DIS: Veto is still broken (and Cards won't fix it)

2009-07-01 Thread comex
This came up in ##nomic. My proposal "fix veto" failed quorum a few months ago. Meanwhile, R106 still takes precedence over R2019, so vetoing still doesn't actually work. The Cards proposal includes the following: Title: Majority Leader. Position: The Majority Leader CAN veto a speci

Re: DIS: Veto

2007-11-25 Thread Nick Vanderweit
We ought to at least craft up a specific fix. Wouldn't it be as simple as saying that once the adoption index is set in the initial proposal, a later increase in the adoption index cannot make it democratic? avpx On Nov 25, 2007 3:20 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > avpx wrote: > > >

Re: DIS: Veto

2007-11-25 Thread Ed Murphy
avpx wrote: According to rule 106: "A Proposal with an Adoption Index of less than 2 is Ordinary. All other Proposals are Democratic." This seems fine and all, except that the powers of the Wielder of Veto describe (2019): "The Wielder of Veto CAN veto an ordinary proposal in its voting period

DIS: Veto

2007-11-25 Thread Nick Vanderweit
According to rule 106: "A Proposal with an Adoption Index of less than 2 is Ordinary. All other Proposals are Democratic." This seems fine and all, except that the powers of the Wielder of Veto describe (2019): "The Wielder of Veto CAN veto an ordinary proposal in its voting period by announcemen