Re: DIS: Re: BUS: CFJ 4072 Judged TRUE

2024-03-29 Thread Janet Cobb via agora-discussion
On 3/25/24 18:10, nix via agora-discussion wrote: > On 3/16/24 22:08, Janet Cobb via agora-business wrote: >> So, a potential point of disagreement here is what *exactly* this >> standard is requiring. Importantly, I think it's unclear whether the >> requirement for the "specification of the method

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: CFJ 4072 Judged TRUE

2024-03-16 Thread nix via agora-discussion
On 3/16/24 14:58, nix via agora-discussion wrote: > One quick thought to add: I suspect one or two people will want to > reconsider this. If they do, I strongly suggest they come up with > compelling arguments for why this was missed by every CFJ on Rule 105, > every Promotor, and every player in 1