Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Document-Policy: expect-no-linked-resources

2024-12-24 Thread 'Alex N. Jose' via blink-dev
Thanks Mike and Yoav. Acknowledging the non-blocking follow up work. On Fri, Dec 20, 2024 at 3:14 PM Yoav Weiss (@Shopify) < yoavwe...@chromium.org> wrote: > LGTM2 > > +1 for a continuous holdback study that can help us detect abuse resulting > in real-life regressions. > > On Wednesday, Decembe

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Document-Policy: expect-no-linked-resources

2024-12-13 Thread &#x27;Alex N. Jose&#x27; via blink-dev
Re: the consent management use case — that's right; a directive that disables speculative scan explicitly would help the consent use case more. However, future optimizations would find it difficult to wiggle out of such a contract. Hence a hint was chosen. From what Transcend described on the issue

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Document-Policy: expect-no-linked-resources

2024-12-12 Thread &#x27;Alex N. Jose&#x27; via blink-dev
Re: additional interest, Transcend.io had expressed interest in using the feature for preventing the preload scanner from loading URLs in sensitive contexts, prior to consent (non-performance improvement use case). Search is currently the on