Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Rulekeepor] Second Revised S:R

2017-10-27 Thread VJ Rada
Not pink-slippable: no personal gain. But it would certainly be illegal. And not really acceptable except for in extraordinary circumstances. On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 9:05 PM, VJ Rada wrote: > That would be illegal and probably pink-slippable. And, it would be > not even a report in the first plac

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Rulekeepor] Second Revised S:R

2017-10-27 Thread VJ Rada
That would be illegal and probably pink-slippable. And, it would be not even a report in the first place. On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 8:45 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: > You cna change it by just lying and letting it ratify. > > > On 10/27/2017 01:58 AM, Owen Jacobson wrote: >> On Oct 2

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Rulekeepor] Second Revised S:R

2017-10-27 Thread Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
You cna change it by just lying and letting it ratify. On 10/27/2017 01:58 AM, Owen Jacobson wrote: > On Oct 23, 2017, at 6:43 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > wrote: > >> -- >> >> Rule 2497/3 (Power=1) >> Floating Value >

DIS: Re: OFF: [Rulekeepor] Second Revised S:R

2017-10-26 Thread Owen Jacobson
On Oct 23, 2017, at 6:43 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: > -- > > Rule 2497/3 (Power=1) > Floating Value > > Floating Value is a natural singleton switch, tracked by the > Treasuror. > > > The followin