On Fri, 20 Dec 2019 at 19:12, Simon Kelley wrote:
>
> On 19/12/2019 14:09, Derek Higgins wrote:
> > On Tue, 3 Dec 2019 at 18:36, Simon Kelley wrote:
> >>
> >>> The patch to fix this is trivial: change the save_counter() call to
> >>>
> >>&
On Tue, 3 Dec 2019 at 18:36, Simon Kelley wrote:
>
> > The patch to fix this is trivial: change the save_counter() call to
> >
> > save_counter(-1)
> >
> > I just checked, and this mistake only occurs here, and has been there
> > since forever.
> >
> > Good spot.
> >
> > Simon.
> >
>
> Patch commi
On Fri, 29 Nov 2019 at 17:23, Geert Stappers wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 03:55:17PM +, Derek Higgins wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
...
> >
> > I'm using dnsmasq-2.76-10.el7_7.1 on CentOS 7.7.1908 running in a container
>
> And what is at client side?
&g
Hi,
I've been trying to track down the reason for intermittent PXE
failures while using DHCPv6,
the failed PXE attempts seem to correlate with incomplete dhcp6
advertise packets.
e.g. in this sequence, the advertise packet length is 62 (all of the
failed attempts I've found happened with packets
On Wed, 31 Oct 2018 at 17:22, Alex Schultz wrote:
>
> Hey everyone,
>
> Based on previous emails around this[0][1], I have proposed a possible
> reducing in our usage by switching the scenario001--011 jobs to
> non-voting and removing them from the gate[2]. This will reduce the
> likelihood of cau
On Fri, 21 Sep 2018 at 11:16, Derek Higgins wrote:
> Just quick summary of the status and looking for some input about the
> experimental jobs
>
> 15 jobs are now done, with another 2 ready for reviewing. This leaves 6
> jobs
> 1 x multinode job
>I've yet to finis
Just quick summary of the status and looking for some input about the
experimental jobs
15 jobs are now done, with another 2 ready for reviewing. This leaves 6
jobs
1 x multinode job
I've yet to finished porting this one
2 x grenade jobs
Last time I looked grenade jobs couldn't yet be ported
On 23 February 2018 at 14:48, Derek Higgins wrote:
>
>
> On 1 February 2018 at 16:18, Emilien Macchi wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 8:05 AM, Derek Higgins wrote:
>> [...]
>>
>>> o Should I create a new tempest test for baremetal as some of
On 18 April 2018 at 17:12, Derek Higgins wrote:
>
>
> On 18 April 2018 at 14:22, Bogdan Dobrelya wrote:
>
>> On 4/18/18 12:07 PM, Derek Higgins wrote:
>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> I've been testing the ironic inspector containerised service
On 18 April 2018 at 14:22, Bogdan Dobrelya wrote:
> On 4/18/18 12:07 PM, Derek Higgins wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I've been testing the ironic inspector containerised service in the
>> overcloud, the service essentially works but there is a couple of hurdles
&
Hi All,
I've been testing the ironic inspector containerised service in the
overcloud, the service essentially works but there is a couple of hurdles
to tackle to set it up, the first of these is how to get the IPA kernel
and ramdisk where they need to be.
These need to be be present in the iron
On 1 February 2018 at 16:18, Emilien Macchi wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 8:05 AM, Derek Higgins wrote:
> [...]
>
>> o Should I create a new tempest test for baremetal as some of the
>>>> networking stuff is different?
>>>>
>>>
>>>
On 1 February 2018 at 15:36, Emilien Macchi wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 6:35 AM, Derek Higgins wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>I've been working on a set of patches as a WIP to test ironic in the
>> overcloud[1], the approach I've started with is to add
Hi All,
I've been working on a set of patches as a WIP to test ironic in the
overcloud[1], the approach I've started with is to add ironic into the
overcloud controller in scenario004. Also to run a script on the controller
(as a NodeExtraConfigPost) that sets up a VM with vbmc that can then be
On 19 December 2017 at 22:23, Brian Haley wrote:
> On 12/19/2017 04:00 PM, Ben Nemec wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 12/19/2017 02:43 PM, Brian Haley wrote:
>>
>>> On 12/19/2017 11:53 AM, Ben Nemec wrote:
>>>
The reboot is done (mostly...see below).
