[Bug 2100963] Re: cloud-init fails with MAAS since Feb 4 update

2025-04-09 Thread Alan Baghumian
@Rrizun If you are using bonds, this is the issue: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2106671 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2100963 Title: cloud-init fails with MAAS since Feb 4 update

[Bug 2100963] Re: cloud-init fails with MAAS since Feb 4 update

2025-04-08 Thread Alan Baghumian
My pleasure @Rrizun In your deployments, do you happen to use OpenVSwitch bridges with your deployments? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2100963 Title: cloud-init fails with MAAS since

[Bug 2100963] Re: cloud-init fails with MAAS since Feb 4 update

2025-04-04 Thread Alan Baghumian
For the time being until we figure out what is going on you can override / downgrade cloud-init during deployments using the following preseed file: #cloud-config debconf_selections: maas: | {{for line in str(curtin_preseed).splitlines()}} {{line}} {{endfor}} late_commands: maas: [wget, '

[Bug 2100963] Re: cloud-init fails with MAAS since Feb 4 update

2025-03-18 Thread Alan Baghumian
@James I'm testing that as we speak - I'll report back shortly -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2100963 Title: cloud-init fails with MAAS since Feb 4 update To manage notifications abo

[Bug 2100963] Re: cloud-init fails with MAAS since Feb 4 update

2025-03-18 Thread Alan Baghumian
My Noble Results are in (Snippet from the build process): cloudimg.image.qemu.cloudimg: Preparing to unpack .../cloud-init_24.4.1-0ubuntu0~24.04.2_all.deb ... cloudimg.image.qemu.cloudimg: Unpacking cloud-init (24.4.1-0ubuntu0~24.04.2) over (24.4.1-0ubuntu0~24.04.1) ... cloudimg.image.qemu.cloud

[Bug 2100963] Re: cloud-init fails with MAAS since Feb 4 update

2025-03-18 Thread Alan Baghumian
OK! Third time's a charm! Built a new image (Note the snippet from build): cloudimg.image.qemu.cloudimg: Preparing to unpack .../cloud-init_24.4.1-0ubuntu0~20.04.2_all.deb ... cloudimg.image.qemu.cloudimg: Unpacking cloud-init (24.4.1-0ubuntu0~20.04.2) over (24.4.1-0ubuntu0~20.04.1) ... cloudim

[Bug 2100963] Re: cloud-init fails with MAAS since Feb 4 update

2025-03-16 Thread Alan Baghumian
You are right! The .2 deb is missing: [ ] cloud-init_24.4.1-0ubuntu0~20.04.1.debian.tar.xz2025-02-17 19:23103K [TXT] cloud-init_24.4.1-0ubuntu0~20.04.1.dsc 2025-02-17 19:232.1K [ ] cloud-init_24.4.1-0ubuntu0~20.04.1_all.deb 2025-02-17 19:25 556K [

[Bug 2100963] Re: cloud-init fails with MAAS since Feb 4 update

2025-03-15 Thread Alan Baghumian
I spoke too soon about Focal. It seems like the patch does not contain a full fix. Even though the deployment is successful, you can not SSH to the machine and the host name also does not correctly set. I reverted the tag and attaching the cloud-init logs as well as the journals. Please let me k

[Bug 2100963] Re: cloud-init fails with MAAS since Feb 4 update

2025-03-15 Thread Alan Baghumian
Deployment Screenshot ** Attachment added: "Screenshot from 2025-03-15 20-26-37.png" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/2100963/+attachment/5865063/+files/Screenshot%20from%202025-03-15%2020-26-37.png ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-focal ** Tag

[Bug 2100963] Re: cloud-init fails with MAAS since Feb 4 update

2025-03-15 Thread Alan Baghumian
Hello @Timo, I went ahead and built a Custom MAAS image using Focal (packer- maas/ubuntu). This build was modified to pull the new cloud-init package from focal-proposed: ==> cloudimg.image.qemu.cloudimg: + apt-get install -y --allow-downgrades cloud-init=24.4.1-0ubuntu0~20.04.1 grub-efi-amd64-b

[Bug 2100963] Re: cloud-init fails with MAAS since Feb 4 update

2025-03-15 Thread Alan Baghumian
Focal Tag has been updated to verification-done-focal -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2100963 Title: cloud-init fails with MAAS since Feb 4 update To manage notifications about this b

