On Tue, 19 May 2009, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
> 2009/5/19 Alex Smith :
>> NoVing shouldn't be some sort of heavyweight drastic action, that's what
>> the courts are for. It should be a way to give people wrist-slaps for
>> late reports, etc.
>>
> Spending one note to destroy one rest does sound log
2009/5/19 Alex Smith :
> On Tue, 2009-05-19 at 13:37 -0400, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>> On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 1:31 PM, Elliott Hird
>> wrote:
>> > 2009/5/19 Geoffrey Spear :
>> >> On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 5:44 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> >>> Sun 17 May 21:30:09 2499 comex recused
>> >>> Sun 17 May 21:
On Mon, 27 Oct 2008, Alex Smith wrote:
> Gratuitous arguments: I identified the contract as the one named UNDEAD.
> If that contract doesn't exist, clearly the intent fails.
If there's one that has that name, but don't know it exists, have you
"clearly" identified it?
If there's more than one t
On Mon, 2008-10-27 at 18:15 -0400, comex wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 6:12 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > You may need it, but it doesn't mean that you can compel it or that you're
> > going to get it. -Goethe.
>
> Then the CotC is just going to have to assign CFJ 2223.
But t
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 6:12 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You may need it, but it doesn't mean that you can compel it or that you're
> going to get it. -Goethe.
Then the CotC is just going to have to assign CFJ 2223.
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 7:21 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ? I just did ?
nevermind.
On Tue, 21 Oct 2008, comex wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 2:22 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> ais523 brought up another possibility so let me add: I am unaware of
>> the existence any pledge with the above identifier (merely backs up the
>> accepted COE on behalf of Murphy). -Goe
On Mon, 20 Oct 2008, Elliott Hird wrote:
> On 20 Oct 2008, at 23:01, Charles Reiss wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 22:22, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> [snip]
>>> 2223 ais523UNDEAD PT ends 10/23 05:02:46
>>
>> Claim of Error: ais523 is not a party to
comex wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 13, 2008 at 6:31 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> ais523 wrote:
>>> CoE: This does not contain a list of active Monsters.
>> Denied. Activity is not defined for the Monster, thus the list was
>> empty, thus the report was accurate by omission.
>
> I would di
2008/7/19 Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> tusho wrote:
>
>> 2008/7/19 Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>> ehrid (aka Teh Cltohed Mna ...)
>>
>> CoE: No longer.
>
> Please explain this more clearly.
>
>
Someone deregistered ehrid, sometime. :p
On Jun 22, 2008, at 12:30 PM, comex wrote:
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 12:43 AM, Benjamin Schultz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It's now well past tomorrow.
You know, I had already published my apology when you sent this
message.
Actually, my message fell into a grey area, and got sent out Fri
On Fri, Jun 20, 2008 at 12:43 AM, Benjamin Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's now well past tomorrow.
You know, I had already published my apology when you sent this message.
On Jun 22, 2008, at 11:09 AM, Ed Murphy wrote:
OscarMeyr wrote:
I initiate a criminal CFJ against comex, for violating Rule 1504 by
not publishing eir apology as per the sentence from CFJ 1942 within
the time frame specified in R1504. (See evidence above.)
Already prosecuted via CFJ 2022.
OscarMeyr wrote:
> I initiate a criminal CFJ against comex, for violating Rule 1504 by
> not publishing eir apology as per the sentence from CFJ 1942 within
> the time frame specified in R1504. (See evidence above.)
Already prosecuted via CFJ 2022. Want to retract this one?
> Is it just me
14 matches
Mail list logo