On 12/18/2017 05:11 PM, Joe Talerico wrote:
On 30 October 2017 at 15:16, Julia Kreger wrote:
...
>>> When I tried it I got this
>>> [ 370.704896] dracut-initqueue[387]: Warning: iscistart: Could not
>>> get list of targets from firmware.
>>>
>>> perhaps we could alter iscistart to not complain if there are no
>>> targets attached and just
On 25 October 2017 at 13:03, Dmitry Tantsur wrote:
> (ooops, I somehow missed this email. sorry!)
>
> Hi Yolanda,
>
> On 10/16/2017 11:06 AM, Yolanda Robla Mota wrote:
>>
>> Hi
>> Recently i've been helping some customers in the boot from ISCSI feature.
>> So far everything was working, but we had
On 19 July 2017 at 17:02, Derek Higgins wrote:
> On 17 July 2017 at 15:56, Derek Higgins wrote:
>> On 17 July 2017 at 15:37, Emilien Macchi wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 6:01 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 1:55 AM, Derek Higgins wrot
On 17 July 2017 at 15:56, Derek Higgins wrote:
> On 17 July 2017 at 15:37, Emilien Macchi wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 6:01 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 1:55 AM, Derek Higgins wrote:
>>>> On 12 July 2017 at 22:33, Emilien Macchi wro
On 17 July 2017 at 15:37, Emilien Macchi wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 6:01 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 1:55 AM, Derek Higgins wrote:
>>> On 12 July 2017 at 22:33, Emilien Macchi wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at
On 12 July 2017 at 22:33, Emilien Macchi wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 2:23 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
> [...]
>> Derek, it seems like you want to deploy Ironic on scenario006
>> (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/474802). I was wondering how it
>> would work with multinode jobs.
>
> Derek, I al
On 12 July 2017 at 22:23, Emilien Macchi wrote:
> Hey folks,
>
> Derek, it seems like you want to deploy Ironic on scenario006
> (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/474802). I was wondering how it
> would work with multinode jobs.
The idea was that we would create a libvirt domain on the overcloud
On 22 March 2017 at 22:36, Ben Nemec wrote:
> Hi all (owl?),
>
> You may have missed it in all the ci excitement the past couple of days, but
> we had a partial outage of rh1 last night. It turns out the OVS port issue
> Derek discussed in
> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2016
Public bug reported:
PUT /v2.0/ports/d38564ff-8a98-4a21-a162-9b2841c78ebc.json HTTP/1.1
...
{"port": {"mac_address": "fa:16:3e:d2:03:61"}}
This updates the ports MAC address but doesn't update the IP address.
If using slaac or stateless address mode it should as the IP address is derived
for th
On 28 February 2017 at 18:24, Simon Kelley wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
>
>
> On 28/02/17 17:10, Derek Higgins wrote:
>> On 28 February 2017 at 16:43, Simon Kelley
>> wrote: Could you post (or send to me) you
>> complete dnsmas
associate a particular VM
to a IP address.
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Simon.
>
>
> On 28/02/17 10:07, Derek Higgins wrote:
>> On 27 February 2017 at 21:51, Simon Kelley
>> wrote: I'm slightly confused as to the
>> problem here. The identity of a lease if defined by the
00-101--b,[fc00:101::b],set:ea1e2384-7ed7-4956-bae0-d653c86c840c
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Simon.
>
>
>
> On 27/02/17 16:04, Derek Higgins wrote:
>> I've recently been trying to use dnsmasq IPv6 to network boot,
>> after a number of hurdles the last probl
I've recently been trying to use dnsmasq IPv6 to network boot, after a
number of hurdles the last problem I've been having is that during the
boot process (after dnsmasq initially hands out an IP address as part
of PXE boot), it starts responding with "no addresses available".