[Bug 2100963] Re: cloud-init fails with MAAS since Feb 4 update

2025-03-15 Thread Alan Baghumian
Hello @Timo! Thank you so much for the quick turnaround on this issue. I also tested building a fresh Jammy image with the new package and it deploys fine w/o any issues now. Output snippet from the build log: cloudimg.image.qemu.cloudimg: Get:1 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy-proposed/m

[Bug 2100963] Re: cloud-init fails with MAAS since Feb 4 update

2025-03-10 Thread Alan Baghumian
I hit this exact same issue while building and deploying Ubuntu images using packer-maas. The solution as suggested above was to use the older version of cloud- init during the image build process: apt-get install -y --allow-downgrades cloud-init=23.1.2-0ubuntu0~22.04.1 This is concerning, as I

[Yahoo-eng-team] [Bug 2095038] [NEW] delete_on_termination=true fails to clean-up volumes in certain scenarios

2025-01-15 Thread Alan Baghumian
Public bug reported: Hello OpenStack Team! We came across in interesting issue affecting the post deletion cleanup of volume backed instances on Charmed OpenStack Jammy/Yoga. After spending some time investigating, I am able to reproduce this on my own cloud. The general workflow is: 1. Create

[Curtin-dev] [Merge] ~alanbach/curtin:hacking-doc-update into curtin:master

2024-12-12 Thread Alan Baghumian
Alan Baghumian has proposed merging ~alanbach/curtin:hacking-doc-update into curtin:master. Commit message: Updated HACKING.rst to include the build/test dependency script. Requested reviews: Server Team CI bot (server-team-bot): continuous-integration curtin developers (curtin-dev) For

[Curtin-dev] [Merge] ~alanbach/curtin:lp1979280 into curtin:master

2024-12-10 Thread Alan Baghumian
Alan Baghumian has proposed merging ~alanbach/curtin:lp1979280 into curtin:master. Commit message: Add support for RHEL 10 family. LP: #1979280 Requested reviews: curtin developers (curtin-dev) Related bugs: Bug #1979280 in curtin: "Deploying Alma linux 9 - unsupported RHEL ve

[Bug 2077382] Re: [SRU] support additional parametes on deploy()

2024-12-10 Thread Alan Baghumian
** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-jammy verification-needed-noble verification-needed-oracular ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-jammy verification-done-noble verification-done-oracular -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubu

[Curtin-dev] [Merge] ~alanbach/curtin:lp2090874 into curtin:master

2024-12-10 Thread Alan Baghumian
Alan Baghumian has proposed merging ~alanbach/curtin:lp2090874 into curtin:master. Commit message: Add support for arm64 bootloader artifact detection support for rpm based distributions. LP: #2090874 Requested reviews: curtin developers (curtin-dev) Related bugs: Bug #2090874 in

[Bug 2077382] Re: [SRU] support additional parametes on deploy()

2024-12-10 Thread Alan Baghumian
** Attachment added: "Noble Verification Screenshot - SSH" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-libmaas/+bug/2077382/+attachment/5843437/+files/lp2077382-noble-verification-cli.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed t

[Bug 2077382] Re: [SRU] support additional parametes on deploy()

2024-12-10 Thread Alan Baghumian
** Attachment added: "Jammy Verification Screenshot - SSH" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-libmaas/+bug/2077382/+attachment/5843436/+files/lp2077382-jammy-verification-cli.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed t

[Bug 2077382] Re: [SRU] support additional parametes on deploy()

2024-12-10 Thread Alan Baghumian
** Attachment added: "Oracular Verification Screenshot - SSH" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-libmaas/+bug/2077382/+attachment/5843438/+files/lp2077382-oracular-verification-cli.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscr

[Bug 2077382] Re: [SRU] support additional parametes on deploy()

2024-12-10 Thread Alan Baghumian
Hi Mauricio, as discussed, also adding the verification screenshots taken from SSH as described in the original test plan. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2077382 Title: [SRU] support

[Bug 2077382] Re: [SRU] support additional parametes on deploy()

2024-12-09 Thread Alan Baghumian
** Attachment added: "Jammy Verification Screenshot - MAAS UI" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-libmaas/+bug/2077382/+attachment/5843174/+files/lp2077382-jammy-verification-maas-ui.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subs

[Bug 2077382] Re: [SRU] support additional parametes on deploy()

2024-12-09 Thread Alan Baghumian
Hello @Mauricio! Sure thing. I just did a manual verification following these steps: 1) Used the script to deploy machines using python3-libmass in mod-new 2) Prevented the script from releasing them to validate and take a screen shot from the MAAS UI Adding the screenshots. -- You received th

