Re: DIS: SCAM ALERT (was Re: BUS: Contract Hash)

2018-11-11 Thread Edward Murphy
twg wrote: Normally when someone seems suspiciously anxious to have something happen at a certain time, I expect it to be intended to help em qualify for a transparent ribbon. But I don't see any way for this proposal to inadvertently grant Gaelan one ribbon, never mind five. It might work

Re: DIS: SCAM ALERT (was Re: BUS: Contract Hash)

2018-11-06 Thread Timon Walshe-Grey
Normally when someone seems suspiciously anxious to have something happen at a certain time, I expect it to be intended to help em qualify for a transparent ribbon. But I don't see any way for this proposal to inadvertently grant Gaelan one ribbon, never mind five. It might work if e could som

Re: DIS: SCAM ALERT (was Re: BUS: Contract Hash)

2018-11-05 Thread D. Margaux
I confess I am hopelessly confused. The contract doesn’t seem to affect anyone besides twg and Gaelan. Is it a flaw in the proposal? But then what does that have to do with the timing of adoption? > On Nov 5, 2018, at 3:49 PM, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote: > > Actually, why am I even bothering with

DIS: SCAM ALERT (was Re: BUS: Contract Hash)

2018-11-05 Thread Timon Walshe-Grey
Actually, why am I even bothering with trying to outmanoeuvre Gaelan on my own. 3 coins is nothing in the scheme of things. The text of the document in question is as follows: {If proposal 8114 is resolved before Nov 7th (UTC), Gaelan SHALL pay twg 3 coins.} Proposal 8114, which I MUST resolve