2009/1/4, Ed Murphy :
>
> w1n5t0n wrote:
>
> > Notary's Contract Report
>
> What's the ETA on bringing the wiki up to date?
>
A few hours. It should be done by 2am UTC at the latest.
--
w1n5t0n aka
Charles Schaefer
w1n5t0n wrote:
> Notary's Contract Report
What's the ETA on bringing the wiki up to date?
ihope wrote:
> On 10/04/2008, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Can this part be table-ified? Maybe with the members listed in the
>> same section.
>
> What do you mean? Make a table with the contracts as rows and people
> as columns and put an X wherever the person is a party to the
> c
On 10/04/2008, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can this part be table-ified? Maybe with the members listed in the
> same section.
What do you mean? Make a table with the contracts as rows and people
as columns and put an X wherever the person is a party to the
contract?
--Ivan Hope CXXV
Ivan Hope wrote:
> Agoran Twister (public, contest)
> The Agoran Agricultural Association (public, contest)
> Fantasy Rules (public, contest)
> Enigma (public, contest)
> Brainfuck Golf (public, contest)
> The AFO (private, partnership)
> Pineapple Partnership (public, partnership)
> The Left Hand
On 10/04/2008, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 4:27 PM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This report is self-ratifying
>
> It's not.
You're right. I thought all reports were self-ratifying. Oh well.
--Ivan Hope CXXVII
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 4:27 PM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This report is self-ratifying
It's not. The only things that are self-ratifying are:
* A public message's claim as to who published it [R2170]
* The list of instances of a class asset in the recordkeepor's report [R2166]
* A pu
7 matches
Mail list logo