[Bug 2077382] Re: [SRU] support additional parametes on deploy()

2024-12-09 Thread Alan Baghumian
** Attachment added: "Oracular Verification Screenshot - MAAS UI" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-libmaas/+bug/2077382/+attachment/5843176/+files/lp2077382-oracular-verification-maas-ui.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which i

[Bug 2077382] Re: [SRU] support additional parametes on deploy()

2024-12-09 Thread Alan Baghumian
** Attachment added: "Noble Verification Screenshot - MAAS UI" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-libmaas/+bug/2077382/+attachment/5843175/+files/lp2077382-noble-verification-maas-ui.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subs

[Bug 2077382] Re: [SRU] support additional parametes on deploy()

2024-12-09 Thread Alan Baghumian
** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-jammy verification-needed-noble verification-needed-oracular ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-jammy verification-done-noble verification-done-oracular -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubu

[Bug 2077382] Re: [SRU] support additional parametes on deploy()

2024-12-06 Thread Alan Baghumian
And the last one! Oraculat verification has been also completed successfully. ** Attachment added: "Oracular Verification Screenshot" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/noble/+source/python-libmaas/+bug/2077382/+attachment/5842633/+files/lp2077382-oracular-verification.png -- You received th

[Bug 2077382] Re: [SRU] support additional parametes on deploy()

2024-12-06 Thread Alan Baghumian
Hello Again @Timo Noble verification has been also completed successfully. ** Attachment added: "Noble verification Screenshot" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/noble/+source/python-libmaas/+bug/2077382/+attachment/5842632/+files/lp2077382-noble-verification.png -- You received this bug no

[Bug 2077382] Re: [SRU] support additional parametes on deploy()

2024-12-06 Thread Alan Baghumian
Hello @Timo I modified the verification python script attached above after enabling jammy-proposed and completed the verification for Jammy. def install_python_libmaas_modified(): print_colored("Installing Modified version of python3-libmaas=0.6.8-0ubuntu0.22.04.2", "yellow") subprocess.

[Bug 2077382] Re: [SRU] support additional parametes on deploy()

2024-10-25 Thread Alan Baghumian
Debdiff for Plucky ** Patch added: "Debdiff for Plucky" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-libmaas/+bug/2077382/+attachment/5831503/+files/lp2077382-python3-libmaas-plucky.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 2077382] Re: [SRU] support additional parametes on deploy()

2024-10-25 Thread Alan Baghumian
Refreshed debdiff for Jammy ** Patch added: "Refreshed debdiff for Jammy" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-libmaas/+bug/2077382/+attachment/5831500/+files/lp2077382-python3-libmaas-jammy.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, wh

[Bug 2077382] Re: [SRU] support additional parametes on deploy()

2024-10-24 Thread Alan Baghumian
^^ I removed the patch flag from debdiffs to satisfy this. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2077382 Title: [SRU] support additional parametes on deploy() To manage notifications about

[Bug 2077382] Re: [SRU] support additional parametes on deploy()

2024-10-24 Thread Alan Baghumian
Debdiff for Oracular ** Patch added: "Debdiff for Oracular" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-libmaas/+bug/2077382/+attachment/5831502/+files/lp2077382-python3-libmaas-oracular.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subs

[Bug 2077382] Re: [SRU] support additional parametes on deploy()

2024-10-24 Thread Alan Baghumian
Debdiff for Noble ** Patch added: "Debdiff for Noble" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-libmaas/+bug/2077382/+attachment/5831501/+files/lp2077382-python3-libmaas-noble.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 2077382] Re: [SRU] support additional parametes on deploy()

2024-09-25 Thread Alan Baghumian
Just a quick update, our client completed the PPA testing process on their end. They were able to use the PPA packages to perform deployments using the newly added parameters. Best, Alan -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu

[Bug 2077382] Re: [SRU] support additional parametes on deploy()

2024-09-25 Thread Alan Baghumian
Please make sure to update the following variables before using: maas_endpoint = "/MAAS/api/2.0/" maas_apikey = "" test_system_id = "" ** Attachment removed: "SRU Automated Test Script" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-libmaas/+bug/2077382/+attachment/5821222/+files/maas-pytho

[Bug 2077382] Re: [SRU] support additional parametes on deploy()