The problem I'm hitt
Meant to close out this thread a while back, see below
On 27 January 2017 at 17:38, Tore Anderson wrote:
> * Derek Higgins
>
>> I've been trying lately to get iPXE to work over DHCPv6 with dsnmasq
>> and have had no luck, Is it possible to do this with dnsmasq and
>&g
On 27 January 2017 at 17:38, Tore Anderson wrote:
> * Derek Higgins
>
>> I've been trying lately to get iPXE to work over DHCPv6 with dsnmasq
>> and have had no luck, Is it possible to do this with dnsmasq and
>> DHCPv6 and if so are there any examples out
Hi All,
I've been trying lately to get iPXE to work over DHCPv6 with dsnmasq
and have had no luck, Is it possible to do this with dnsmasq and
DHCPv6 and if so are there any examples out there?
I've been trying
--dhcp-option="option6:bootfile-url,http://[1:2::3:4]:8088/boot.ipxe";
with a combina
On 16 December 2016 at 21:40, Ben Nemec wrote:
> Just a heads up for everyone, I've added some DB cleanup jobs to rh1 which
> will hopefully prevent the performance degradations over time that we've
> been seeing in that environment. Specifically, the crontab now looks like
> this:
>
> # Clean up
Public bug reported:
Using nova to boot UEFI instances in certain circumstances the nvram is
cleared
e.g. on a deployed node my nvram is set too boot from the grub installed
on the EFI partition
[root@t1 boot]# efibootmgr
Timeout: 0 seconds
BootOrder: 0004,0002,,0001,0003
Boot* EFI Flop
On 7 October 2016 at 14:03, Paul Belanger wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I wanted to propose a work item, that I am happy to spearhead, about setting
> up
> a 3rd party CI system for tripleo project. The work I am proposing, wouldn't
> actually affect anything today about tripleo-ci but provider a worki
On 9 September 2016 at 16:38, Paul Belanger wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I would like to start the discussions around the removal of the bastion host
> that sits in front of tripleo-test-cloud-rh1. It is my understanding, all
> traffic from tripleo-test-cloud-rh1 flows through this linux box. Obvious
Public bug reported:
Running "nova-manage archive_deleted_rows ..." clears out little or none
of the deleted nova instances
for example running the command several times
$ nova-manage --debug db archive_deleted_rows --max_rows 10
--verbose
I get
+--+-
On 25 August 2016 at 02:56, Paul Belanger wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 02:11:32PM -0400, James Slagle wrote:
>> The latest recurring problem that is failing a lot of the nonha ssl
>> jobs in tripleo-ci is:
>>
>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1616144
>> tripleo-ci: nonha jobs failing
On 24 August 2016 at 19:11, James Slagle wrote:
> The latest recurring problem that is failing a lot of the nonha ssl
> jobs in tripleo-ci is:
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/tripleo/+bug/1616144
> tripleo-ci: nonha jobs failing with Unable to establish connection to
> https://192.0.2.2:13004/v1/a9
On 19 August 2016 at 11:08, Giulio Fidente wrote:
> On 08/19/2016 11:41 AM, Derek Higgins wrote:
>>
>> On 19 August 2016 at 00:07, Sagi Shnaidman wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> we have a problem again with not enough memory in HA jobs, al
On 19 August 2016 at 00:07, Sagi Shnaidman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we have a problem again with not enough memory in HA jobs, all of them
> constantly fails in CI: http://status-tripleoci.rhcloud.com/
Have we any idea why we need more memory all of a sudden? For months
the overcloud nodes have had 5G of
On 27 July 2016 at 17:52, Paul Belanger wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 02:54:00PM +0100, Derek Higgins wrote:
>> On 21 July 2016 at 23:04, Paul Belanger wrote:
>> > Greetings,
>> >
>> > I write today to see how I can remove this server from
>> >
On 21 July 2016 at 23:04, Paul Belanger wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I write today to see how I can remove this server from
> tripleo-test-cloud-rh2. I
> have an open patch[1] currently to migrate tripleo-ci to use our AFS mirrors
> for
> centos and epel. However, I'm still struggling to see what el
Trying to catch up here and summarizing as a top post
so as I see it we have a number of problems that all need sorting out
Regardless of the branch being built, tripleo-ci is currently building
it with the packaging for master
- in most cases this has worked out ok because most projects don't
h
Hi All,
Yesterday the final patch merged to run CI jobs on RH2, and last
night we merged the patch to tripleo-ci to support RH2 jobs. So we now
have a new job (gate-tripleo-ci-centos-7-ovb-ha) running on all
tripleo patch reviews. This job is running pacemaker HA with a 3 node
controller and a
Hi All,
A while back we populated a etherpad[1] with details of our
individual development environments, the idea here was that we can
point newcomers to this page to give them an idea of what hard ware
its possible to deploy triple on and what tools we use drive it.
