a fix for an old problem (amanda 3.5.4)

2025-01-28 Thread Jose M Calhariz
Hi, Thnak you for the info. By the way I am preparing a new 3.5.4 for Debian, where I am reproducing the know bugs of 3.5.4 and incorporate the patches that fix it. Anyone currently using amanda with S3 storage? Kind regards Jose M Calhariz On Mon, Jan 27, 2025 at 05:00:40PM -0600, Jason

Re: Here's a fix for an old problem (amanda 3.5.4)

2025-01-27 Thread Jose M Calhariz
Hi, there is a place were I can check the Fedora patches to pick the interesting ones for Debian packaging of amanda. Kind regards Jose M Calhariz On Sun, Jan 26, 2025 at 07:43:56PM -0800, Lou Hafer wrote: > Folks, > > Back in July 2023 I wrote asking about a problem with amanda a

Bug#1093028: bcache-tools: On reboot fails to setup an existing bcache

2025-01-14 Thread Jose M Calhariz
X (udev-worker)[3576]: nvme0n1p1: Process 'bcache-register /dev/nvme0n1p1' failed with exit code 1. Jan 14 17:27:54 X kernel: bcache: register_bcache() error : device already registered Kind regards Jose M Calhariz -- System Information: Debian Release: 12.8 APT prefers stable-updat

Bug#988530: Why amanda uses user backup

2025-01-13 Thread Jose M Calhariz
means that when a other sysadmin touch a Debian a amanda client I see the problem on next day amanda report. So the amanda server can not run unsupervised and the same for the clients. Kind regards Jose M Calhariz -- -- Escola é o melhor negócio do mundo. Pega o freguês com 6 anos de idade e

Bug#1091732: linux-image-6.11.10+bpo-amd64: Kernel fail to setup video correctly on server Dell PowerEdge R660

2025-01-03 Thread Jose M Calhariz
Hi, Just found this affects the older Dell PowerEdge R750. Probably the video hardware and the iDRAC 9 uses the same hardware than R660. Kind regards Jose M Calhariz -- -- Para bom entendedor meia palavra basta. Entendeu ...ecil? --Millôr Fernandes Retirado de http://www.uol.com.br/millor

Bug#1091732: linux-image-6.11.10+bpo-amd64: Kernel fail to setup video correctly on server Dell PowerEdge R660

2025-01-03 Thread Jose M Calhariz
Hi, Just found this affects the older Dell PowerEdge R750. Probably the video hardware and the iDRAC 9 uses the same hardware than R660. Kind regards Jose M Calhariz -- -- Para bom entendedor meia palavra basta. Entendeu ...ecil? --Millôr Fernandes Retirado de http://www.uol.com.br/millor

Bug#1089282: amanda: diff for NMU version 1:3.5.4-1.1

2025-01-02 Thread Jose M Calhariz
Thank you for your work. Please upload without delay. On January 2, 2025 5:42:22 PM GMT+00:00, Niels Thykier wrote: >Control: tags 1089282 + patch >Control: tags 1089282 + pending > > >Dear maintainer, > >I've prepared an NMU for amanda (versioned as 1:3.5.4-1.1) and >uploaded it to DELAYED/5.

Re: [OpenAFS] How to Upgrade 1.6. to 1.8

2024-11-12 Thread Jose M Calhariz
rying to understand > https://docs.openafs.org/AdminGuide but would appreciate > help from experienced users. > > Is it possible to have mixed fileserver versions ( 1.6 vs. 1.8) in a Cell? > What are caveats? > Is there a better strategy with less risk to migrate the server? > &

Re: [OpenAFS] Setup on RHEL8 or AlmaLinux8 sssd for openafs with ldap and kerberos

2024-10-22 Thread Jose M Calhariz
Hi, On Sun, Oct 20, 2024 at 08:59:59AM +0200, Dirk Heinrichs wrote: > Jose M Calhariz: > > > I have a minimal idea about what is missing, > > You need pam-afs-session to get tokens at login time. That is correct on CentOS 6 and 7 or a Debian derivative. But on RHEL 8

[OpenAFS] Setup on RHEL8 or AlmaLinux8 sssd for openafs with ldap and kerberos

2024-10-19 Thread Jose M Calhariz
M Calhariz -- -- Nada estraga tanto uma confissão quanto o arrependimento. -- Anatole France signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#1075443: rep-gtk uploaded to DELAYED=10

2024-09-11 Thread Jose M Calhariz
Thank you for your time. You may upload the package to the no delay queue, I will check it when I have free time. On September 10, 2024 11:00:47 AM GMT+01:00, Andreas Tille wrote: >Control: tags -1 pending >Thanks > >Hi Jose, > >your package rep-gtk was showing up in the list of candidates for

Bug#1075443: rep-gtk uploaded to DELAYED=10

2024-09-11 Thread Jose M Calhariz
Thank you for your time. You may upload the package to the no delay queue, I will check it when I have free time. On September 10, 2024 11:00:47 AM GMT+01:00, Andreas Tille wrote: >Control: tags -1 pending >Thanks > >Hi Jose, > >your package rep-gtk was showing up in the list of candidates for

Re: What does this error mean?