2024-09-23 Thread Alan Baghumian
Attaching an automated deployment test script. Please update the following variables before using: maas_endpoint = "/MAAS/api/2.0/" maas_apikey = "" test_system_id = "" ** Attachment added: "SRU Automated Test Script" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-libmaas/+bug/2077382/+att

[Bug 2077382] Re: [SRU] support additional parametes on deploy()

2024-09-23 Thread Alan Baghumian
** Description changed: [ Impact ] * This SRU is not addressing an existing problem but adds support for two additional optional parameters being ephemeral_deploy and enable_hw_sync on deploy(). For more details please see (1). + + + [ Test Plan ] + + * Pre-Requisits: A MAAS controll

[Bug 1999814] Re: [SRU] Allow for specifying common baseline CPU model with disabled feature

2024-09-20 Thread Alan Baghumian
Hello @James I just tested the Focal Proposed packages on my Sapphire Rapids Compute Node: $ juju config nova-compute-focal cpu-mode custom $ juju config nova-compute-focal cpu-model Cascadelake-Server-noTSX $ juju config nova-compute-focal cpu-model-extra-flags -mpx Before Upgrade: ubuntu@no

[Bug 2077382] Re: [SRU] support additional parametes on deploy()

2024-08-23 Thread Alan Baghumian
** Patch added: "Jammy Debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python-libmaas/+bug/2077382/+attachment/5808702/+files/lp2077382-python3-libmaas-jammy.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.l

[Bug 2077382] Re: [SRU] support additional parametes on deploy()

2024-08-23 Thread Alan Baghumian
** Description changed: - This is a SRU bug report for this feature that has already been merged - upstream (1). + [Impact] - This implements support for ephemeral_deploy as well as enable_hw_sync - on deploy(). + * This SRU is not addressing an existing problem but adds support for + two addit

[Bug 2077382] Re: [SRU] support additional parametes on deploy()

2024-08-23 Thread Alan Baghumian
** Also affects: python-libmaas (Ubuntu Jammy) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: python-libmaas (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: python-libmaas (Ubuntu Oracular) Importance: High Assignee: Alan Baghumian (alanbach

[Bug 2077382] [NEW] [SRU] support additional parametes on deploy()

2024-08-19 Thread Alan Baghumian
) Importance: High Assignee: Alan Baghumian (alanbach) Status: In Progress ** Changed in: python-libmaas (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Alan Baghumian (alanbach) ** Changed in: python-libmaas (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: python-libmaas (

[Bug 2013390] Re: CPU Lockup related to xhci/DMA

2024-07-04 Thread Alan Baghumian
I am experiencing a very similar issue on a new AMD Ryzen 7 machine running Jammy + 6.5 HWE kernel, when USB Ethernet adapter is under heavy load: Jul 4 13:09:21 kvm-09 kernel: [ 2383.690610] [ cut here ] Jul 4 13:09:21 kvm-09 kernel: [ 2383.690615] NETDEV WATCHDOG: enxe

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 2062177] Re: Remmina crashes after RDP connection

2024-04-26 Thread Alan Baghumian
I just rebuilt and installed fresh packages on Noble using the supplied patch above and all good now! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to remmina in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2062177 Title: Remmina crashes aft

[Bug 2062177] Re: Remmina crashes after RDP connection

2024-04-26 Thread Alan Baghumian
I just rebuilt and installed fresh packages on Noble using the supplied patch above and all good now! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2062177 Title: Remmina crashes after RDP connectio

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2032164] Re: A general-proteciton exception during guest migration to unsupported PKRU machine

2023-09-18 Thread Alan Baghumian
We have now confirmed at three different locations that Live-Migration from PKRU PRE-5.15.0-85.95 to PKRU 5.15.0-85.95 compute nodes breaks. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2001567] Re: Add support for newer I219-LM NICs to the 5.4.0 kernel

2023-06-05 Thread Alan Baghumian
I'm not 100% if this trace is directly related to the NIC driver, however it was int middle of two "Unit Hang" messages, so I pasted it here. Might be a bi-product. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux in Ubuntu. https://b

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2001567] Re: Add support for newer I219-LM NICs to the 5.4.0 kernel

2023-06-05 Thread Alan Baghumian
Sun Jun 4 13:25:23 2023] [ cut here ] [Sun Jun 4 13:25:23 2023] NETDEV WATCHDOG: eno1 (e1000e): transmit queue 0 timed out [Sun Jun 4 13:25:23 2023] WARNING: CPU: 11 PID: 0 at net/sched/sch_generic.c:477 dev_watchdog+0x27a/0x290 [Sun Jun 4 13:25:23 2023] Modules linked

