On Sat, 27 Oct 2018, D. Margaux wrote:
> UNDEAD seems super interesting. I just looked at a bunch of emails from
> the archive, but how did that end up? Was the contract ever revealed?
The origin of the UNDEAD is actually interesting to bring up in relation
to your latest political party idea.
On Sat, 2018-10-27 at 19:35 -0400, D. Margaux wrote:
> UNDEAD seems super interesting. I just looked at a bunch of emails
> from the archive, but how did that end up? Was the contract ever
> revealed?
It fizzled due to being excessively cautious. Given how it was
determined to not reveal any detai
UNDEAD seems super interesting. I just looked at a bunch of emails from the
archive, but how did that end up? Was the contract ever revealed?
> On Oct 27, 2018, at 6:54 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Sat, 27 Oct 2018, ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk wrote:
>>> On Sat, 2018-10-27 at 15:30 -0700,
On Sat, 27 Oct 2018, ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk wrote:
> On Sat, 2018-10-27 at 15:30 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > On Sat, 27 Oct 2018, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > > On another subject, since ATMunn's judgement brought it up, I've been
> > > thinking since our previous contract about what would happen
On Sat, 2018-10-27 at 15:30 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Oct 2018, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > On another subject, since ATMunn's judgement brought it up, I've been
> > thinking since our previous contract about what would happen if we put
> > out a hashed contract, with one of the clauses be
(oops, replied to the wrong thread obviously... changing the subject
line here to avoid confusion in case there's more discussion)
On Sat, 27 Oct 2018, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On another subject, since ATMunn's judgement brought it up, I've been
> thinking since our previous contract about what w
6 matches
Mail list logo
