On 27 Nov 2008, at 19:02, Alexander Smith wrote:
I know a large number of people who refuse to run Mono for
philosophical reasons (although I'm not one of them). More
to the point, there's no version of it available for Mac
OS X, as far as I know.
there is. However, I support Wooble's idea to
comex wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 11:31 AM, Elliott Hird
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 26 Nov 2008, at 16:30, Roger Hicks wrote:
> >> I can in my preferred language of choice.
> > VB.Net, right? Does "everywhere" include "non-Windows systems"?
> mono
I know a large number of people who r
On 26 Nov 2008, at 20:55, Jamie Dallaire wrote:
Yep. Sorry what I said wasn't super clear. Don't construe that to
mean I think everyone here boycotts Windows. Probably some do, but
really I meant that it's unlikely to be EVERYONE's main working
environment. I only recently semi-weaned off x
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 3:36 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Billy Pilgrim wrote:
>
> > Heh it definitely should. I'm on linux here and just can't imagine that
> > all these nomic players are running xp/vista...
>
> I process e-mail from XP, but my server runs Linux (Red Hat 9, because
Billy Pilgrim wrote:
> Heh it definitely should. I'm on linux here and just can't imagine that
> all these nomic players are running xp/vista...
I process e-mail from XP, but my server runs Linux (Red Hat 9, because
it was pre-installed and I dare not risk breaking it).
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 1:37 PM, Jamie Dallaire
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> since how my program
> interacts with Kerim's program won't have any impact on whether or not
> Kerim's program chooses to cooperate with root's,
Allow each script to know the name of the author of the other!
Would be so
I agree entirely.
My initial proposal was to score according to totals, not to win
differentials, though I may not have expressed that clearly. i.e. it's
better to cooperate and get minorly exploited than to get locked into a
cycle of retaliation where hardly anyone gets any points in the entire
m
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 1:15 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 26 Nov 2008, comex wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 12:42 PM, Charles Reiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >> I would prefer the source be available for a post-mortem. For source
> >> submissions, probably the be
On Wed, 26 Nov 2008, comex wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 12:42 PM, Charles Reiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I would prefer the source be available for a post-mortem. For source
>> submissions, probably the best scheme would be for people to send the
>> source to a discreet contestmaster.
>
>
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 12:42 PM, Charles Reiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would prefer the source be available for a post-mortem. For source
> submissions, probably the best scheme would be for people to send the
> source to a discreet contestmaster.
Concur. A dishonest contestmaster could j
While we're debating executables for this, I thought I'd raise another
issue: scoring.
One of the features of "cooperation" experiments is that, rationally,
how well your opponent does shouldn't affect you. For example, if your
opponent offers you $1 and keeps $19, the point of the game is tha
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 09:15, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 26 Nov 2008, at 17:05, Roger Hicks wrote:
>
>> I believe that Mono is the .NET library ported to unix based systems.
>> I could be wrong however.
>
> Yes, but you can't use a Windows binary. And revealing source would damag
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 10:15, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 26 Nov 2008, at 17:05, Roger Hicks wrote:
>
>> I believe that Mono is the .NET library ported to unix based systems.
>> I could be wrong however.
>
> Yes, but you can't use a Windows binary. And revealing source would damag
On Wed, 26 Nov 2008, Elliott Hird wrote:
> On 26 Nov 2008, at 16:26, Jamie Dallaire wrote:
>
>> So, I was wrong in my assumption, then, that you could compile a program
>> written in essentially any language into some sort of executable file that
>> could be run anywhere?
>
> llvm, java, etc...
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 12:15 PM, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, but you can't use a Windows binary. And revealing source would damage
> the contest, if I understand it.
Presumably everyone using a scripting language would reveal the source
to the contestmaster anyway.
On 26 Nov 2008, at 17:05, Roger Hicks wrote:
I believe that Mono is the .NET library ported to unix based systems.
I could be wrong however.
Yes, but you can't use a Windows binary. And revealing source would
damage
the contest, if I understand it.
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 09:31, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 26 Nov 2008, at 16:30, Roger Hicks wrote:
>
>> I can in my preferred language of choice.
>
> VB.Net, right? Does "everywhere" include "non-Windows systems"?
