lør. 15. apr. 2023, 6:20 a.m. skrev Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-business <
agora-busin...@agoranomic.org>:
> I create and submit the following Proposal:
>
> Title: Unradiance
> AI: 1.0
> Author: Yachay
> Co-Authors: None
>
> {
>
> Repeal Rule 2657
>
> }
>
I dislike this mostly because this isn't c
I think the other forms to gain radiance seem alright, actually. This just
removes the "radiance conditions", of the which I'm not a huge fan of
(gaining radiance from proposals, mostly)
On Sat, Apr 15, 2023 at 6:31 PM Forest Sweeney via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
On 4/15/23 09:59, Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-discussion wrote:
I think the other forms to gain radiance seem alright, actually. This just
removes the "radiance conditions", of the which I'm not a huge fan of
(gaining radiance from proposals, mostly)
On Sat, Apr 15, 2023 at 6:31 PM Forest Sweeney
On 4/15/23 03:04, Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-business wrote:
I vote {AGAINST, but FOR instead if its author pledges or already is bound
to a pledge to not claim the Radiance they'd get from this Proposal passing}
If you want to change this I recommend writing a proposal to do so.
Right now it
On 4/15/23 13:39, nix via agora-discussion wrote:
If you want to change this I recommend writing a proposal to do so.
Right now it feels more like taking hostages than negotiating.
Ope! Disregard, didn't see the proposal introduced after.
--
nix
Prime Minister, Herald, Collector
On 4/15/23 18:32, Yachay Wayllukuq via agora-business wrote:
Oh, I just saw Snail's action.
If I can, I reach for the Recursion Stone
As of the current rules there's nothing wrong with reaching for the same
one. Only one person will get eir reach anyway.
--
nix
Prime Minister, Herald
6 matches
Mail list logo