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2001567] Re: Add support for newer I219-LM NICs to the 5.4.0 kernel

2023-06-05 Thread Alan Baghumian
I disabled APMS under Advanced Settings in BIOS, but that did not make a difference. Also, upgraded one of the nodes to Focal HWE 5.15 kernel and both are still having the same issues -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to linux i

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 2001567] Re: Add support for newer I219-LM NICs to the 5.4.0 kernel

2023-06-04 Thread Alan Baghumian
This NIC is supported by the 5.4.0 Focal LTS kernel, however, any changes on the switch side or even disconnecting and connecting the Ethernet cable causes the card to hang: Jun 03 18:32:58 kvm-02 kernel: e1000e :00:1f.6 eno1: Detected Hardware Unit Hang: TDH

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1969457] Re: /dev/zvol links not created for encrypted zvols, zfs-volume-wait Timed out waiting on zvol links

2023-03-26 Thread Alan Baghumian
This is still happening, any progress on the fix? Mar 26 19:41:36 juju-868061-case00356962-2 zvol_wait[123774]: cannot open 'rpool/export/vault/block': dataset does not exist Mar 26 19:41:36 juju-868061-case00356962-2 sudo[120459]: pam_unix(sudo:session): session closed for user root Mar 26 19:4

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1782033] Re: "Alias=" missing from NetworkManager.service

2023-03-21 Thread Alan Baghumian
The network-manager package in Bionic and Focal install as symlink to NetworkManager.service correctly: https://packages.ubuntu.com/search?searchon=contents&keywords=network- manager.service&mode=exactfilename&suite=bionic&arch=any https://packages.ubuntu.com/search?searchon=contents&keywords=net

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1782033] Re: "Alias=" missing from NetworkManager.service

2023-03-21 Thread Alan Baghumian
The network-manager package in Bionic and Focal install as symlink to NetworkManager.service correctly: https://packages.ubuntu.com/search?searchon=contents&keywords=network- manager.service&mode=exactfilename&suite=bionic&arch=any https://packages.ubuntu.com/search?searchon=contents&keywords=net

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1975935] Re: Key input repeated unintendedly

2022-08-18 Thread Alan Baghumian
This is happening on a default Jammy GNOME install. No extra extensions. This starts when the machine reaches high uptime usually 2 weeks+ journalctl is full of: Aug 18 11:28:09 veloci gnome-shell[2558]: Key repeat discarded, Wayland compositor doesn't seem to be processing events fast enough!

[Bug 1975935] Re: Key input repeated unintendedly

2022-08-18 Thread Alan Baghumian
This is happening on a default Jammy GNOME install. No extra extensions. This starts when the machine reaches high uptime usually 2 weeks+ journalctl is full of: Aug 18 11:28:09 veloci gnome-shell[2558]: Key repeat discarded, Wayland compositor doesn't seem to be processing events fast enough!

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1573447] Re: large jpeg file crashes Eye of Gnome

2022-05-06 Thread Alan Baghumian
Just tested the above image with eog 3.36.3-0ubuntu1 (Focal) and it crashed (Virtual Machine with 2 CPU cores and 4GB RAM). Tested with eog 42.0-1 (Jammy) and it worked. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to eog in Ubuntu. https

[Bug 1573447] Re: large jpeg file crashes Eye of Gnome

2022-05-06 Thread Alan Baghumian
Just tested the above image with eog 3.36.3-0ubuntu1 (Focal) and it crashed (Virtual Machine with 2 CPU cores and 4GB RAM). Tested with eog 42.0-1 (Jammy) and it worked. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.laun

[Bug 1573447] Re: large jpeg file crashes Eye of Gnome

2022-05-06 Thread Alan Baghumian
Just tested the above image with eog 3.36.3-0ubuntu1 (Focal) and it crashed (Virtual Machine with 2 CPU cores and 4GB RAM). Tested with eog 42.0-1 (Jammy) and it worked. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to eog in Ubuntu. ht

[Bug 1774081] Re: /etc/gdm3/Init/Default not evaluated

2022-05-06 Thread Alan Baghumian
Just tested with gdm3 3.36.3-0ubuntu0.20.04.4 (Focal) and this is still happening. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1774081 Title: /etc/gdm3/Init/Default not evaluated To manage notifi