Its been just over 3 mo
On 13 June 2016 at 21:29, Ben Nemec wrote:
> So our documented repo setup steps are three curls, a sed, and a
> multi-line bash command. And the best part? That's not even what we
> test. The commands we actually use in tripleo.sh --repo-setup consist
> of the following: three curls, four seds,
On 19 May 2016 5:38 pm, "Paul Belanger" wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 03:50:15PM +0100, Derek Higgins wrote:
> > On 18 May 2016 at 13:34, Paul Belanger wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 12:22:55PM +0100, Derek Higgins wrote:
> > >> O
On 18 May 2016 at 13:34, Paul Belanger wrote:
> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 12:22:55PM +0100, Derek Higgins wrote:
>> On 6 May 2016 at 14:18, Paul Belanger wrote:
>> > On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 05:34:55PM +0100, Steven Hardy wrote:
>> >> Hi all,
>> >>
>&g
On 6 May 2016 at 14:18, Paul Belanger wrote:
> On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 05:34:55PM +0100, Steven Hardy wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Some folks have requested a summary of our summit sessions, as has been
>> provided for some other projects.
>>
>> I'll probably go into more detail on some of these topics
On 16 May 2016 at 18:16, Paul Belanger wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> Over the last few weeks I've been head deep into understanding the TripleO CI
> pipeline. For the most part, I am happy that we have merged centos-7 DIB
> support and I'm working to migrate the jobs to it.
>
> Something I have been tr
On 11 May 2016 at 10:24, Derek Higgins wrote:
> Hi All,
> I'll be taking down the tripleo cloud today for the hardware
> upgrade, The cloud will be take down at about 1PM UTC and I'll start
> bringing it back up once dcops have finished installing the new HW. We
> sh
On 6 May 2016 at 15:36, Derek Higgins wrote:
> Hi All,
>the long awaited RAM and SSD's have arrived for the tripleo rack,
> I'd like to schedule a time next week to do the install which will
> involve and outage window. We could attempt to do it node by node but
> the co
On 6 May 2016 at 15:57, Ben Nemec wrote:
> \o/
>
> On 05/06/2016 09:36 AM, Derek Higgins wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>the long awaited RAM and SSD's have arrived for the tripleo rack,
>> I'd like to schedule a time next week to do the install which will
>>
On 6 May 2016 at 17:50, James Slagle wrote:
> On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 10:36 AM, Derek Higgins wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>the long awaited RAM and SSD's have arrived for the tripleo rack,
>> I'd like to schedule a time next week to do the install which will
>>
Hi All,
the long awaited RAM and SSD's have arrived for the tripleo rack,
I'd like to schedule a time next week to do the install which will
involve and outage window. We could attempt to do it node by node but
the controller needs to come down at some stage anyways and doing
other nodes groups
tripleo has move to ironic
Closing this bug, please feel free to reopen it if you disagree.
** Changed in: tripleo
Status: Triaged => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Yahoo!
Engineering Team, which is subscribed to OpenStack Compute (nova).
ht
On 13 April 2016 at 09:58, Steven Hardy wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 11:08:28PM +0200, Gabriele Cerami wrote:
>> On Fri, 2016-04-08 at 16:18 +0100, Steven Hardy wrote:
>>
>> > Note we're not using devtest at all anymore, the developer script
>> > many
>> > folks use is tripleo.sh:
>>
>> So, I
On 7 April 2016 at 22:03, Gabriele Cerami wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to find an entry point to join the effort in TripleO CI.
