On Fri, 14 Jun 2019 at 23:48, D. Margaux wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 6:39 PM omd wrote:
> > Perhaps simplify to something like:
> >
> > * Publishing an office's weekly or monthly report for the first
> > time in a given week or month (resp.): 5 coins.
> >
> > Though I suppose m
Good find! Yes, it is. That proposal would have accidentally required that
the report only be counted if it fulfilled all of the weekly or monthly
duties of an office; this phrasing avoids that problem.
-Aris
On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 3:51 PM Jason Cobb wrote:
> Is this substantially different in
Is this substantially different in any way from Proposal 8162 [0], which
failed by a large margin [1]? (Found it while I was looking through past
proposals, as one does). The circumstances probably are different now,
though.
[0]:
https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-of
On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 6:39 PM omd wrote:
>
> Perhaps simplify to something like:
>
> * Publishing an office's weekly or monthly report for the first
> time in a given week or month (resp.): 5 coins.
>
> Though I suppose my wording is ambiguous as to whether you can claim
> the rew
On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 11:42 AM Kerim Aydin wrote:
> Amend Rule 2496 (Rewards) by replacing:
> Publishing a duty-fulfilling report:
> with:
> Publishing a duty-fulfilling official report:
So this would now read
* Publishing a duty-fulfilling official report: 5 coins. For
I think this covers stuff w.r.t the report Rewards issue - comments?
Proto-proposal "Report Rewards", AI-2:
[First prevent Contracts from defining offices, then limit rewards to
official reports (which are pretty well-defined)].
Amend Rule 1006 (Offices) by prepending the following text to the 1
6 matches
Mail list logo