2024-08-01 Thread Jose M Calhariz
On Thu, Aug 01, 2024 at 10:52:48PM -0400, Robert Heller wrote: > > > At Fri, 2 Aug 2024 02:20:26 +0100 Jose M Calhariz > wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Aug 01, 2024 at 12:39:46AM -0400, Robert Heller wrote: > > > > > > Any clue as to a "release

Re: What does this error mean?

2024-08-01 Thread Jose M Calhariz
12, but I do not have computers for other CPUs than intel. Kind regards Jose M Calhariz > > At Tue, 23 Jul 2024 03:07:37 +0100 Jose M Calhariz > wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > Currently I do not have a setup with S3 at amanda, so this kind of > > prob

Re: What does this error mean?

2024-07-22 Thread Jose M Calhariz
provide non official packages for Debian v12 of an updated amanda, possibly 3.5.4. Kind regards Jose M Calhariz On Mon, Jul 22, 2024 at 01:49:21PM -0400, Robert Heller wrote: > I opened an issue: https://github.com/zmanda/amanda/issues/259 > > I uploaded the *working* configs for Amanda 3.

Re: [OpenAFS] Help setting up openafs on debian bookworm

2024-06-04 Thread Jose M Calhariz
, until then is a beast that can easily bite you. Kind regards Jose M Calhariz On Sun, Jun 02, 2024 at 12:18:54PM -0400, Ernesto Alfonso wrote: > Dirk Heinrichs: > > Because you deleted the wrong key. The AFS principal should be named > "afs/@". Just follow the instr

Bug#1069152: RM: xorp -- RoQA; FTBFS since 2019, not part of bullseye, bookworm or trixie, popcon 2

2024-04-17 Thread Jose M Calhariz
I agree. On April 17, 2024 8:00:48 AM GMT+01:00, Helmut Grohne wrote: >Package: ftp.debian.org >Severity: normal >Tags: ftbfs >X-Debbugs-Cc: x...@packages.debian.org, Jose M Calhariz , >Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pen~a , Mattia Rizzolo > >Control: affects -1 + src:x

Bug#1054012: at: defer placement of systemd unit to systemd's pkgconf file

2023-12-17 Thread Jose M Calhariz
Hi, Can anyone do a NMU? I have no success in finding free time to work on this and I do not want to delay more this fix. Kind regards Jose M Calhariz On 12/8/23 21:22, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote: Hi at Maintainers, Hi Jose, Ansgar, On Sun, Oct 15, 2023 at 11:15:44AM +0200, Helmut Grohne

Bug#1055253: amanda: diff for NMU version 1:3.5.1-11.1

2023-12-03 Thread Jose M Calhariz
Thank you for your work. No need for the delay. Kind regards. Jose M Calhariz On December 3, 2023 1:14:09 PM GMT+00:00, Tobias Frost wrote: >Control: tags 1055253 + patch >Control: tags 1055253 + pending > >Dear maintainer, > >I've prepared an NMU for amanda (version

Bug#1055253: amanda: diff for NMU version 1:3.5.1-11.1

2023-12-03 Thread Jose M Calhariz
Thank you for your work. No need for the delay. Kind regards. Jose M Calhariz On December 3, 2023 1:14:09 PM GMT+00:00, Tobias Frost wrote: >Control: tags 1055253 + patch >Control: tags 1055253 + pending > >Dear maintainer, > >I've prepared an NMU for amanda (version

Bug#1040416: linux-image-6.1.0-9-amd64: Under heavy load Debian V12 and V11 causes data corruption on XFS filesystems.

2023-11-08 Thread Jose M Calhariz
Hi On Tue, Nov 07, 2023 at 08:33:58PM +0100, Diederik de Haas wrote: > Control: found -1 6.1~rc3-1~exp1 > Control: found -1 6.1.55-1 > > On Saturday, 4 November 2023 20:35:43 CET Jose M Calhariz wrote: > > > Ok. Please test (when you have time) 6.1.55-1. > > > >

Bug#1040416: linux-image-6.1.0-9-amd64: Under heavy load Debian V12 and V11 causes data corruption on XFS filesystems.

2023-11-08 Thread Jose M Calhariz
Hi On Tue, Nov 07, 2023 at 08:33:58PM +0100, Diederik de Haas wrote: > Control: found -1 6.1~rc3-1~exp1 > Control: found -1 6.1.55-1 > > On Saturday, 4 November 2023 20:35:43 CET Jose M Calhariz wrote: > > > Ok. Please test (when you have time) 6.1.55-1. > > > >

Bug#1040416: linux-image-6.1.0-9-amd64: Under heavy load Debian V12 and V11 causes data corruption on XFS filesystems.

