Zefram wrote:
> This isn't a bug, it's a feature.
What's the advantage?
A wider range of voting tactics. Specifically, if a vote is lackluster
in turnout, you can sink it by not voting, rather than voting AGAINST,
when an AGAINST vote wouldn't be enough to sink it. Turns not voting
into an
Kerim Aydin wrote:
>This isn't a bug, it's a feature.
What's the advantage?
-zefram
Zefram wrote:
There is a problem with the usual way quorum works, that
there are situations where voting AGAINST a proposal actually makes it
more likely to pass. (For example, if there have been four votes FOR and
there is a quorum of five.)
This isn't a bug, it's a feature.
Working with d
3 matches
Mail list logo