On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 09:26, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 11:02 AM, comex wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 6:18 AM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>>> It matters when the person we elect as recordkeepor uses someone
>>> else's broken program and an annoying act-on-behalf system to a
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 11:02 AM, comex wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 6:18 AM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>> It matters when the person we elect as recordkeepor uses someone
>> else's broken program and an annoying act-on-behalf system to avoid
>> doing the job at all.
>
> then surely we can elect
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 6:18 AM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> It matters when the person we elect as recordkeepor uses someone
> else's broken program and an annoying act-on-behalf system to avoid
> doing the job at all.
then surely we can elect someone else as recordkeepor?
--
-c.
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 11:50 PM, comex wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 9:25 PM, Roger Hicks wrote:
>> Perhapsmy program can be easily changed, though this really has
>> nothing to do with automation, it has to do with how I (a human
>> person) interpreted the rule.
>
> Suber's point was tha
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 9:25 PM, Roger Hicks wrote:
> Perhapsmy program can be easily changed, though this really has
> nothing to do with automation, it has to do with how I (a human
> person) interpreted the rule.
Suber's point was that the game judge should have the right to choose
an inte
On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 15:25, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 12:21 AM, Roger Hicks wrote:
>> After reading it again, I see how it could be interpreted differently
>> (and the way you suggest is probably the intent of the rule), however
>> when I read the rule and coded it into m
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 10:52, Sean Hunt wrote:
> Roger Hicks wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 23:18, Sean Hunt wrote:
>>>
>>> Geoffrey Spear wrote:
Were any entities actually audited in the first 7 days of this month?
If not, why not?
>>>
>>> I don't believe so. BobTHJ attempte
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 22:10, comex wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 11:39 PM, Roger Hicks wrote:
>>> When any other entity is audited, the auditing entity (or, if
>>> there is none, the Accountor) CAN and SHALL by announcement
>>> destroy X of eir cards, selected at random, where X is
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 11:39 PM, Roger Hicks wrote:
>> When any other entity is audited, the auditing entity (or, if
>> there is none, the Accountor) CAN and SHALL by announcement
>> destroy X of eir cards, selected at random, where X is one-half
>> rounded up of the number of card
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 19:39, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 7:10 PM, Roger Hicks wrote:
>> Read the audit rule again. Each audit of the L&FD started a new ASAP
>> time limit for me to destroy cards (I have it in my queue for the next
>> automated batch I send).
>
> You read it
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 7:10 PM, Roger Hicks wrote:
> Read the audit rule again. Each audit of the L&FD started a new ASAP
> time limit for me to destroy cards (I have it in my queue for the next
> automated batch I send).
You read it again:
When any other entity is audited, the auditing entity
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 11:16, Sean Hunt wrote:
> Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 12:36 PM, Roger Hicks wrote:
>>>
>>> On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 23:18, Sean Hunt wrote:
Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>
> Were any entities actually audited in the first 7 days of this mon
Geoffrey Spear wrote:
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 12:36 PM, Roger Hicks wrote:
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 23:18, Sean Hunt wrote:
Geoffrey Spear wrote:
Were any entities actually audited in the first 7 days of this month?
If not, why not?
I don't believe so. BobTHJ attempted and failed to audit ais
On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 12:36 PM, Roger Hicks wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 23:18, Sean Hunt wrote:
>> Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>>>
>>> Were any entities actually audited in the first 7 days of this month?
>>> If not, why not?
>>
>> I don't believe so. BobTHJ attempted and failed to audit ais523 f
Roger Hicks wrote:
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 23:18, Sean Hunt wrote:
Geoffrey Spear wrote:
Were any entities actually audited in the first 7 days of this month?
If not, why not?
I don't believe so. BobTHJ attempted and failed to audit ais523 for the
Government deck; e never attempted Change or J
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 23:18, Sean Hunt wrote:
> Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>>
>> Were any entities actually audited in the first 7 days of this month?
>> If not, why not?
>
> I don't believe so. BobTHJ attempted and failed to audit ais523 for the
> Government deck; e never attempted Change or Justice.
Geoffrey Spear wrote:
Were any entities actually audited in the first 7 days of this month?
If not, why not?
I don't believe so. BobTHJ attempted and failed to audit ais523 for the
Government deck; e never attempted Change or Justice.
-coppro
Were any entities actually audited in the first 7 days of this month?
If not, why not?
18 matches
Mail list logo