2023-11-04 Thread Jose M Calhariz
Hi On Thu, Nov 02, 2023 at 07:40:38PM +0100, Diederik de Haas wrote: > > On Thursday, 2 November 2023 18:03:25 CET Jose M Calhariz wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 02, 2023 at 03:37:39PM +0100, Diederik de Haas wrote: > > > On Wednesday, 5 July 2023 19:07:15 CET Jose M Calhariz w

Bug#1040416: linux-image-6.1.0-9-amd64: Under heavy load Debian V12 and V11 causes data corruption on XFS filesystems.

2023-11-04 Thread Jose M Calhariz
Hi On Thu, Nov 02, 2023 at 07:40:38PM +0100, Diederik de Haas wrote: > > On Thursday, 2 November 2023 18:03:25 CET Jose M Calhariz wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 02, 2023 at 03:37:39PM +0100, Diederik de Haas wrote: > > > On Wednesday, 5 July 2023 19:07:15 CET Jose M Calhariz w

Bug#1032391: Under heavy load Debian V12 and V11 causes data corruption on XFS filesystems.

2023-11-02 Thread Jose M Calhariz
Hi, After some research it was found the problem was not HW related, but related with XFS driver and is present until linux 6.1. So I opened new bug report on https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1040416 Kind regards Jose M Calhariz -- -- A vida feliz, meu Deus, consiste

Bug#1040416: linux-image-6.1.0-9-amd64: Under heavy load Debian V12 and V11 causes data corruption on XFS filesystems.

2023-11-02 Thread Jose M Calhariz
On Thu, Nov 02, 2023 at 03:37:39PM +0100, Diederik de Haas wrote: > Control: tag -1 moreinfo > > On Wednesday, 5 July 2023 19:07:15 CET Jose M Calhariz wrote: > > Package: src:linux > > Version: 6.1.27-1 > > Can you try with the latest version in the 6.1.x series

Bug#1040416: linux-image-6.1.0-9-amd64: Under heavy load Debian V12 and V11 causes data corruption on XFS filesystems.

2023-11-02 Thread Jose M Calhariz
On Thu, Nov 02, 2023 at 03:37:39PM +0100, Diederik de Haas wrote: > Control: tag -1 moreinfo > > On Wednesday, 5 July 2023 19:07:15 CET Jose M Calhariz wrote: > > Package: src:linux > > Version: 6.1.27-1 > > Can you try with the latest version in the 6.1.x series

Bug#1032391: Under heavy load Debian V12 and V11 causes data corruption on XFS filesystems.

2023-11-02 Thread Jose M Calhariz
Hi, After some research it was found the problem was not HW related, but related with XFS driver and is present until linux 6.1. So I opened new bug report on https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1040416 Kind regards Jose M Calhariz -- -- A vida feliz, meu Deus, consiste

Bug#1034348: at: autopkgtest regression on arm64

2023-07-16 Thread Jose M Calhariz
Hi, I believe my last update fixed the problem can someone double check? Kind regards Jose M Calhariz On July 7, 2023 11:26:22 AM GMT+01:00, Jose M Calhariz wrote: >I too think it's a race condition. I made some changes to the test but the >upload to Debian did not went well. >

Bug#1034348: at: autopkgtest regression on arm64

2023-07-16 Thread Jose M Calhariz
Hi, I believe my last update fixed the problem can someone double check? Kind regards Jose M Calhariz On July 7, 2023 11:26:22 AM GMT+01:00, Jose M Calhariz wrote: >I too think it's a race condition. I made some changes to the test but the >upload to Debian did not went well. >

Bug#1034348: at: autopkgtest regression on arm64

2023-07-07 Thread Jose M Calhariz
I too think it's a race condition. I made some changes to the test but the upload to Debian did not went well. On July 6, 2023 2:12:59 PM GMT+01:00, Vincent Lefevre wrote: >On 2023-07-05 18:58:13 +0200, Johannes Christ wrote: >> Is there another way to reproduce this issue? > >I'm wondering wh

Bug#1034348: at: autopkgtest regression on arm64

2023-07-07 Thread Jose M Calhariz
I too think it's a race condition. I made some changes to the test but the upload to Debian did not went well. On July 6, 2023 2:12:59 PM GMT+01:00, Vincent Lefevre wrote: >On 2023-07-05 18:58:13 +0200, Johannes Christ wrote: >> Is there another way to reproduce this issue? > >I'm wondering wh

Howto debug the boot sequence and udev because bcache is not working after a reboot in Debian 12

