Precisely because its gameplay-related is what makes it interesting (to me,
personally).
It's like finding a lego block and finding that it somehow relates to the
beginning of the universe.
Also, there seems to be a "Critical Mass" of activity that the Ruleset/game
design can handle at any time.
On Mon, 29 May 2017, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
> Given the recent problems regarding philosophical discussion:
>
> How would people feel about making a new mailing list for these discussions
> to take place and maybe the Herald could post weekly summaries to official?
> This would a
As long as the discussions of philosophy have implications on the game
state, this will never be a functional solution.
Also, if my deregistration statement didn't make it clear, the problem is
not philosophy on face.
On May 29, 2017 4:03 PM, "Publius Scribonius Scholasticus" <
p.scribonius.schol
3 matches
Mail list logo
