Re: DIS: Reminder: nch didn't like scams of new systems, ... until e did

2020-06-23 Thread Jason Cobb via agora-discussion
On 6/23/20 10:15 AM, nch via agora-discussion wrote: > On 6/23/20 9:13 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via agora-discussion > wrote: >> I'm aware; in fact, I was planning to do this scam. Nevertheless, this >> isn't "play[ing] the games we design for a bit first". > Look, I'm 100% for you stop

Re: DIS: Reminder: nch didn't like scams of new systems, ... until e did

2020-06-23 Thread nch via agora-discussion
On 6/23/20 9:13 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via agora-discussion wrote: > I'm aware; in fact, I was planning to do this scam. Nevertheless, this > isn't "play[ing] the games we design for a bit first". Look, I'm 100% for you stopping the scam. If the opposition stops it that's fair game.

Re: DIS: Reminder: nch didn't like scams of new systems, ... until e did

2020-06-23 Thread Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via agora-discussion
On 6/23/20 10:11 AM, nch via agora-discussion wrote: > On 6/23/20 9:10 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via agora-discussion > wrote: > > This isn't a result of any rules I wrote, it was pre-existing. You > could've done this to the money win. > I'm aware; in fact, I was planning to do this

Re: DIS: Reminder: nch didn't like scams of new systems, ... until e did

2020-06-23 Thread nch via agora-discussion
On 6/23/20 9:10 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via agora-discussion wrote: > On 6/10/20 3:06 PM, nch via agora-discussion wrote: >> I actually meant that out of mild frustration. Sets hasn't started and >> we're about to pass a gameplay tweak meant to 'fix' something that's >> supposedly wron

DIS: Reminder: nch didn't like scams of new systems, ... until e did

2020-06-23 Thread Publius Scribonius Scholasticus via agora-discussion
On 6/10/20 3:06 PM, nch via agora-discussion wrote: > I actually meant that out of mild frustration. Sets hasn't started and > we're about to pass a gameplay tweak meant to 'fix' something that's > supposedly wrong with it, and it's frustrating to see that the first > thing anyone plans to do wi

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Reminder to claim violet ribbons

2018-11-04 Thread Ørjan Johansen
On Sun, 4 Nov 2018, Edward Murphy wrote: CFJ, barring twg: twg is Referee. Caller's arguments: * Oct 30, D. Margaux resigned Referee * Nov 1, twg published the Referee's report but did not announce that e was deputising (as required by Rule 2160 item #5) Gratuitous argument: E had just p

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Reminder to claim violet ribbons

2018-11-01 Thread ATMunn
Huh, I was sure I awarded myself one last night after seeing the post. I guess I didn't. On 11/1/2018 1:46 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote: Oh foo, I award a Violet ribbon to each of the below-indicated persons who doesn't have one yet. Notice of Honour +1 twg (reminding us) -1 Trigon (a little less

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Reminder to claim violet ribbons

2018-11-01 Thread Kerim Aydin
oh I *totally* misread the transparent ribbon rule when I went for it last and didn't see this subtlety. Nice one, and hopefully I didn't mess up anyone's strategies. On Thu, 1 Nov 2018, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote: > Yes, but if you don't already own the ribbon before earning it, there is a > lo

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Reminder to claim violet ribbons

2018-11-01 Thread Timon Walshe-Grey
Yes, but if you don't already own the ribbon before earning it, there is a longer time period in which it counts towards the transparent ribbon. For example: Day 1 12:00: You earn a violet ribbon, but don't qualify for it because you already have one. The earning of the violet ribbon begins to

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Reminder to claim violet ribbons

2018-11-01 Thread Reuben Staley
Actually, that's false. You don't have to award yourself five ribbons to get Transparent, you just have to meet the qualifications. On Thu, Nov 1, 2018, 01:45 Timon Walshe-Grey wrote: > No way to take it back now, but for future reference, awarding someone a > (non-grey) ribbon against eir will

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Reminder to claim violet ribbons

2018-11-01 Thread Timon Walshe-Grey
No way to take it back now, but for future reference, awarding someone a (non-grey) ribbon against eir will is not necessarily a boon, because it makes it marginally more difficult to qualify for a transparent ribbon in the future. You already have one, but ATMunn and Corona don't. (Nor does Tri

DIS: Reminder to claim violet ribbons

2018-10-30 Thread Timon Walshe-Grey
The following players earned Violet Ribbons for participating in PAoaM and can still claim them up until Saturday: ATMunn Corona G. Trigon (I internally debated with myself about whether to remind you, but my fairness-loving side won out.) -twg

Re: DIS: Reminder: Birthday Tournament

2017-07-02 Thread Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
Yes. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > On Jul 2, 2017, at 5:27 PM, Aris Merchant > wrote: > > > On Sun, Jul 2, 2017 at 2:25 PM Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > wrote: > I just wanted to remind everyone that the Birthday Tournament has begun. >

Re: DIS: Reminder: Birthday Tournament

2017-07-02 Thread Aris Merchant
On Sun, Jul 2, 2017 at 2:25 PM Publius Scribonius Scholasticus < p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote: > I just wanted to remind everyone that the Birthday Tournament has begun. > > Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > > > > Did you ever actually

DIS: Reminder: Birthday Tournament

2017-07-02 Thread Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
I just wanted to remind everyone that the Birthday Tournament has begun. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

Re: DIS: reminder

2009-02-16 Thread Ed Murphy
ais523 wrote: > There are some judicial requirements which are currently overdue; in fact, > a few are getting to the point where in a few days the CotC will be late > to recuse the judges responsible. This is just a reminder to judges to > check ; it

DIS: reminder

2009-02-15 Thread Alexander Smith
There are some judicial requirements which are currently overdue; in fact, a few are getting to the point where in a few days the CotC will be late to recuse the judges responsible. This is just a reminder to judges to check ; it would be rather sad if