2023-06-01 Thread Jose M Calhariz
with udev or bcache rules for it. How do I debug the boot sequence and the udev rules to understand what is wrong with my bcache in Debian 12? Kind regards Jose M Calhariz -- -- Não há médico para o medo. Provérbio Escocês signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#1033292: Subject:Re: Bug#1033292: unblock: amanda/1:3.5.1-11

2023-03-25 Thread Jose M Calhariz
. + * Bug fix: "backups fail with the following summary "FAILED [no +backup size line]"", thanks to Norman Lyon (Closes: #1032330). + * Bug fix: "Amanda is unusable", thanks to Kamil Jonca (Closes: +#1032884). + + -- Jose M Calhariz Tue, 21 Mar 2023 17:35:

Bug#1033292: Subject:Re: Bug#1033292: unblock: amanda/1:3.5.1-11

2023-03-25 Thread Jose M Calhariz
. + * Bug fix: "backups fail with the following summary "FAILED [no +backup size line]"", thanks to Norman Lyon (Closes: #1032330). + * Bug fix: "Amanda is unusable", thanks to Kamil Jonca (Closes: +#1032884). + + -- Jose M Calhariz Tue, 21 Mar 2023 17:35:

Bug#1033292: unblock: amanda/1:3.5.1-11

2023-03-21 Thread Jose M Calhariz
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock X-Debbugs-Cc: ama...@packages.debian.org, jose.calha...@tecnico.ulisboa.pt, calha...@debian.org, ns-l...@dsi.ist.utl.pt Control: affects -1 + src:amanda Please unblock package amanda [ Re

Bug#1033292: unblock: amanda/1:3.5.1-11

2023-03-21 Thread Jose M Calhariz
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock X-Debbugs-Cc: ama...@packages.debian.org, jose.calha...@tecnico.ulisboa.pt, calha...@debian.org, ns-l...@dsi.ist.utl.pt Control: affects -1 + src:amanda Please unblock package amanda [ Re

Bug#1032884: Acknowledgement (amanda-client: Amanda is unusable)

2023-03-15 Thread Jose M Calhariz
fix. Kind regards Jose M Calhariz

Bug#1032884: Acknowledgement (amanda-client: Amanda is unusable)

2023-03-15 Thread Jose M Calhariz
fix. Kind regards Jose M Calhariz

Bug#1032884: Acknowledgement (amanda-client: Amanda is unusable)

2023-03-15 Thread Jose M Calhariz
On 3/15/23 18:29, Kamil Jońca wrote: Jose M Calhariz writes: On 3/13/23 13:16, Kamil Jońca wrote: "Debian Bug Tracking System" writes: Thank you for filing a new Bug report with Debian. You can follow progress on this Bug here: 1032884: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrepo

Bug#1032884: Acknowledgement (amanda-client: Amanda is unusable)

2023-03-15 Thread Jose M Calhariz
On 3/15/23 18:29, Kamil Jońca wrote: Jose M Calhariz writes: On 3/13/23 13:16, Kamil Jońca wrote: "Debian Bug Tracking System" writes: Thank you for filing a new Bug report with Debian. You can follow progress on this Bug here: 1032884: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugrepo

Bug#1032330: amanda-client: backups fail with the following summary "FAILED [no backup size line]"

2023-03-04 Thread Jose M Calhariz
an amgtar for more information. Kind regards Jose M Calhariz On 3/4/23 06:17, Norman Lyon wrote: Package: amanda-client Version: 1:3.5.1-10 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, * What led up to the situation? upgrade of amanda-{client,common,server} from 1:3.5.1-9+b1 to 1:3.5.1-10 * What

Bug#1029829: Server connections refused after applying update?

2023-02-25 Thread Jose M Calhariz
Hi Barry, Can you please open a new bug report for this problem? Kind regards Jose M Calhariz On February 23, 2023 9:40:53 PM GMT+00:00, Barry Trent wrote: >I applied this update to my one remaining buster machine and now it is >refusing to connect to my bullseye-based amanda backup

Bug#1029829: Server connections refused after applying update?

2023-02-25 Thread Jose M Calhariz
Hi Barry, Can you please open a new bug report for this problem? Kind regards Jose M Calhariz On February 23, 2023 9:40:53 PM GMT+00:00, Barry Trent wrote: >I applied this update to my one remaining buster machine and now it is >refusing to connect to my bullseye-based amanda backup

Bug#1029829: amanda: CVE-2022-37704 CVE-2022-37705

2023-02-24 Thread Jose M Calhariz
Hi, just to tell that I am working on CVE-2022-37705, currently checking if the fix work on my workbench. Kind regards Jose M Calhariz On February 15, 2023 11:10:25 PM GMT+00:00, Amanda Trusted wrote: >Hi Jose, > >Here are the relevant bug fixes - >[0] CVE - http