Hi Gabriele, welcome aboard
> I studied the infrastructure and the scripts, but there's still something I'm
> missing.
> The last step of studying the complex landscape
On 17 March 2016 at 16:59, Ben Nemec wrote:
> On 03/10/2016 05:24 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
>> On 2016-03-10 16:09:44 -0500 (-0500), Dan Prince wrote:
>>> This seems to be the week people want to pile it on TripleO. Talking
>>> about upstream is great but I suppose I'd rather debate major changes
On 20 March 2016 at 18:32, Dan Prince wrote:
> I'd like to propose that we add John Trowbridge to the TripleO core
> review team. John has become one of the goto guys in helping to chase
> down upstream trunk chasing issues. He has contributed a lot to helping
> keep general CI issues running and
On 20 March 2016 at 18:22, Dan Prince wrote:
> I'd like to propose that we add Emilien Macchi to the TripleO core
> review team. Emilien has been getting more involved with TripleO during
> this last release. In addition to help with various Puppet things he
> also has experience in building OpenS
On 16 March 2016 at 02:41, Emilien Macchi wrote:
> I did some testing again and I'm still running in curl issues:
> http://paste.openstack.org/show/BU7UY0mUrxoMUGDhXgWs/
>
> I'll continue investigation tomorrow.
btw, tripleo-ci seems to be doing reasonably well this morning, I
don't see any failu
On 14 March 2016 at 14:26, Dan Prince wrote:
> Looking at the stats for the last 180 days I'd like to propose we
> cleanup TripleO core a bit:
>
> http://russellbryant.net/openstack-stats/tripleo-reviewers-180.txt
>
> There are a few reviewers with low numbers of reviews (just added to
> the tripl
On 14 March 2016 at 14:38, Dan Prince wrote:
> http://russellbryant.net/openstack-stats/tripleo-reviewers-180.txt
>
> Our top reviewer over the last half a year ejuaso (goes by Ozz for
> Osorio or jaosorior on IRC). His reviews seem consistent, he
> consistently attends the meetings and he chimes
On 9 March 2016 at 07:08, Richard Su wrote:
>
>
> On 03/08/2016 09:58 AM, Derek Higgins wrote:
>>
>> On 7 March 2016 at 18:22, Ben Nemec wrote:
>>>
>>> On 03/07/2016 11:33 AM, Derek Higgins wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 7 March 2016 at 15
On 7 March 2016 at 18:22, Ben Nemec wrote:
> On 03/07/2016 11:33 AM, Derek Higgins wrote:
>> On 7 March 2016 at 15:24, Derek Higgins wrote:
>>> On 6 March 2016 at 16:58, James Slagle wrote:
>>>> On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 11:15 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
>>>&g
On 7 March 2016 at 12:11, John Trowbridge wrote:
>
>
> On 03/06/2016 11:58 AM, James Slagle wrote:
>> On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 11:15 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
>>> I'm kind of hijacking Dan's e-mail but I would like to propose some
>>> technical improvements to stop having so much CI failures.
>>>
>
On 7 March 2016 at 15:24, Derek Higgins wrote:
> On 6 March 2016 at 16:58, James Slagle wrote:
>> On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 11:15 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
>>> I'm kind of hijacking Dan's e-mail but I would like to propose some
>>> technical improvemen
On 6 March 2016 at 16:58, James Slagle wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 11:15 AM, Emilien Macchi wrote:
>> I'm kind of hijacking Dan's e-mail but I would like to propose some
>> technical improvements to stop having so much CI failures.
>>
>>
>> 1/ Stop creating swap files. We don't have SSD, this
On 10/02/16 18:05, James Slagle wrote:
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 4:57 PM, Steven Hardy mailto:sha...@redhat.com>> wrote:
Hi all,
We discussed this in our meeting[1] this week, and agreed a ML
discussion
to gain consensus and give folks visibility of the outcome would be
a
Hi All,
We briefly discussed feature tracking in this weeks tripleo meeting. I
would like to provide a way for downstream consumers (and ourselves) to
track new features as they get implemented. The main things that came
out of the discussion is that people liked the spec-lite process that
th
Hi All,
For the last few months we've been alerting the #tripleo irc channel
when a card is open on the tripleo trello org, in the urgent list.
