Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Paradox cleanup

2008-06-18 Thread comex
On 6/18/08, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Non-persons can't register. Nor can they even attempt to register, > since they cannot perform actions by definition. It is possible for judicial panels to take actions, even though they are not persons.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Paradox cleanup

2008-06-18 Thread Ian Kelly
On Wed, Jun 18, 2008 at 3:08 AM, Alexander Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Ineffective. Proposal effects are instantaneous, not continuous. > Where does it say that? When a proposal is adopted, it "takes effect". It does not go into effect and henceforth remain there. That's what rules are

RE: DIS: Re: BUS: Paradox cleanup

2008-06-18 Thread Alexander Smith
Murphy wrote: > ais523 wrote: >> root wrote: >>> What is unknown about the current set of CFJs? >> Whether comex filed an equity case against the Gnarlier Contract. (E >> tried to, and it was found UNDECIDABLE whether this was possible, so >> I can only include that it's undecidable whether e creat

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Paradox cleanup

2008-06-18 Thread Ed Murphy
ais523 wrote: > root wrote: >> What is unknown about the current set of CFJs? > Whether comex filed an equity case against the Gnarlier Contract. (E > tried to, and it was found UNDECIDABLE whether this was possible, so > I can only include that it's undecidable whether e created the CFJ. > Murp