Bug#1029829: amanda: CVE-2022-37704 CVE-2022-37705

2023-02-24 Thread Jose M Calhariz
Hi, just to tell that I am working on CVE-2022-37705, currently checking if the fix work on my workbench. Kind regards Jose M Calhariz On February 15, 2023 11:10:25 PM GMT+00:00, Amanda Trusted wrote: >Hi Jose, > >Here are the relevant bug fixes - >[0] CVE - http

Bug#1029829: amanda: CVE-2022-37704 CVE-2022-37705

2023-02-02 Thread Jose M Calhariz
Hi, This is my first security update, can I ask what is the procedure or where is documented? Kind regards Jose M Calhariz On January 28, 2023 12:59:09 PM GMT+00:00, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: >Source: amanda >Version: 1:3.5.1-9 >Severity: grave >Tags: security upstream &g

Bug#1029829: amanda: CVE-2022-37704 CVE-2022-37705

2023-02-02 Thread Jose M Calhariz
Hi, This is my first security update, can I ask what is the procedure or where is documented? Kind regards Jose M Calhariz On January 28, 2023 12:59:09 PM GMT+00:00, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: >Source: amanda >Version: 1:3.5.1-9 >Severity: grave >Tags: security upstream &g

Re: what leads to a "new disk" ?

2022-12-05 Thread Jose M Calhariz
On Mon, Dec 05, 2022 at 03:20:08PM +0100, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: > Am 05.12.22 um 15:03 schrieb Jose M Calhariz: > > On Thu, Dec 01, 2022 at 10:18:03AM +0100, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: > > > > > > I have an installation where I didn't add or remove DLEs f

Re: what leads to a "new disk" ?

2022-12-05 Thread Jose M Calhariz
v 0 FAILED [dumps too big, 42606931 KB, but cannot > incremental dump new disk] > > The DLE is NOT new. Where does that come from? > By chance have you made a "amadmin Config force samba.intra rootfs" just before that? Kind regards Jose M Calhariz -- -- O melhor n

Bug#1023755: logcheck-database: New default rsyslog high-precision timestamp breaks most rules

2022-12-05 Thread Jose M Calhariz
Hi, can someone do a minimal patch proposing a way to solve this issue? So we can discuss the best way to solve it, before doing the big work of solving it. I am going to check why this is out of my radar. Kind regards Jose M Calhariz On December 4, 2022 4:56:51 AM GMT+00:00, Mathias

Re: [OpenAFS] aklog: unknown RPC error (-1765328370) while getting AFS tickets

2022-09-20 Thread Jose M Calhariz
Jeff (if not to me ;-) > > Harald. > ___ > OpenAFS-info mailing list > OpenAFS-info@openafs.org > https://lists.openafs.org/mailman/listinfo/openafs-info > Kind regards Jose M Calhariz -- -- Estar compromissado e meio caminho andado para suces

Re: [OpenAFS] Zabbix monitoring AFS health

2022-09-20 Thread Jose M Calhariz
zabbix server? Kind regards Jose M Calhariz On Thu, Oct 07, 2021 at 09:56:28AM -0400, Tim Champ wrote: > Hello all. > > Just figured I'd check if anyone out there is using Zabbix to monitor their > AFS file servers, etc. If so, we're interested in seeing/hearing about it

Re: Multiple storage-definitions, generating archive tapes

2022-08-09 Thread Jose M Calhariz
0 My experience is this options do not work as documented. On my case there is a autoflush before the holding disk have enough files to fill a tape. On a setup that produces less files per amdump than the size of a physical tape. > autoflush yes > > (...) Kind regards Jose M Calhariz

Re: New Amanda Community release 3.5.2 Has Arrived!

2022-08-02 Thread Jose M Calhariz
On Tue, Aug 02, 2022 at 06:27:24AM +0100, Jose M Calhariz wrote: > On Mon, Aug 01, 2022 at 06:50:15PM +0100, Jose M Calhariz wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 01, 2022 at 10:55:40AM +0200, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: > > > Am 29.07.22 um 04:11 schrieb Pavan Raj: > > > > Hello Ev

Re: New Amanda Community release 3.5.2 Has Arrived!

2022-08-02 Thread Jose M Calhariz
; repositories seems a bit tricky: > > the new packages use the user "amandabackup", so far it was "backup" > > the path to amandad seems to change as well > > I assume I can edit packaging/deb/rules to adjust that. > > Unsure if that is a good thing t

Re: New Amanda Community release 3.5.2 Has Arrived!

2022-08-01 Thread Jose M Calhariz
On Mon, Aug 01, 2022 at 06:50:15PM +0100, Jose M Calhariz wrote: > On Mon, Aug 01, 2022 at 10:55:40AM +0200, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: > > Am 29.07.22 um 04:11 schrieb Pavan Raj: > > > Hello Everyone, > > > > > > We at Zmanda are pleased to announce the 3.5

Re: New Amanda Community release 3.5.2 Has Arrived!