[Bug 1774081] Re: /etc/gdm3/Init/Default not evaluated

2022-05-06 Thread Alan Baghumian
Just tested with gdm3 3.36.3-0ubuntu0.20.04.4 (Focal) and this is still happening. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to gdm3 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1774081 Title: /etc/gdm3/Init/Default not evaluated

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1769372] Re: Prompt the user when the power button is pressed on a VM

2022-05-06 Thread Alan Baghumian
This is also affecting Virsh (KVM/QEMU) based virtual machines. Just tested with The latest Focal update (gnome-settings-daemon 3.36.1-0ubuntu1.1) and the machine was turned off without any notifications. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is

[Bug 1769372] Re: Prompt the user when the power button is pressed on a VM

2022-05-06 Thread Alan Baghumian
This is also affecting Virsh (KVM/QEMU) based virtual machines. Just tested with The latest Focal update (gnome-settings-daemon 3.36.1-0ubuntu1.1) and the machine was turned off without any notifications. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subs

[Bug 1769372] Re: Prompt the user when the power button is pressed on a VM

2022-05-06 Thread Alan Baghumian
This is also affecting Virsh (KVM/QEMU) based virtual machines. Just tested with The latest Focal update (gnome-settings-daemon 3.36.1-0ubuntu1.1) and the machine was turned off without any notifications. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which

[Bug 551432] Re: virt-manager create disk image with LVM hangs for ever

2022-05-06 Thread Alan Baghumian
This is no longer reproducible. I always create volumes this way and it works. The latest version tested with Jammy Jellyfish: 1:4.0.0-1 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/551432 Title: v

[Bug 337763] Re: virt-manager reboot action is non-functional

2022-05-06 Thread Alan Baghumian
This is no longer reproducible. I use this function all the time and it just works. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/337763 Title: virt-manager reboot action is non-functional To manag

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1576252] Re: Launching nautilus from the command line fails to bring window to front if open already

2022-05-06 Thread Alan Baghumian
Just tested with Focal's Nautilus 1:3.36.3-0ubuntu1.20.04.1 and was not able to reproduce this issue. Should be fixed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1576252 Title: L

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1879169] Re: Thumbs never updated after renaming a bunch of image files

2022-05-06 Thread Alan Baghumian
Just tested with Focal's Nautilus 1:3.36.3-0ubuntu1.20.04.1 and this does not happen. Followed the same scenario and renamed 2 out of 4 sample files: 1) Using Nautilus itself. 2) Closed Nautilus and renamed the files in terminal. In both cases Nautilus automatically regenerated the thumbnails.

[Bug 1879169] Re: Thumbs never updated after renaming a bunch of image files

2022-05-06 Thread Alan Baghumian
Just tested with Focal's Nautilus 1:3.36.3-0ubuntu1.20.04.1 and this does not happen. Followed the same scenario and renamed 2 out of 4 sample files: 1) Using Nautilus itself. 2) Closed Nautilus and renamed the files in terminal. In both cases Nautilus automatically regenerated the thumbnails.

[Bug 1576252] Re: Launching nautilus from the command line fails to bring window to front if open already

2022-05-06 Thread Alan Baghumian
Just tested with Focal's Nautilus 1:3.36.3-0ubuntu1.20.04.1 and was not able to reproduce this issue. Should be fixed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to nautilus in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1576252 Title:

[Bug 1576252] Re: Launching nautilus from the command line fails to bring window to front if open already

2022-05-06 Thread Alan Baghumian
Just tested with Focal's Nautilus 1:3.36.3-0ubuntu1.20.04.1 and was not able to reproduce this issue. Should be fixed. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1576252 Title: Launching nautilus

[Bug 1879169] Re: Thumbs never updated after renaming a bunch of image files

2022-05-06 Thread Alan Baghumian
Just tested with Focal's Nautilus 1:3.36.3-0ubuntu1.20.04.1 and this does not happen. Followed the same scenario and renamed 2 out of 4 sample files: 1) Using Nautilus itself. 2) Closed Nautilus and renamed the files in terminal. In both cases Nautilus automatically regenerated the thumbnails.

