Re: DIS: proto: distributor as an office

2007-08-24 Thread Zefram
Ed Murphy wrote: >I don't recall that offhand, and don't have time to run a full >search. I just looked it up, to borrow the wording, and the context (which I'd forgotten) turns out to be a proposal to have fora tracked by the speaker. That must have been just before you came up with truthiness.

Re: DIS: proto: distributor as an office

2007-08-24 Thread Ed Murphy
Zefram wrote: Ed Murphy wrote: This could be a monthly report; Yes. I wanted to make it a monthly report, but that would depend on the ability to report switches monthly. You protoed something to that effect, but it's not in the ruleset yet. I don't recall that offhand, and don't have tim

Re: DIS: proto: distributor as an office

2007-08-24 Thread Zefram
Ed Murphy wrote: >This could be a monthly report; Yes. I wanted to make it a monthly report, but that would depend on the ability to report switches monthly. You protoed something to that effect, but it's not in the ruleset yet. -zefram

Re: DIS: proto: distributor as an office

2007-08-24 Thread Ed Murphy
Zefram wrote: The distributor is an office. The distributor SHALL send eir weekly report to each non-null forum at least once each quarter. This could be a monthly report; it's not like the fora change very often. I don't know whether the Distributor's workload is large enough to

DIS: proto: distributor as an office

2007-08-24 Thread Zefram
proto-proposal: distributor as an office AI: 3 {{{ [This proposal depends on proposal 5172.] Amend rule 478 by replacing each instance of "Registrar" with "distributor", and by inserting before the paragraph that begins "Publicity is a forum switch" the paragraph The distributor is an off