When used I think it served a good purpose to alert people to the fact
that deploying master is currently broken, but it hasn't been used as
much as
PM, Zane Bitter
wrote:
>
>Â Â Â On 30/11/15 12:51, Ruby Loo wrote:
>
>Â Â Â Â On 30 November 2015 at 10:19, Derek Higgins
    <mailto:der...@redhat.com>> wrote:
>
>Â Â Â Â Ã*Â Ã*Â Hi All,
>
On 30/11/15 22:18, Steven Hardy wrote:
On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 12:51:53PM -0500, Ruby Loo wrote:
On 30 November 2015 at 10:19, Derek Higgins wrote:
Hi All,
  A few months tripleo switch from its devtest based CI to one that
was based on instack. Before doing this
On 30/11/15 17:03, Dmitry Tantsur wrote:
On 11/30/2015 04:19 PM, Derek Higgins wrote:
Hi All,
A few months tripleo switch from its devtest based CI to one that
was based on instack. Before doing this we anticipated disruption in the
ci jobs and removed them from non tripleo projects
On 30/11/15 14:56, Derek Higgins wrote:
Hi all,
I've been asking about this on irc but given the holidays last week
the problem is still persisting, now since freenode unavailable maybe
an email might be better.
tripleo ci jobs havn't run sense Thursday morning about (070
Hi All,
A few months tripleo switch from its devtest based CI to one that
was based on instack. Before doing this we anticipated disruption in the
ci jobs and removed them from non tripleo projects.
We'd like to investigate adding it back to heat and ironic as these
are the two proje
Hi all,
I've been asking about this on irc but given the holidays last week
the problem is still persisting, now since freenode unavailable maybe
an email might be better.
tripleo ci jobs havn't run sense Thursday morning about (0700 UTC), it
looks to me like nodepool is constantly spin
headers=headers, params=params)
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/neutronclient/v2_0/client.py", line
211, in do_request
self._handle_fault_response(status_code, replybody)
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/neutronclient/v2_0/client.py", line
185, in _handle_f
On 03/11/15 15:25, Gregory Haynes wrote:
Hello everyone,
I would like to propose adding Ian Wienand as a core reviewer on the
diskimage-builder project. Ian has been making a significant number of
contributions for some time to the project, and has been a great help in
reviews lately. Thus, I
On 25/09/15 13:34, Dan Prince wrote:
It has come to my attention that we aren't making great use of our
tripleo.org domain. One thing that would be useful would be to have the
new tripleo-docs content displayed there. It would also be nice to have
quick links to some of our useful resources, pe
On 15/09/15 12:38, Derek Higgins wrote:
On 10/09/15 15:12, Derek Higgins wrote:
Hi All,
The current meeting slot for TripleO is every second Tuesday @ 1900 UTC,
since that time slot was chosen a lot of people have joined the team and
others have moved on, I like to revisit the timeslot to
On 10/09/15 15:12, Derek Higgins wrote:
Hi All,
The current meeting slot for TripleO is every second Tuesday @ 1900 UTC,
since that time slot was chosen a lot of people have joined the team and
others have moved on, I like to revisit the timeslot to see if we can
accommodate more people at the
On 10/09/15 15:06, James Slagle wrote:
TripleO has added a few new repositories, one of which is
python-tripleoclient[1], the former python-rdomanager-oscplugin.
With the additional repositories, there is an additional review burden
on our core reviewers. There is also the fact that folks who
Hi All,
The current meeting slot for TripleO is every second Tuesday @ 1900 UTC,
since that time slot was chosen a lot of people have joined the team and
others have moved on, I like to revisit the timeslot to see if we can
accommodate more people at the meeting (myself included).