[Desktop-packages] [Bug 1444210] Re: Previewed files are not deleted

2022-05-06 Thread Alan Baghumian
I just tested this with Bionic and it seems to be fixed. Previewed files ~/.cache/.fr- no longer exist after closing file-roller. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Desktop Packages, which is subscribed to file-roller in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/14442

[Bug 1444210] Re: Previewed files are not deleted

2022-05-06 Thread Alan Baghumian
I just tested this with Bionic and it seems to be fixed. Previewed files ~/.cache/.fr- no longer exist after closing file-roller. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1444210 Title: Preview

[Bug 1444210] Re: Previewed files are not deleted

2022-05-06 Thread Alan Baghumian
I just tested this with Bionic and it seems to be fixed. Previewed files ~/.cache/.fr- no longer exist after closing file-roller. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Desktop Bugs, which is subscribed to file-roller in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/14

[Bug 1904580] Re: Permissions 0644 for '/var/lib/nova/.ssh/id_rsa' are too open

2022-03-29 Thread Alan Baghumian
I just did a test myself and the bug is still present. Simply re-install your nova-common package and there goes the SSH key permissions. As others mentioned, it is indeed this line in the postinst script: find /var/lib/nova -type f -exec chmod 0644 "{}" + -o -type d -exec chmod 0755 "{}" + -- Y

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1959085] Re: Ubuntu 22.04 boot stuck in initramfs, when installed with zfs encryption

2022-02-25 Thread Alan Baghumian
Thank you all for investigating and fixing this. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1959085 Title: Ubuntu 22.04 boot stuck in initramfs, when installed

[Bug 1959085] Re: Ubuntu 22.04 boot stuck in initramfs, when installed with zfs encryption

2022-02-25 Thread Alan Baghumian
Thank you all for investigating and fixing this. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1959085 Title: Ubuntu 22.04 boot stuck in initramfs, when installed with zfs encryption To manage no

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1959085] Re: Ubuntu 22.04 boot stuck in initramfs, when installed with zfs encryption

2022-02-25 Thread Alan Baghumian
Thank you all for investigating and fixing this. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to zfs-linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1959085 Title: Ubuntu 22.04 boot stuck in initramfs, when installed with zfs encrypt

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1959085] Re: Ubuntu 21.10 boot stuck in initramfs

2022-02-21 Thread Alan Baghumian
I confirmed this is happening. Here are two ways to reproduce: 1) Grabbed jammy-desktop-amd64.iso nightly build (Feb 2). Installing a system using this ISO, while choosing Encryption + ZFS lands you on this error. 2) Installed Impish using an ISO from October 12, choosing Encryption + ZFS. The sy

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1959085] Re: Ubuntu 21.10 boot stuck in initramfs

2022-02-21 Thread Alan Baghumian
I confirmed this is happening. Here are two ways to reproduce: 1) Grabbed jammy-desktop-amd64.iso nightly build (Feb 2). Installing a system using this ISO, while choosing Encryption + ZFS lands you on this error. 2) Installed Impish using an ISO from October 12, choosing Encryption + ZFS. The sy

[Bug 1959085] Re: Ubuntu 21.10 boot stuck in initramfs

2022-02-21 Thread Alan Baghumian
I confirmed this is happening. Here are two ways to reproduce: 1) Grabbed jammy-desktop-amd64.iso nightly build (Feb 2). Installing a system using this ISO, while choosing Encryption + ZFS lands you on this error. 2) Installed Impish using an ISO from October 12, choosing Encryption + ZFS. The sy

[Bug 1960974] Re: Ubiquity 22.04.4 - ZFS Encrypted disk drops in busybox shell with permission denied error

2022-02-21 Thread Alan Baghumian
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1959085 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1959085 I performed some tests last night and confirm this is indeed unrelated to Ubiquity and related to #1959085. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1959085 Ubuntu 21.10 boot stuck in initramfs --

[Bug 1960974] Re: Ubiquity 22.04.4 - ZFS Encrypted disk drops in busybox shell with permission denied error

2022-02-16 Thread Alan Baghumian
This seems to be related to #1959085, going to try it later to confirm that Ubiquity is not the culprit. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1960974 Title: Ubiquity 22.04.4 - ZFS Encrypted

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1959085] Re: Ubuntu 21.10 boot stuck in initramfs

2022-02-16 Thread Alan Baghumian
I just found this, I encountered this exact same issue with Jammy Desktop installer last night and filed a bug here : #1960974 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.n

[Kernel-packages] [Bug 1959085] Re: Ubuntu 21.10 boot stuck in initramfs

2022-02-16 Thread Alan Baghumian
I just found this, I encountered this exact same issue with Jammy Desktop installer last night and filed a bug here : #1960974 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel Packages, which is subscribed to zfs-linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1959085 Ti

[Bug 1959085] Re: Ubuntu 21.10 boot stuck in initramfs

2022-02-16 Thread Alan Baghumian
I just found this, I encountered this exact same issue with Jammy Desktop installer last night and filed a bug here : #1960974 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1959085 Title: Ubuntu 21.

