* don't think I've _ever_ used it. That was a typo, not an attempt at verbal
trickery,
-twg
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Tuesday, November 27, 2018 11:58 PM, Timon Walshe-Grey
wrote:
> I would like to point out that neither of my proposals are even going to be
> adopted unless a larg
I would like to point out that neither of my proposals are even going to be
adopted unless a large swathe of people change their minds suddenly and against
character, so y'all are massively overthinking this...
As for the pledge, I agree with G., it's entirely unreasonable. The Assessor's
abili
I see potential impeachment as an additional rather than an alternative
disincentive
On Nov 27, 2018 12:16, "Kerim Aydin" wrote:
If I were the assessor, I wouldn't make this pledge personally. It's
far too constraining for a few votes, and as I mentioned there's some
good and valid reasons to
If I were the assessor, I wouldn't make this pledge personally. It's
far too constraining for a few votes, and as I mentioned there's some
good and valid reasons to resolve out-of-order, and 5 is a high bar.
Your original intent was just to make sure 8133 was resolved before the
others in this
4 matches
Mail list logo