2022-08-01 Thread Jose M Calhariz
ess with 3.5.2 before upload an official package to Debian unstable. > > On gentoo I am afraid I have to try to come up with an ebuild myself for now > (even the 3.6 beta doesn't come with an ebuild yet). > > > > Kind regards Jose M Calhariz -- -- O que

Re: amanda backup hanging consistently

2022-06-17 Thread Jose M Calhariz
Hi, If you run tar by hand on the DLE does it finish? After how much time? Kind regards Jose M Calhariz On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 09:50:11AM -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote: > On 6/15/22 09:38, Orion Poplawski wrote: > > Recently the backup of a particular DLE has started hanging consist

Re: "overdue" wrong

2022-06-02 Thread Jose M Calhariz
Hi I do not know about your case, but, in my case I get that when a full dump of a DLE fails. It will stay in that state of overdue until amanda gets a chance to do a full backup with success On Thu, Jun 02, 2022 at 10:04:16AM +0200, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: > > > I see wrong "overdue" info

Re: slow USB vtapes

2022-06-01 Thread Jose M Calhariz
ith amanda (3.6.0pre2, btw) the flushes and dumps are slow. > > Does changing some blocksize help with vtapes? > > Sure, old hardware, I know. > Hi, How many DLEs and how many run in parallel (inparallel parameter)? How fast is your holdingdisk? What "iostat -k -x 2" com

Re: debian 11, vtapes not found correctly anymore

2022-04-13 Thread Jose M Calhariz
On Wed, Apr 13, 2022 at 10:37:48AM +0200, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: > Am 13.04.22 um 09:56 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger: > > > > Am 12.04.22 um 17:57 schrieb Jose M Calhariz: > > > Hi, > > > > > > To tell that I have 1 instalation of amanda in Debian 1

Re: debian 11, vtapes not found correctly anymore

2022-04-12 Thread Jose M Calhariz
Hi, To tell that I have 1 instalation of amanda in Debian 11 with vtapes working flawless. Can we share the setup? Kind regards Jose M Calhariz On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 10:22:38AM +0200, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: > Am 05.04.22 um 14:39 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger: > > > >

Re: tape problem

2021-12-06 Thread Jose M Calhariz
compression on the tape? Kind regards Jose M Calhariz On Fri, Dec 03, 2021 at 11:18:08PM +, ghe2001 wrote: > amanda version: amadmin-3.5.1 > OS: Debian Linux, Buster > Host: Supermicro > PCI card: LSI Logic / Symbios Logic SAS2008 PCI-Express Fusion-MPT SAS-2 > [Falcon] (rev 0

Re: amandad paths

2021-11-17 Thread Jose M Calhariz
pe osx { client_username "amandabackup" } define dumptype upstream { amandad-path "/usr/libexec/amanda/amandad" client_username "amandabackup" } define dumptype source { amandad-path "/usr/local/libexec/amanda" client_username "amanda" }

Re: amvault to terteriary media

2021-09-10 Thread Jose M Calhariz
Hi, Have you tried? amlabel -f -otapetype="LTO2" -otpchanger="" -olabelstr="Vault-[1-7]" -ostorage=tape_storage vtl Vault-1 slot 1 Kind regards Jose M Calhariz On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 04:09:48AM -0400, Winston Sorfleet wrote: > Is there anyone here maki

Bug#981446: Possible adoption of logcheck

2021-09-03 Thread Jose M Calhariz
Hi, On Thu, Sep 02, 2021 at 09:55:36PM +0200, Hannes von Haugwitz wrote: > Hi Jose, > > On Mon, Aug 30, 2021 at 07:58:21PM +0100, Jose M Calhariz wrote: > > I am a user of logckeck as I use on all my machines that I sysadmin > > and I maintain some packages on Debian li

Bug#981446: Possible adoption of logcheck

2021-09-03 Thread Jose M Calhariz
Hi, On Thu, Sep 02, 2021 at 09:55:36PM +0200, Hannes von Haugwitz wrote: > Hi Jose, > > On Mon, Aug 30, 2021 at 07:58:21PM +0100, Jose M Calhariz wrote: > > I am a user of logckeck as I use on all my machines that I sysadmin > > and I maintain some packages on Debian li

Bug#981446: Possible adoption of logcheck

2021-08-30 Thread Jose M Calhariz
logcheck. Kind regards Jose M Calhariz -- -- Você faria papel de trouxa? A Betty Faria. signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#981446: Possible adoption of logcheck

2021-08-30 Thread Jose M Calhariz
logcheck. Kind regards Jose M Calhariz -- -- Você faria papel de trouxa? A Betty Faria. signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#985421: Adding DEP8 tests for at package

2021-08-28 Thread Jose M Calhariz
Hi, Now I have the repo full updated and I am preparing a new upstream release of at, with many changes and bug fixes.  Do you mind to do a MR at salsa? Kind regards Jose M Calhariz On 17/03/2021 20:57, Utkarsh Gupta wrote: > Source: at > Version: 3.1.23-1.1 > Severity: normal >

Re: amflush surprize auth=ssh.

