Ed Murphy wrote:
>I recommend specifying when NEV is measured.
I think it's better to leave it dependent on when voter eligibility
is measured. The two should go together. The better fix is to specify
when voter eligibility is determined.
> (The late
Zefram wrote:
The quorum for an Agoran decision is ceil(sqrt(NEV)), where NEV
is the number of eligible voters on that decision.
I recommend specifying when NEV is measured. (The latest fix specifies
beginning-of-voting-period.)
More possible quorum formulae:
>NEV 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
>current rule 1 2 3 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 6 6 6 7 7
>ceil(sqrt(NEV)) 1 2 2 2 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 5 5
>floor(1.5*sqrt(NEV)) 1 2 2 3 3 3 3 4 4 4
Michael Slone wrote:
>This would look better written out.
Would "the ceiling of ..." be clear enough, or does it have to be
a postfix "... rounded up to the next integer"? Or would fractional
quorum be OK, which gives the same effect?
>I can't say I support the decrease in quorum.
Is it the dec
On 5/31/07, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The quorum for an Agoran decision is ceil(sqrt(NEV)), where NEV
^^^
This would look better written out.
I can't say I support the decrease in quorum.
--
C. Maud Image (Michael Slone)
Aww
proto-proposal: square root quorum
AI: 2
{{{
Amend rule 879 by replacing the text:
The quorum for an Agoran decision is one third the number of
eligible voters, rounded up, with a minimum of five (unless
there are fewer than five eligible voters, in which case the
quorum
6 matches
Mail list logo