[Bug 1960974] [NEW] Ubiquity 22.04.4 - ZFS Encrypted disk drops in busybox shell with permission denied error

2022-02-15 Thread Alan Baghumian
Public bug reported: 1) Booted Ubuntu Jammy Desktop ISO made using UNetbootin 2) Started installer 3) Picked Erase Disk + ZFS + Encryption 4) Installation completed successfully and the machine reboots 5) After asking decryption password, the system drops in a busybox shell, with permission denie

[Bug 1960974] Re: Ubiquity 22.04.4 - ZFS Encrypted disk drops in busybox shell with permission denied error

2022-02-15 Thread Alan Baghumian
** Attachment added: "Decryption password prompt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1960974/+attachment/5561119/+files/PXL_20220216_001903736.jpg -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.la

Bug#991373: zfs-dkms libpython3-stdlib << 3.6.4 dependency uninstallable on buster

2021-07-21 Thread Alan Baghumian
Package: zfs-dkms Version: 2.0.3-1~bpo10+1 Severity: normal -- System Information: Debian Release: 10.10 APT prefers stable-updates APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 5.10.0-0.bpo.5-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores) Kernel taint flags: TA

Bug#821409: gtk+3.0: gtk3 apps seem to be graphically broken since the most recent updates

2016-04-18 Thread Alan Baghumian
ote: > Am 18.04.2016 um 18:09 schrieb Alan Baghumian: > > Hi Guys, > > > > Regarding transparency of selected text in Evolution, the package needs > > to be recompiled using webkitgtk 2.4.10+ and that will fix it. > > I thought webkit needed a rebuild against gtk 3.20, not e

Bug#821409: gtk+3.0: gtk3 apps seem to be graphically broken since the most recent updates

2016-04-18 Thread Alan Baghumian
Hi Guys, Regarding transparency of selected text in Evolution, the package needs to be recompiled using webkitgtk 2.4.10+ and that will fix it. - AlanOn Mon, 2016-04-18 at 17:48 +0200, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: > On Mon, 2016-04-18 at 17:42 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > > > > No idea about t

Accepted jalali-calendar 1.6.9-1 (source all)

2010-07-13 Thread Alan Baghumian
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2010 20:29:28 -0800 Source: jalali-calendar Binary: jalali-calendar Architecture: source all Version: 1.6.9-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Arabic Packaging Team Changed-By: Alan Baghumian

Accepted myspell-hy 0.20.0-1 (source all)

2010-06-20 Thread Alan Baghumian
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2010 06:47:42 +0300 Source: myspell-hy Binary: myspell-hy Architecture: source all Version: 0.20.0-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Alan Baghumian Changed-By: Alan Baghumian Description: myspell-hy

Accepted balsa 2.4.1-1 (source amd64)

2009-11-01 Thread Alan Baghumian
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 20:15:56 -0700 Source: balsa Binary: balsa balsa-dbg Architecture: source amd64 Version: 2.4.1-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian GNOME Maintainers Changed-By: Alan Baghumian Description

Accepted balsa 2.4.1-1 (source amd64)

2009-10-24 Thread Alan Baghumian
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 20:15:56 -0700 Source: balsa Binary: balsa balsa-dbg Architecture: source amd64 Version: 2.4.1-1 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian GNOME Maintainers Changed-By: Alan Baghumian Description

Accepted myspell-fa 0.20070816-2 (source all)

2009-09-25 Thread Alan Baghumian
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 22:14:36 -0700 Source: myspell-fa Binary: myspell-fa Architecture: source all Version: 0.20070816-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Arabic Packaging Team Changed-By: Alan Baghumian

Accepted myspell-hy 0.10.1-2 (source all)

2009-09-21 Thread Alan Baghumian
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 19:40:06 -0700 Source: myspell-hy Binary: myspell-hy Architecture: source all Version: 0.10.1-2 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Alan Baghumian Changed-By: Alan Baghumian Description: myspell-hy

Bug#543375: util-linux: Superblock last mount time is in the future

2009-09-17 Thread Alan Baghumian
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Guys, A temporary workaround for the problem is to edit /etc/default/rcS file and set FSCKFIX to yes. At least it wont stop your boot process asking for manual fsck run. Hopefully maintainers can put together soon to fix this. Thanks, Alan --

  1   2   3   4   >