On Jan 11, 2008 9:55 AM, Charles Reiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 11, 2008 5:49 AM, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I hereby assign the judicial panel of Murphy, root, and woggle as judge
> > of CFJ 1860a.
>
> Proto-judgement here:
>
> With the consent of Murphy and root, I intend to
BobTHJ wrote:
On Jan 14, 2008 3:14 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I consent. Judges should not get away with accepting bribes.
Even if the judgment was appropriate?
In the case at hand, you did a poor job of addressing and refuting
arguments in favor of the statement's relevance.
On Jan 14, 2008 3:14 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I consent. Judges should not get away with accepting bribes.
>
Even if the judgment was appropriate?
BobTHJ
root wrote:
On Jan 14, 2008 2:33 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jan 11, 2008 3:49 AM, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I hereby assign the judicial panel of Murphy, root, and woggle as judge
of CFJ 1860a.
Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=1860a
This case
root wrote:
On Jan 11, 2008 3:49 AM, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I hereby assign the judicial panel of Murphy, root, and woggle as judge
of CFJ 1860a.
Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=1860a
This case requires further consideration. Due to the disregard for
the
On Jan 14, 2008 2:33 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 11, 2008 3:49 AM, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I hereby assign the judicial panel of Murphy, root, and woggle as judge
> > of CFJ 1860a.
> >
> > Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=1860a
>
> This c
On Jan 11, 2008 3:49 AM, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I hereby assign the judicial panel of Murphy, root, and woggle as judge
> of CFJ 1860a.
>
> Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=1860a
This case requires further consideration. Due to the disregard for
the judicial
On Jan 11, 2008 4:50 PM, Josiah Worcester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Friday 11 January 2008 10:55:49 Ian Kelly wrote:
> > On Jan 11, 2008 7:55 AM, Charles Reiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Jan 11, 2008 5:49 AM, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > I hereby assign the judicial pa
On Friday 11 January 2008 10:55:49 Ian Kelly wrote:
> On Jan 11, 2008 7:55 AM, Charles Reiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Jan 11, 2008 5:49 AM, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > I hereby assign the judicial panel of Murphy, root, and woggle as judge
> > > of CFJ 1860a.
> >
> > Proto-judg
On Jan 11, 2008 7:55 AM, Charles Reiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Jan 11, 2008 5:49 AM, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I hereby assign the judicial panel of Murphy, root, and woggle as judge
> > of CFJ 1860a.
>
> Proto-judgement here:
>
> With the consent of Murphy and root, I intend to
On Jan 11, 2008 5:49 AM, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I hereby assign the judicial panel of Murphy, root, and woggle as judge
> of CFJ 1860a.
Proto-judgement here:
With the consent of Murphy and root, I intend to have the panel rule REASSIGN.
Arguments:
The original judge's ruling is clea
11 matches
Mail list logo
