Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJs 3315-17 assigned to scshunt

2013-05-12 Thread Charles Walker
On 12 May 2013, at 00:49, Sean Hunt wrote: NttPF

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJs 3315-17 assigned to scshunt

2013-05-11 Thread Tanner Swett
Commentary on CFJs 3315–3317: If I remember correctly, it was previously judged that the sender of a message is the person who authorized it to be sent, regardless of whether or not e actually saw the message and consented specifically to its exact content; and that, furthermore, something like "I

DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJs 3315-17 assigned to scshunt

2013-05-11 Thread Sean Hunt
On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Ed Murphy wrote: > Detail: > http://zenith.homelinux.net/**cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=3315 > > == CFJ 3315 == > > An agreement exists between a first-c