This really should be merged into Notary, and the Notary regulations
should be removed. The other regulations still make sense, even if
they only come up upon occasion. Perhaps an exception to No News Is
Some News along with a simplification for maintenance is warranted.
I'll have a look at it over
I've seriously considered proposing the repeal of the regulations
system, now that we've given them a chance. However, there are several
tasks, such as tournaments, for which they seem the appropriate
device. I'd favor simplifying them down and merging them into your
responsibilities as Notary, giv
#repealallregulations.com
On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 6:55 PM, Ned Strange wrote:
> I repeal Regulation 1.1
>
> On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 4:35 PM, Aris Merchant
> wrote:
>> The ACORN (Agora Nomic Code of Regulations)
>>
>> ==
>> TITLE
Oh, my, this is getting interesting. We'll just have to see how the judge
rules.
-Aris
On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 11:41 PM Ned Strange
wrote:
> So I do just want to respond to that.
> [quote]The Promulgator of a regulation is an officer, not a person[/quote]
> The term "officer" is defined by rule
So I do just want to respond to that.
[quote]The Promulgator of a regulation is an officer, not a person[/quote]
The term "officer" is defined by rule 1006 as "the holder of an
office". The holder of an office is a person who holds it at a
particular time. Rule 1006 also states that "If the holder
Arguments (partly quoted from above):
The Promulgator of a regulation is an officer, not a person. In this
case, the Promulgator is the Notary, not o. o only promulgated the
regulation in eir persona as Notary, which has now passed to you. I
therefore believe that V.J. Rada has the power to repeal
I disagree. The Promulgator of a regulation is an officer, not a person. In
this case, the Promulgator is the Notary, not o. o only promulgated the
regulation in eir persona as Notary, which has now passed to you. I
therefore believe that you have the power to repeal the regulation.
-Aris
On Tue,
Do other people believe my interpretation is correct?
On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 5:07 PM, Ned Strange wrote:
> The Regulations rule states that "Regulations may be repealed by their
> promulgator". o. was the promulgator of the regulation you refer to, so I
> believe I cannot repeal or amend that Re
The Regulations rule states that "Regulations may be repealed by their
promulgator". o. was the promulgator of the regulation you refer to, so I
believe I cannot repeal or amend that Regulation.
On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 5:59 PM, Aris Merchant <
thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun,
On Sun, Mar 25, 2018 at 11:53 PM, Aris Merchant
wrote:
> --
> Regulation 1.2
> Contract Sustenance Exemptions
> Parent rule(s): 2526 ("Sustenance Payments", Power 2.4)
>
>
> The following contracts are exempt from paying sustenanc
It remains a regulation until the Notary repeals it, which e hasn't done.
-Aris
On Sun, Mar 4, 2018 at 5:46 PM Ned Strange wrote:
> "
> The following contracts are exempt from paying sustenance payments,
> until the date specified:
>
> * Order of the Occult Hand, until January 31st, 2018."
>
>
"
The following contracts are exempt from paying sustenance payments,
until the date specified:
* Order of the Occult Hand, until January 31st, 2018."
Firstly: sad that contract didn't work. Secondly, is this still a regulation?
(Thirdly repeal all regulations)
On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 11:29 AM,
I don't think e ever resolved the intent.
-Aris
On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 6:29 PM, VJ Rada wrote:
> Didn't o promulgate a regulation setting the weekly contract limit at 3?
>
> On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 11:46 AM, Aris Merchant
> wrote:
>> The ACORN (Agora Nomic Code of Regulations)
>>
>> ==
Didn't o promulgate a regulation setting the weekly contract limit at 3?
On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 11:46 AM, Aris Merchant
wrote:
> The ACORN (Agora Nomic Code of Regulations)
>
> ==
> TITLE 0
> Contains no regulations, and is rese
ah ok, ty
On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 9:13 AM, Aris Merchant <
thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> It's a report of all regulations. Regulations are intended as a way to
> grant power under the rules to officers. They were enacted partly at
> the request of a few players, who wished to use t
It's a report of all regulations. Regulations are intended as a way to
grant power under the rules to officers. They were enacted partly at
the request of a few players, who wished to use them for game systems
they were working on. Those systems didn't go anywhere, so right now
regulations don't do
I've been wondering for a while about this.
What's the intent for this?
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 7:13 AM, Aris Merchant <
thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The ACORN (Agora Nomic Code of Regulations)
>
>
> TITLE 0
> C
Whats the regkeepor for? Its not too clear for me :S
El El sáb, 16 sept 2017 a las 9:00, Aris Merchant <
thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> escribió:
> The ACORN (Agora Nomic Code of Regulations)
>
> ==
> TITLE 0
> Contains no r
It's 12:30 local, so I'm going to sleep. I just overreacted a bit and
called elections. We'll see how it works out. If that CoE was right your
deputization failed anyway. We'll see how it all works out.
-Aris
On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 12:38 AM V.J Rada wrote:
> It is overdue enough, it was last pu
It is overdue enough, it was last published 14 August by my reckoning.
Sorry yeah I did notice the CoE, it was my bad taking it. I can resign
the office? And you can take it then.
On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 5:35 PM, Aris Merchant
wrote:
> First of all, I don't think it's overdue enough. Second, the r
First of all, I don't think it's overdue enough. Second, the reason I
haven't published lately is because there's an outstanding CoE, tied to a
judicial case that was never judged, and the report is basicly empty
anyway. Try to ask before you take offices, would you? If you actually hold
this now,
21 matches
Mail list logo
