Would you object less if we defined the phrase "natural player" to mean
"player who is a natural person", and used it?
No. I would object less if the rules were organized such that when we
eventually get tired of partnerships and repeal them, we won't have to
amend all the high-powered rules ju
Ian Kelly wrote:
>My previous comment stands: why do we need to pollute the rules with
>a multitude of "player who is a natural person" requirements when we
>can just legislate (or adjudicate) that only natural persons may be
>players?
It's interesting to have players who are not natural persons.
On 5/31/07, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The voting limit on democratic proposals (VLDP) is one for a
player who is a natural person, and zero for any other entity.
The voting limit on ordinary proposals (VLOP) is variable. The
default VLOP is 5 for a player who is
proto-proposal: better VLOP balance after wins
AI: 3
{{{
Amend rule 1950 by replacing the text:
The voting limit of an eligible voter on a democratic proposal
is one and cannot be changed except by this rule.
The voting limit of an eligible voter on an ordinary proposal is
4 matches
Mail list logo