>
I believe that Mono is the .NET library ported to unix based sys
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 11:31 AM, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 26 Nov 2008, at 16:30, Roger Hicks wrote:
>> I can in my preferred language of choice.
> VB.Net, right? Does "everywhere" include "non-Windows systems"?
mono
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 11:31 AM, Elliott Hird <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 26 Nov 2008, at 16:30, Roger Hicks wrote:
>
> I can in my preferred language of choice.
>>
>
> VB.Net, right? Does "everywhere" include "non-Windows systems"?
Heh it definitely should. I'm on linux here and just can
On 26 Nov 2008, at 16:30, Roger Hicks wrote:
I can in my preferred language of choice.
VB.Net, right? Does "everywhere" include "non-Windows systems"?
On 26 Nov 2008, at 16:26, Jamie Dallaire wrote:
So, I was wrong in my assumption, then, that you could compile a
program written in essentially any language into some sort of
executable file that could be run anywhere?
llvm, java, etc...
Pick yer poison.
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 09:26, Jamie Dallaire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So, I was wrong in my assumption, then, that you could compile a program
> written in essentially any language into some sort of executable file that
> could be run anywhere?
>
I can in my preferred language of choice.
BobT
On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 4:25 AM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I think these are big enough cons, you really want round-robin multiple
> rounds. I don't think you have to worry too much about assembly, etc.,
> you're probably offering enough diversity if you offer a small range of
>
On Tue, 25 Nov 2008, Charles Reiss wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 22:44, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 23:32, Charles Reiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> That's what I'd expect in this form given that expecting people to
>>> know how to program usually isn't
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 22:44, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 23:32, Charles Reiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> That's what I'd expect in this form given that expecting people to
>> know how to program usually isn't considered unreasonable. But, of
>> course, ther
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 23:32, Charles Reiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's what I'd expect in this form given that expecting people to
> know how to program usually isn't considered unreasonable. But, of
> course, there are practical problems with doing any-language-you-want
> (do you have a
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 22:19, Jamie Dallaire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 3:26 AM, Charles Reiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 23:53, Pavitra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>> > I would have more interest if it was in a toy language like Befunge.
>
On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 3:26 AM, Charles Reiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 23:53, Pavitra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > I would have more interest if it was in a toy language like Befunge.
> >
>
> I don't think that would help that much. The interesting part of the
> pr
On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 23:53, Pavitra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Saturday 22 November 2008 08:58:16 am Joshua Boehme wrote:
>> On Fri, 21 Nov 2008 00:24:52 -0500
>>
>> "Jamie Dallaire" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Cross posting because I figure there could be interest on both
>> > sides. I
On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 00:53, Pavitra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would have more interest if it was in a toy language like Befunge.
>
Befunge would be fun
BobTHJ
On Sat, Nov 22, 2008 at 9:58 AM, Joshua Boehme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Nov 2008 00:24:52 -0500
> "Jamie Dallaire" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Cross posting because I figure there could be interest on both sides. If
> > need be this can be a Werewolves-like endeavour.
> >
> > W
On Saturday 22 November 2008 08:58:16 am Joshua Boehme wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Nov 2008 00:24:52 -0500
>
> "Jamie Dallaire" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Cross posting because I figure there could be interest on both
> > sides. If need be this can be a Werewolves-like endeavour.
> >
> > Would anyone b
On Fri, 21 Nov 2008 00:24:52 -0500
"Jamie Dallaire" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Cross posting because I figure there could be interest on both sides. If
> need be this can be a Werewolves-like endeavour.
>
> Would anyone be interested in playing the following, based on Robert
> Axelrod's and WD
On Fri, 21 Nov 2008, Jamie Dallaire wrote:
> Would anyone be interested in playing the following, based on Robert
> Axelrod's and WD Hamilton's "The Evolution of Cooperation"? (see links
> below)
I heartily support this product and/or service.
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 10:24 PM, Jamie Dallaire
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Cross posting because I figure there could be interest on both sides. If
> need be this can be a Werewolves-like endeavour.
>
> Would anyone be interested in playing the following, based on Robert
> Axelrod's and WD Hamil
35 matches
Mail list logo
