Re: DIS: Re: OFF: Distribution of proposals 6018-6026

2008-12-15 Thread Warrigal
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 6:35 PM, comex wrote: > RFC: If Murphy submitted a long proposal titled "Cleanup of Power=1.5 > definitions" that would cause a rule to contain the text {Murphy CAN > cause this rule to amend itself by announcement}, that proposal would > pass. Dissenting opinion: I at lea

DIS: Re: OFF: Distribution of proposals 6018-6026

2008-12-15 Thread comex
RFC: If Murphy submitted a long proposal titled "Cleanup of Power=1.5 definitions" that would cause a rule to contain the text {Murphy CAN cause this rule to amend itself by announcement}, that proposal would pass.

DIS: Re: OFF: Distribution of proposals 6018-6026

2008-12-13 Thread Elliott Hird
On 14 Dec 2008, at 00:00, The PerlNomic Partnership wrote: 6019 O 1 1.0 Murphy Undo the scam already I recommend voting against this one to save me/comex the trouble. grumble, appeals process...