Sticking w
On 09/09/15 18:03, Jason Rist wrote:
On 09/09/2015 07:09 AM, Derek Higgins wrote:
On 08/09/15 16:36, Derek Higgins wrote:
Hi All,
Some of ye may remember some time ago we used to organize TripleO
based jobs/tasks on a trello board[1], at some stage this board fell out
of use (the
On 08/09/15 16:36, Derek Higgins wrote:
Hi All,
Some of ye may remember some time ago we used to organize TripleO
based jobs/tasks on a trello board[1], at some stage this board fell out
of use (the exact reason I can't put my finger on). This morning I was
putting a list of t
Hi All,
Some of ye may remember some time ago we used to organize TripleO
based jobs/tasks on a trello board[1], at some stage this board fell out
of use (the exact reason I can't put my finger on). This morning I was
putting a list of things together that need to be done in the area of CI
On 03/09/15 07:34, Derek Higgins wrote:
Hi All,
The patch to reshuffle our CI jobs has merged[1], along with the patch
to switch the f21-noha job to be instack based[2] (with centos images).
So the current status is that our CI has been removed from most of the
non tripleo projects (with the
Hi All,
The patch to reshuffle our CI jobs has merged[1], along with the patch
to switch the f21-noha job to be instack based[2] (with centos images).
So the current status is that our CI has been removed from most of the
non tripleo projects (with the exception of nova/neutron/heat and ironi
08/19/2015 12:22 PM, Dougal Matthews wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Dmitry Tantsur"
To: openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org
Sent: Wednesday, 19 August, 2015 5:57:36 PM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Moving instack upstream
On 08/19/2015 06:42 PM, Derek Higgins wro
rds)
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/205479/
3. pull in 3 repositories upstream
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/215186/
There will be follow up patches after these but this will get the ball
rolling
thanks,
Derek.
On 23/07/15 07:40, Derek Higgins wrote:
See below
On 21/07/15 20:29, Derek Higgins wrot
On 06/08/15 15:01, Dougal Matthews wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Dan Prince"
To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
Sent: Thursday, 6 August, 2015 1:12:42 PM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Moving instack upstream
I would really like to see
On 24/07/15 00:56, James Slagle wrote:
On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 2:40 AM, Derek Higgins wrote:
See below
On 21/07/15 20:29, Derek Higgins wrote:
Hi All,
Something we discussed at the summit was to switch the focus of
tripleo's deployment method to deploy using instack using i
See below
On 21/07/15 20:29, Derek Higgins wrote:
Hi All,
Something we discussed at the summit was to switch the focus of
tripleo's deployment method to deploy using instack using images built
with tripleo-puppet-elements. Up to now all the instack work has been
done downstream of tr
On 22/07/15 18:41, Gregory Haynes wrote:
Excerpts from Derek Higgins's message of 2015-07-21 19:29:49 +:
Hi All,
Something we discussed at the summit was to switch the focus of
tripleo's deployment method to deploy using instack using images built
with tripleo-puppet-elements. Up to now
Hi All,
Something we discussed at the summit was to switch the focus of
tripleo's deployment method to deploy using instack using images built
with tripleo-puppet-elements. Up to now all the instack work has been
done downstream of tripleo as part of rdo. Having parts of our
deployment stor
On 09/06/15 10:37, Dirk Müller wrote:
Hi Derek,
2015-06-09 0:34 GMT+02:00 Derek Higgins :
This patch would result in 80 packaging repositories being pulled into
gerrit.
I personally would prefer to start with fewer but common packages
between all RPM distros (is there more than Red Hat
On 03/06/15 17:28, Haïkel wrote:
2015-06-03 17:23 GMT+02:00 Thomas Goirand :
i
On 06/03/2015 12:41 AM, James E. Blair wrote:
Hi,
This came up at the TC meeting today, and I volunteered to provide an
update from the discussion.
I've just read the IRC logs. And there's one thing I would like
On 02/06/15 23:41, James E. Blair wrote:
Hi,
This came up at the TC meeting today, and I volunteered to provide an
update from the discussion.
In general, I think there is a lot of support for a packaging effort in
OpenStack. The discussion here has been great; we need to answer a few
questi
1 - 100 of 224 matches
Mail list logo
