On Wed, 2008-11-05 at 20:43 -0500, Warrigal wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 7:58 PM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On
> > behalf of Registrar ais523: ais523 publishes this Cantus Cygneus: {NO!
> > What is this? Who am I? A useless partnership, formed only as a
> > bribe. Why did you submit
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 11:48 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I retract all my votes on Proposals 5842-5941, and I vote FOR each of them.
Do you really think an equity judgment in the Artistry contract would
be worse than rewarding that spamathon? comex has blatantly ignored
eir obligati
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 20:05, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> BobTHJ wrote:
>
>> And the purpose of the scam is? I don't get it.
>
> "Vote for these and I'll be obligated to give you a share of the
> points", I think.
>
It doesn't work. Contests can only award points to their members...so
on
BobTHJ wrote:
> And the purpose of the scam is? I don't get it.
"Vote for these and I'll be obligated to give you a share of the
points", I think.
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 17:59, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 6 Nov 2008, at 00:58, comex wrote:
>
>> With ehird and my own agreement, I make these changes.
>
>
> I did agree, via private mail.
>
> I also agreed to all the other contracts there.
>
And the purpose of the scam is? I don'
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 9:06 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Warrigal wrote:
>
>> ais523, I am surprised to see you publishing a Cantus Cygneus. Why did
>> you leave so spontaneously?
>
> E is not, by any reasonable interpretation, submitting it to the
> Registrar.
You're right, I guess.
Warrigal wrote:
> ais523, I am surprised to see you publishing a Cantus Cygneus. Why did
> you leave so spontaneously?
E is not, by any reasonable interpretation, submitting it to the
Registrar.
> (Are Cantuses Cygneus, or whatever the plural is, still broken?)
No, Rule 1789's power has been in
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 8:43 PM, Warrigal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 7:58 PM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On
>> behalf of Registrar ais523: ais523 publishes this Cantus Cygneus:
> ais523, I am surprised to see you publishing a Cantus Cygneus. Why did
> you leave so s
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 7:58 PM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On
> behalf of Registrar ais523: ais523 publishes this Cantus Cygneus: {NO!
> What is this? Who am I? A useless partnership, formed only as a
> bribe. Why did you submit me, evil comex? Will I even pass? If I fail,
> how will I sur
On 6 Nov 2008, at 00:58, comex wrote:
With ehird and my own agreement, I make these changes.
I did agree, via private mail.
I also agreed to all the other contracts there.
--
ehird
10 matches
Mail list logo
