Boo...
On 5/15/07, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
comex wrote:
> On Tuesday 15 May 2007 6:32 pm, Ed Murphy wrote:
>> To point out the potential problem more explicitly:
>>
>> If CFJ 1668 is judged true, then Primo-the-player ceased to exist when
>> comex became a Shareholder. I strongly
comex wrote:
On Tuesday 15 May 2007 6:32 pm, Ed Murphy wrote:
To point out the potential problem more explicitly:
If CFJ 1668 is judged true, then Primo-the-player ceased to exist when
comex became a Shareholder. I strongly urge that we install a natural
person as Clerk of the Courts until th
On Tuesday 15 May 2007 6:32 pm, Ed Murphy wrote:
> To point out the potential problem more explicitly:
>
> If CFJ 1668 is judged true, then Primo-the-player ceased to exist when
> comex became a Shareholder. I strongly urge that we install a natural
> person as Clerk of the Courts until the statem
To point out the potential problem more explicitly:
If CFJ 1668 is judged true, then Primo-the-player ceased to exist when
comex became a Shareholder. I strongly urge that we install a natural
person as Clerk of the Courts until the statement of CFJ 1668 is
confirmed false, either by judgement o
4 matches
Mail list logo
