Re: DIS: [draft] CFJ 4069 Judgement

2024-03-16 Thread 4st nomic via agora-discussion
On Sat, Mar 16, 2024 at 9:53 AM Janet Cobb via agora-discussion < agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote: > On 3/14/24 17:46, 4st nomic via agora-discussion wrote: > > PLEASE NOTE, unfortunately, no mechanism is actually provided for the > > Rulekeepor to officially assign numbers to rules, and as

Re: DIS: [draft] CFJ 4069 Judgement

2024-03-16 Thread Janet Cobb via agora-discussion
On 3/14/24 17:46, 4st nomic via agora-discussion wrote: > PLEASE NOTE, unfortunately, no mechanism is actually provided for the > Rulekeepor to officially assign numbers to rules, and as the Rulekeepor > must track rule/ID numbers, this means it is a game action and is REGULATED > under the 2020 ru

Re: DIS: [draft] CFJ 4069 Judgement

2024-03-15 Thread 4st nomic via agora-discussion
Additionally, in the FALSE case, the judge has been asked to clarify what should occur: This is an unofficial opinion of what should occur, but: amendments to TRWC105T would be too ambiguous to enact changes. Firstly, a something that is not a rule but was once a rule is untracked and has the rule/