2021-08-23 Thread Jose M Calhariz
Hi, What you describe is what I see when I do not use chunks. The last backup to the last vtape will be transfered again to vtape on next amdump or amflush. Kind regards Jose M Calhariz On Sun, Aug 22, 2021 at 02:40:52PM -0400, Jon LaBadie wrote: > I have one large DLE that gets broken i

Upload of amanda 3.5.1-8 to Debian with new documentation about auth=ssh.

2021-08-22 Thread Jose M Calhariz
unto 3.5.1 github repo. * I expect in a new upload to add the systemd units for auth=bsdtcp. I am not dropping the support for bsdtcp authentication, just making a little harder by not doing some automatic tasks on installation. Kind regards Jose M Calhariz -- -- A fama é boa até consegui

Re: Debian Buster, bsdtcp, systemd

2021-08-22 Thread Jose M Calhariz
On Sun, Aug 22, 2021 at 04:38:23PM +0200, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: > Am 21.08.21 um 19:45 schrieb Jose M Calhariz: > > > One note, On Debian every choice I make when packaging amanda or as a > > sysadmin is I expect for amanda to run as backup:backup. > > Thanks &g

Bug#972435: amanda: Please add support for TI RPC implementation

2021-08-22 Thread Jose M Calhariz
Hi, thank you for the patch, I am working to validate that everything works. Kind regards Jose M Calhariz On 21/08/2021 19:04, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > control: tag -1 + ftbfs > control: severity -1 serious > > On 2020-10-18 15:19, Aurelien Jarno wrote: >> Source: amanda >

Bug#972435: amanda: Please add support for TI RPC implementation

2021-08-22 Thread Jose M Calhariz
Hi, thank you for the patch, I am working to validate that everything works. Kind regards Jose M Calhariz On 21/08/2021 19:04, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > control: tag -1 + ftbfs > control: severity -1 serious > > On 2020-10-18 15:19, Aurelien Jarno wrote: >> Source: amanda >

"taperflush 100" or 200 not working as documented

2021-08-21 Thread Jose M Calhariz
ta and not when is around 50%. But for now I am playing with a toy installation of amanda and I am trying to understand the code in server-src/driver.c Kind regards Jose M Calhariz -- -- A imaginação sempre aumenta o mal que nos é oculto --Racine signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: Debian Buster, bsdtcp, systemd

2021-08-21 Thread Jose M Calhariz
kaging amanda or as a sysadmin is I expect for amanda to run as backup:backup. Kind regards Jose M Calhariz -- -- Pressione qualquer tecla... Não, não, NÃÃO!! QUALQUER UMA MENOS ESSA!!! signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Bug#992347: open-iscsi on upgrades fail to finish postinst script

2021-08-18 Thread Jose M Calhariz
On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 10:17:36PM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > On Wed, 2021-08-18 at 19:35 +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > > On Wed, 2021-08-18 at 13:32 +0100, Jose M Calhariz wrote: > > > I was expecting to be easy to collect the info in one or 2 files, but > >

Bug#992347: open-iscsi on upgrades fail to finish postinst script

2021-08-18 Thread Jose M Calhariz
On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 12:54:13PM +0100, Jose M Calhariz wrote: > On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 01:57:35PM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > > On Tue, 2021-08-17 at 19:02 +0100, Jose M Calhariz wrote: > > > > Did you change/tweak any of the default timeout values ? > > >

Bug#992347: open-iscsi on upgrades fail to finish postinst script

2021-08-18 Thread Jose M Calhariz
On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 01:57:35PM +0530, Ritesh Raj Sarraf wrote: > On Tue, 2021-08-17 at 19:02 +0100, Jose M Calhariz wrote: > > > Did you change/tweak any of the default timeout values ? > > > > > > > Most probably, it is not me that usually setup the iSCSI co

Bug#992347: open-iscsi on upgrades fail to finish postinst script

2021-08-17 Thread Jose M Calhariz
but I remember meeting you in Capetown. > > On Tue, 2021-08-17 at 16:27 +0100, Jose M Calhariz wrote: > > During upgrades of open-iscsi on my environment it fails to run > > postinst with success.  I got the following messages: > > > > Setting up open-iscsi (2.1.3-5)

Bug#992347: open-iscsi on upgrades fail to finish postinst script

2021-08-17 Thread Jose M Calhariz
-iscsi (--configure): installed open-iscsi package post-installation script subprocess returned error exit status 1 I have tried to change the postinst to wait for more time, for example 120s and it worked, after 40 seconds of wait. Kind regards Jose M Calhariz -- System Information: Debian Release

