Re: DIS: Re: OFF: Distribution of proposal 5948

2008-11-10 Thread Ed Murphy
Pavitra wrote: > On Monday 10 November 2008 04:33:05 am Ed Murphy wrote: >> Pavitra wrote: >>> I have a proposal in PerlNomic right now to limit it to once per >>> week (as Promotor reports used to be), but the only vote on it so >>> far (except mine) is AGAINST. >> How about twice per week, evenl

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: Distribution of proposal 5948

2008-11-10 Thread Pavitra
On Monday 10 November 2008 04:33:05 am Ed Murphy wrote: > Pavitra wrote: > > I have a proposal in PerlNomic right now to limit it to once per > > week (as Promotor reports used to be), but the only vote on it so > > far (except mine) is AGAINST. > > How about twice per week, evenly spaced, as durin

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: Distribution of proposal 5948

2008-11-10 Thread Taral
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 11:09 AM, Alex Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ah, I'd seen the proposal. Pavitra's PerlNomic proposal is 7 days > between; I'm not sure if this was deliberate or accidental. (PerlNomic > currently has no concept of weeks as such, only time intervals.) Oh, my. No wonder

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: Distribution of proposal 5948

2008-11-10 Thread Alex Smith
On Mon, 2008-11-10 at 11:05 -0800, Taral wrote: > On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 8:47 AM, Alex Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sun, 2008-11-09 at 18:29 -0600, Pavitra wrote: > >> I have a proposal in PerlNomic right now to limit it to once per week > >> (as Promotor reports used to be), but the on

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: Distribution of proposal 5948

2008-11-10 Thread Taral
On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 8:47 AM, Alex Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 2008-11-09 at 18:29 -0600, Pavitra wrote: >> I have a proposal in PerlNomic right now to limit it to once per week >> (as Promotor reports used to be), but the only vote on it so far >> (except mine) is AGAINST. > The

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: Distribution of proposal 5948

2008-11-10 Thread Alex Smith
On Sun, 2008-11-09 at 18:29 -0600, Pavitra wrote: > I have a proposal in PerlNomic right now to limit it to once per week > (as Promotor reports used to be), but the only vote on it so far > (except mine) is AGAINST. The problem with limiting it to at least 7 days between proposals is that almost

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: Distribution of proposal 5948

2008-11-10 Thread Ed Murphy
Pavitra wrote: > I have a proposal in PerlNomic right now to limit it to once per week > (as Promotor reports used to be), but the only vote on it so far > (except mine) is AGAINST. How about twice per week, evenly spaced, as during Zefram's tenure?

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: Distribution of proposal 5948

2008-11-09 Thread Pavitra
On Sunday 09 November 2008 10:48:26 am Joshua Boehme wrote: > On Sun, 9 Nov 2008 11:23:40 -0500 > > comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 9:38 AM, The PerlNomic Partnership > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > This distribution of proposal 5948 > > > > By the way, am I the

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: Distribution of proposal 5948

2008-11-09 Thread Joshua Boehme
On Sun, 9 Nov 2008 11:23:40 -0500 comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 9:38 AM, The PerlNomic Partnership > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > This distribution of proposal 5948 > > By the way, am I the only one getting sick of these super-frequent > distributions? No. Could we

DIS: Re: OFF: Distribution of proposal 5948

2008-11-09 Thread comex
On Sat, Nov 8, 2008 at 9:38 AM, The PerlNomic Partnership <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This distribution of proposal 5948 By the way, am I the only one getting sick of these super-frequent distributions?