Re: DIS: Test (not a report)

2018-07-16 Thread Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
I messed around with some settings and now it is working properly. On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 11:56 AM Timon Walshe-Grey wrote: > > I figured it might be interesting to see whether Unicode box-drawing > characters actually have wide support these days. How does it look to the > rest of you? > > -tw

Re: DIS: Test (not a report)

2018-07-16 Thread David Nicol
needs an explicit declaration of monospace typestyle: [image: needs monospace.PNG] ​Here it is in monospace, gmail's "fixed width" option: > ┌─┬┬┬┬┬┬┬┬┬┬┐ > │Entity │Ston│Appl│Corn│ Ore│Lmbr│Cotn│Coin│Papr│Fabr│Incs│ > ├───

Re: DIS: Test (not a report)

2018-07-16 Thread Kerim Aydin
Looks sharp/nice/correct to me. With the usual exception of that Japanese line (but it's less out-of-line then other reports have been). On Mon, 16 Jul 2018, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote: > I figured it might be interesting to see whether Unicode box-drawing > characters > actually have wide supp

Re: DIS: Test (not a report)

2018-07-16 Thread Timon Walshe-Grey
Hmm. Perhaps an experiment to shelve for the time being. 🤔 -twg ​​ ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On July 16, 2018 3:57 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: > ​​ > > =E2=94=8C=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2= > > =94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2

Re: DIS: Test (not a report)

2018-07-16 Thread Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
=E2=94=8C=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2= =94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94= =80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=AC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80= =E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=AC=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=94=80=E2=9

DIS: Test (not a report)

2018-07-16 Thread Timon Walshe-Grey
I figured it might be interesting to see whether Unicode box-drawing characters actually have wide support these days. How does it look to the rest of you? -twg ┌─┬┬┬┬┬┬┬┬┬┬┐ │Entity │Ston│Appl│Corn│ Ore│Lmbr│Cotn│Coin│Pap