Charles Reiss wrote:
>I'm tempted to just rule IRRELEVANT because, as far as I can tell,
>'partner' is not a term used or defined by the rules.
We've historically been quite liberal in what we're willing to judge on.
You're never obliged to judge IRRELEVANT, and in this case you have
relevant thin
On Jan 14, 2008 10:51 AM, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I hereby recuse comex from CFJ 1855. I hereby assign woggle as judge
> of CFJ 1855.
>
> Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=1855
>
> == CFJ 1855 ==
>
> Type
2 matches
Mail list logo
