Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJs 2216-17 assigned to woggle

2008-10-19 Thread Ed Murphy
woggle wrote: > I judge both of these FALSE. It is difficult to determine who the mind NttPF. The judgements make sense, though; if another partnership stated "only partner X is responsible for Y", then it could effectively make agreements about Y without partners other than X having to be infor

DIS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJs 2216-17 assigned to woggle

2008-10-19 Thread Charles Reiss
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 22:44, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I change all sitting players to standing. > > Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2216 > > == CFJ 2216 == > >If only Murphy had been given the pa