Re: Debian Buster, bsdtcp, systemd --- 10 GBit-NIC

2021-07-23 Thread Jose M Calhariz
; When I amdump a single DLE from another client, no compression, and watch > with "atop", I see /dev/sdb1 at 100% "load" ... with around 130 MB/s max, > decreasing write rate over time. > > The clients storage is able to deliver with around 300MB/s. > >

Re: Optional exclude list results in STRANGE report

2021-07-09 Thread Jose M Calhariz
Hi, I am using a .amanda-exclude.list per DLE on the top of it and is not broken for me. I can share my settings if it help. Kind regards Jose M Calhariz On Fri, Jul 09, 2021 at 05:13:19PM +, Debra S Baddorf wrote: > On the other hand: I also used .amanda-exclude-list > at the

Bug#990197: unblock: amanda/3.5.1-6

2021-06-22 Thread Jose M Calhariz
On 22/06/2021 22:15, Michael Biebl wrote: > Am 22.06.21 um 21:49 schrieb Jose M Calhariz: > >>> My first build was with MAILER only on config  and tested on a >>> bullseye >>> server. > > This appears to be correct/sufficient > >>> Then I was poi

Bug#990197: unblock: amanda/3.5.1-6

2021-06-22 Thread Jose M Calhariz
On 22/06/2021 22:15, Michael Biebl wrote: > Am 22.06.21 um 21:49 schrieb Jose M Calhariz: > >>> My first build was with MAILER only on config  and tested on a >>> bullseye >>> server. > > This appears to be correct/sufficient > >>> Then I was poi

Bug#990197: unblock: amanda/3.5.1-6

2021-06-22 Thread Jose M Calhariz
On 22/06/2021 18:08, Jose M Calhariz wrote: > On 22/06/2021 17:53, Michael Biebl wrote: >> Am 22.06.21 um 18:39 schrieb Jose M Calhariz: >>> On 22/06/2021 17:13, Michael Biebl wrote: >>>> Am 22.06.21 um 16:55 schrieb Jose M Calhariz: >>>>> +overrid

Bug#990197: unblock: amanda/3.5.1-6

2021-06-22 Thread Jose M Calhariz
On 22/06/2021 18:08, Jose M Calhariz wrote: > On 22/06/2021 17:53, Michael Biebl wrote: >> Am 22.06.21 um 18:39 schrieb Jose M Calhariz: >>> On 22/06/2021 17:13, Michael Biebl wrote: >>>> Am 22.06.21 um 16:55 schrieb Jose M Calhariz: >>>>> +overrid

Bug#990080: amanda-server: On a minimal installation there is no Mail command available to send email

2021-06-22 Thread Jose M Calhariz
-3.5.1/debian/rules 2021-06-22 13:10:01.0 +0100 @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ #!/usr/bin/make -f # Copyright 1998-2011 by Bdale Garbee. License GPL v2 -# 2016-2017 by Jose M Calhariz. License GPL v2 +# 2016-2021 by Jose M Calhariz. License GPL v2 export DH_VERBOSE=1 @@ -41,7

Bug#990197: unblock: amanda/3.5.1-6

2021-06-22 Thread Jose M Calhariz
On 22/06/2021 17:13, Michael Biebl wrote: > Am 22.06.21 um 16:55 schrieb Jose M Calhariz: >> +override_dh_auto_build: >> +    # MAILER: Fix for #296022, #475771 and #990080 >> +    MAILER="/usr/bin/mail" dh_auto_build > > Are you sure this bit is nec

Bug#990197: unblock: amanda/3.5.1-6

2021-06-22 Thread Jose M Calhariz
On 22/06/2021 17:13, Michael Biebl wrote: > Am 22.06.21 um 16:55 schrieb Jose M Calhariz: >> +override_dh_auto_build: >> +    # MAILER: Fix for #296022, #475771 and #990080 >> +    MAILER="/usr/bin/mail" dh_auto_build > > Are you sure this bit is nec

Bug#990197: unblock: amanda/3.5.1-6

2021-06-22 Thread Jose M Calhariz
/debian/rules 2021-06-22 13:10:01.0 +0100 @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ #!/usr/bin/make -f # Copyright 1998-2011 by Bdale Garbee. License GPL v2 -# 2016-2017 by Jose M Calhariz. License GPL v2 +# 2016-2021 by Jose M Calhariz. License GPL v2 export DH_VERBOSE=1 @@ -41,7 +41,12

Bug#990197: unblock: amanda/3.5.1-6

2021-06-22 Thread Jose M Calhariz
/debian/rules 2021-06-22 13:10:01.0 +0100 @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ #!/usr/bin/make -f # Copyright 1998-2011 by Bdale Garbee. License GPL v2 -# 2016-2017 by Jose M Calhariz. License GPL v2 +# 2016-2021 by Jose M Calhariz. License GPL v2 export DH_VERBOSE=1 @@ -41,7 +41,12

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >