On 5/24/08, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 9:43 PM, Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Accountor's Report
> > Date of last report: never
>
> Should I bother with a claim of error, since the Accountor has
> previously issued a report?
Oh, I'd forgotten abou
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 9:43 PM, Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Accountor's Report
> Date of last report: never
Should I bother with a claim of error, since the Accountor has
previously issued a report?
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 9:47 PM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 9:43 PM, Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Accountor's Report
>> Date of last report: never
>> Date of this report: now
>>
>> Trumpets:
>>
>> The letter I: 1
>
> That's the type of report I'd be happy with
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 9:43 PM, Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Accountor's Report
> Date of last report: never
> Date of this report: now
>
> Trumpets:
>
> The letter I: 1
That's the type of report I'd be happy with doing on a regular basis.
I suggest that we stop making ourselves recordkeep
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 5:50 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 3:45 PM, Iammars <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Oh man, I want this job. :)
>
> Sure, until somebody comes up with a scam that involves creating
> hundreds of contract-based assets with no recordkeepors
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 3:45 PM, Iammars <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oh man, I want this job. :)
Sure, until somebody comes up with a scam that involves creating
hundreds of contract-based assets with no recordkeepors that the
Accountor would then be required to track...
-root
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 5:42 PM, Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm not sure I have a report -- depends on how you read the rules.
>
> There are no assets without a defined recordkeepor.
>
> --
> Eris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> "Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you."
>
7 matches
Mail list logo
